Subject: Re: bug#45626: flyspell Accessibility Problem

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 16:20:35 +0100

Christopher Dimech <[email-masked]> writes:

> After a round of Software Accessibility iterations with Protesilaos Stavrou
> regarding the wavy underline provided by flyspell, it was determined that
> the wavy line is too thin for colour contrast ratios to make any difference.
>
> One idea we came up with was to have the wavy line thicker.  However, the usual
> way ispell-word highlights the word is the way forward.  Flyspell should use the
> same approach highlight words as ispell-word does, eliminating the
> wavy underline.

I'm not quite sure I understand the request here -- this is about the
`flyspell-incorrect' and `flyspell-duplicate' faces?  Can't people just
customise that to whatever they want?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no