GNU bug report logs -
#45836
cups-service-type duplicates lp group
Previous Next
Full log
Message #20 received at 45836 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at> skribis:
> * gnu/services/cups.scm (%cups-accounts): Try to use the lp group defined in
> %base-groups.
> * gnu/system/shadow.scm (account-activation): Delete duplicate (eq?) users
> and groups before transforming them to specs and asserting, that names are
> unique.
[...]
> (define %cups-accounts
> - (list (user-group (name "lp") (system? #t))
> + (list (or
> + ;; The "lp" group should already exist; try to reuse it.
> + (find (lambda (group)
> + (and (user-group? group)
> + (string=? (user-group-name group) "lp")))
> + %base-groups)
> + (user-group (name "lp") (system? #t)))
> (user-group (name "lpadmin") (system? #t))
> (user-account
> (name "lp")
This bit LGTM, and I think it can be committed in a commit of its own.
> diff --git a/gnu/system/shadow.scm b/gnu/system/shadow.scm
> index 0538fb1a24..7c57222716 100644
> --- a/gnu/system/shadow.scm
> +++ b/gnu/system/shadow.scm
> @@ -321,13 +321,13 @@ of user '~a' is undeclared")
> <user-group> objects. Raise an error if a user account refers to a undefined
> group."
> (define accounts
> - (filter user-account? accounts+groups))
> + (delete-duplicates (filter user-account? accounts+groups) eq?))
>
> (define user-specs
> (map user-account->gexp accounts))
>
> (define groups
> - (filter user-group? accounts+groups))
> + (delete-duplicates (filter user-group? accounts+groups) eq?))
Why use ‘eq?’? I’d use ‘equal?’, but note that <user-account> records
cannot necessarily be compared with ‘equal?’ because of the thunked
‘home-directory’ field (‘equal?’ is meaningless for procedures).
Thanks,
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 176 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.