GNU bug report logs - #45898
27.1; wedged in redisplay again

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Devon Sean McCullough <Emacs-hacker2018 <at> jovi.net>

Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 18:14:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 27.1

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: psainty <at> orcon.net.nz, larsi <at> gnus.org, Emacs-hacker2018 <at> jovi.net, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, 45898 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#45898: 27.1; wedged in redisplay again
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 13:33:10 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

> On 2022-07-01,, at 13:12 , Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> 
>> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com>
> 
>> Big downside is not being able to produce some form of sharable text or pdf output.
> 
> I'm sure there is some way of producing text from an image, nowadays.
> But even if just the image is posted, it provides useful information.

There is, on macOS, but it doesn't produce something useful from call stacks, for instance.

> 
>> What would be a good place for such a script in the repo?  Does admin/macos sound right?  But I'll wait for your okay for that.
> 
> I think nextstep/ is a better place.  admin/ is for stuff useful only
> to Emacs developers, whereas this script sounds like being more
> generally useful.

Ok.  Can someone familiar with nextstep/ tell me where to put the script?  And, if it should be changed in some way?

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 357 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.