GNU bug report logs - #45692
[PATCH 0/4] Even Better ZFS Support on Guix

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
Cc: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> ist.tugraz.at>, raid5atemyhomework <raid5atemyhomework <at> protonmail.com>, "45692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <45692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: [bug#45692] [PATCH 0/3] Better Support for ZFS on Guix
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 19:38:54 +0100

Hi Maxime,

On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 at 18:23, Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be> wrote:

> I have been more-or-less ignoring the ZFS patches since some time after
> <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/45692#44>.  If ZFS people(^), after a
> disagreement about licensing concerns, directly jump to accusations of
> gaslighting and sabogate, completely ignoring my previous arguments (*)
> without trying to refute any of them or bringing new arguments, then I
> don't want to be involved with ZFS.

I sympathize with you Maxime.


> Also, the various ‘work-arounds’ around the GPL<->CDLL incompatibility
> still seem super fishy to me even if they _might_ be technically
> correct.  To me, this makes reviewing the code practically pointless --
> why review the zfs service patches if they will have to be reverted
> due to incompatibility concerns anyway?  Summarised:

You wrote:

        To be clear, I don't oppose the inclusion of the ZFS service on
        basis of the licensing anymore.

        <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/45692#57>

an your accurate summary gives me the impression you changed your
mind.  Just to be sure, did you ?


Cheers,
simon

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.