GNU bug report logs -
#45831
28.0.50; list-colors-display callback arg needs to evaluate to a function?
Previous Next
Reported by: Mauro Aranda <maurooaranda <at> gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 23:28:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: fixed, patch
Found in version 28.0.50
Fixed in version 28.1
Done: Mauro Aranda <maurooaranda <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #16 received at 45831 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
"Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie> writes:
> Mauro Aranda <maurooaranda <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> (defun list-colors-print (list &optional callback)
>> (let ((callback-fn
>> - (if callback
>> - `(lambda (button)
>> - (funcall ,callback (button-get button 'color-name))))))
>> + ;; Expect CALLBACK to be a function, but allow it to be a form that
>> + ;; evaluates to a function, for backward-compatibility. (Bug#45831)
>> + (cond ((functionp callback)
>> + (lambda (button)
>> + (funcall callback (button-get button 'color-name))))
>> + (callback
>> + `(lambda (button)
>> + (funcall ,callback (button-get button 'color-name)))))))
>
> Why not a single evaluated closure, e.g. like the following?
>
> (let ((callback-fn
> (when callback
> ;; Expect CALLBACK to be a function, but allow it to be a form that
> ;; evaluates to a function, for backward-compatibility (bug#45831).
> (or (functionp callback)
> (setq callback (eval callback lexical-binding)))
> (lambda (button)
> (funcall callback (button-get button 'color-name))))))
> ...)
Just because I didn't want to change the original code too much, in case
someone thought the backward-compatible change wasn't necessary. But of
course, your sample code looks better.
> Thanks,
Thanks for taking a look.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 358 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.