GNU bug report logs - #45909
rust@1.47.0, rust-1.48.0 and rust-1.49.0 broken

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Subject: bug#45909: closed (Re: bug#45909: rust <at> 1.47.0, rust-1.48.0 and
 rust-1.49.0 broken)
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 20:27:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#45909: rust <at> 1.47.0, rust-1.48.0 and rust-1.49.0 broken

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 45909 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
45909: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=45909
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>, 45909-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45909: rust <at> 1.47.0, rust-1.48.0 and rust-1.49.0 broken
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 21:26:44 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Leo Famulari 写道：
> If anyone is wondering why we didn't notice failures of packages 
> that
> depend on rust, the canonical 'rust' packages is rust-1.45, but 
> these
> failures seem to only affect later versions of rust.

Thanks.  I am reverting the update on master for now.

Kind regards,

T G-R

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Subject: rust <at> 1.47.0, rust-1.48.0 and rust-1.49.0 broken
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 23:50:13 +0000

The recent llvm 11.0.0 -> 11.0.1 change seems to have broken rust on the
master branch.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.