Package: emacs;
Reported by: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:26:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: fixed
Found in version 28.0.50
Fixed in version 28.1
Done: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Message #11 received at 45798 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie> To: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> Cc: 45798 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#45798: 28.0.50; nsm-check-local-subnet-ipv4 fails with nsm-trust-local-network Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 23:03:21 +0000
Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> writes: > "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie> writes: > >> I stepped through nsm-should-check a bit, but I don't understand what is >> or should be happening. The test fails when local var off-net is set to >> nil, which happens when nsm-network-same-subnet returns non-nil. This >> happens with the following local var values: >> >> ip: [0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0] >> >> info: (lo [0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0] >> [0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0] >> [65535 65535 65535 65535 65535 65535 65535 65535 0]) >> >> addresses: ([0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0]) > > There is no way that 'network-lookup-address-info' on google.com > should return ::1. Oops, sorry! I must have been looking at the wrong value. There are two cases where nsm-network-same-subnet returns non-nil, and in both cases: addresses: ([10752 5200 16395 3073 0 0 0 139 0] [10752 5200 16395 3073 0 0 0 113 0] [10752 5200 16395 3073 0 0 0 138 0] [10752 5200 16395 3073 0 0 0 100 0] [74 125 193 139 0] [74 125 193 101 0] [74 125 193 102 0] [74 125 193 138 0] [74 125 193 100 0] [74 125 193 113 0]) network-interface-list: ((wlp3s0 [65152 0 0 0 38609 2370 19874 38730 0] [65152 0 0 0 65535 65535 65535 65535 0] [65535 65535 65535 65535 0 0 0 0 0]) (wlp3s0 [10754 32900 8418 50048 62480 33512 14881 61151 0] [10754 32900 8418 50048 65535 65535 65535 65535 0] [65535 65535 65535 65535 0 0 0 0 0]) (lo [0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0] [0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0] [65535 65535 65535 65535 65535 65535 65535 65535 0]) (wlp3s0 [192 168 0 144 0] [192 168 0 255 0] [255 255 255 0 0]) (lo [127 0 0 1 0] [127 255 255 255 0] [255 0 0 0 0])) info: (lo [0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0] [0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0] [65535 65535 65535 65535 65535 65535 65535 65535 0]) The only difference is in 'ip': 1. [10752 5200 16395 3073 0 0 0 139 0] 2. [10752 5200 16395 3073 0 0 0 113 0] > You donʼt have a spare entry lying around in > /etc/hosts for google.com by any chance? C-x i /etc/hosts RET: 127.0.0.1 localhost 127.0.1.1 tia # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts ::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback ff02::1 ip6-allnodes ff02::2 ip6-allrouters > What do you get for > > (network-lookup-address-info "google.com") ([10752 5200 16395 3073 0 0 0 139 0] [10752 5200 16395 3073 0 0 0 138 0] [10752 5200 16395 3073 0 0 0 102 0] [10752 5200 16395 3073 0 0 0 100 0] [74 125 193 100 0] [74 125 193 102 0] [74 125 193 138 0] [74 125 193 101 0] [74 125 193 113 0] [74 125 193 139 0]) > (network-lookup-address-info "google.com" 'ipv4) ([74 125 193 100 0] [74 125 193 138 0] [74 125 193 139 0] [74 125 193 113 0] [74 125 193 101 0] [74 125 193 102 0]) > (network-lookup-address-info "google.com" 'ipv6) ([10752 5200 16395 3073 0 0 0 102 0] [10752 5200 16395 3073 0 0 0 113 0] [10752 5200 16395 3073 0 0 0 139 0] [10752 5200 16395 3073 0 0 0 101 0]) > How about: > > (require 'dns) > (dns-query "google.com" 'A) "74.125.193.139" > (dns-query "google.com" 'AAAA) "2a00:1450:400b:c01:0:0:0:65" >> network-interface-list: >> ((wlp3s0 [65152 0 0 0 38609 2370 19874 38730 0] >> [65152 0 0 0 65535 65535 65535 65535 0] >> [65535 65535 65535 65535 0 0 0 0 0]) >> (wlp3s0 [10754 32900 8418 50048 62480 33512 14881 61151 0] >> [10754 32900 8418 50048 65535 65535 65535 65535 0] >> [65535 65535 65535 65535 0 0 0 0 0]) >> (lo [0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0] [0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0] >> [65535 65535 65535 65535 65535 65535 65535 65535 0]) >> (wlp3s0 [192 168 0 144 0] [192 168 0 255 0] [255 255 255 0 0]) >> (lo [127 0 0 1 0] [127 255 255 255 0] [255 0 0 0 0])) >> >> I've observed that the test fails only on my home network. I've heard >> that my ISP and the modem they provide use a weird dual IPv6 stack that >> has caused people problems in the past, but I know next to nothing about >> these things and can't say if it's related to the issue at hand. > > Most IPv6 stacks are dual stack IPv4/IPv6. Do they mean they're doing > IPv4 in IPv6 in some way? Sorry, I don't know. Is there a way to find out that doesn't involve contacting them (which I never look forward to :)? > Which ISP is this? Virgin Media in Ireland. >> Another observation is that the test succeeds if I replace "google.com" >> with "gnu.org". Should I just change the test to use "gnu.org", and >> forget about this? Or is there some interesting issue here? Any >> suggestions or guidance are very welcome. >> >> Here's my /etc/resolv.conf, in case it matters: >> >> # Generated by NetworkManager >> nameserver 8.8.8.8 >> nameserver 8.8.4.4 >> nameserver 2001:4860:4860::8888 >> # NOTE: the libc resolver may not support more than 3 nameservers. >> # The nameservers listed below may not be recognized. >> nameserver 2001:4860:4860::8844 > > And what do you get for > > dig -t A google.com ; <<>> DiG 9.16.8-Debian <<>> -t A google.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 32726 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;google.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: google.com. 61 IN A 74.125.193.113 google.com. 61 IN A 74.125.193.100 google.com. 61 IN A 74.125.193.139 google.com. 61 IN A 74.125.193.102 google.com. 61 IN A 74.125.193.101 google.com. 61 IN A 74.125.193.138 ;; Query time: 24 msec ;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8) ;; WHEN: Mon Jan 11 21:10:49 GMT 2021 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 135 > dig -t AAAA google.com ; <<>> DiG 9.16.8-Debian <<>> -t AAAA google.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6510 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;google.com. IN AAAA ;; ANSWER SECTION: google.com. 41 IN AAAA 2a00:1450:400b:c01::8b google.com. 41 IN AAAA 2a00:1450:400b:c01::71 google.com. 41 IN AAAA 2a00:1450:400b:c01::64 google.com. 41 IN AAAA 2a00:1450:400b:c01::8a ;; Query time: 32 msec ;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8) ;; WHEN: Mon Jan 11 21:11:03 GMT 2021 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 151 > This might be interesting as well: > > ping -6 google.com ping -6 google.com PING google.com(2a00:1450:400b:c01::66 (2a00:1450:400b:c01::66)) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 2a00:1450:400b:c01::66 (2a00:1450:400b:c01::66): icmp_seq=1 ttl=107 time=12.7 ms 64 bytes from 2a00:1450:400b:c01::66 (2a00:1450:400b:c01::66): icmp_seq=2 ttl=107 time=18.6 ms [...] FWIW, this also happened on my older laptop, not just this new one I'm writing from. Both run the same suite of Debian, Systemd, NetworkManager, etc. Let me know what else I can do, and thanks for your help, -- Basil
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.