From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 31 21:43:37 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2021 02:43:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41968 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kvAPg-00084u-P4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 21:43:36 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44100) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kvAPf-00084n-HJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 21:43:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvAPf-0006Bq-AS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 21:43:35 -0500 Received: from cyan.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.47]:48968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvAPc-0001LY-TX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 21:43:34 -0500 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718841E206A for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 02:43:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a95.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-5-6.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.5.6]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0ED1D1E1F8A for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 02:43:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a95.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.11); Fri, 01 Jan 2021 02:43:29 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Chief-Relation: 487bd6dc1141d3a7_1609469009272_1631386799 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1609469009272:3880706053 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1609469009271 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a95.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a95.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5627EF57 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:43:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= jidanni.org; bh=V2Zqr0QXYgKr3aSgbdupahCF2Jk=; b=FKe9DRl/wlokWxIN o5xUbuXXINTBM3W0Fbvu/5e14rLPWoS0EfrxQehhxgvjaVvzo5F61cn/4pV5gQlS yuwA8Bmk1WEIlfgDRFbWJz8gChIGNuS6VgUg0NoA0yo8KiqVRf/tt9EBHXhs3ogW qYho7k7BqeGxDEaNZ56xaTkhYws= Received: from jidanni.org (114-41-23-158.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [114.41.23.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a95.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 949137EE63 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:43:28 -0800 (PST) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a95 From: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 27.1; Sometime gnus could be less forgiving of bad RFC 2047 encoded word syntax X-Debbugs-Package: emacs,gnus Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2021 10:43:25 +0800 Message-ID: <87o8i91inm.8.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=23.83.212.47; envelope-from=jidanni@jidanni.org; helo=cyan.elm.relay.mailchannels.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) If only sometimes gnus was stricter, or even warned, when encountering bad Subject lines, we users could have warned the power company years earlier, rather than only learning about the problem one day when we used Gmail instead. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65500376/mime-email-subject-etc-headers-vs-utf8-first-split-then-encode So being over-forgiving has its pluses and minuses. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 01 06:06:11 2021 Received: (at 45586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2021 11:06:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55471 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kvIG3-0006ST-51 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2021 06:06:11 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:56842) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kvIFz-0006Rq-4e for 45586@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2021 06:06:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+fhYTUzYJefrqK2jrt3biAKZH/WwGxXRmGemWYaPWEg=; b=LDLE13ewPSypCvf7VoTvvnfKmj iH49qpwha6ahrdlM8KXmx06DitYehSXhojU56wp+3iU+ncVQHXeWZNmLKCHRHIoyrtyCng4QgqlVK seA8jNqjTLNgCQDPWzRmRHtNmK4jI1q6Ofk86AHG978FS90YgrAY5DvwoPlwqTVUj0q4=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kvIFq-0000GJ-Q3; Fri, 01 Jan 2021 12:06:01 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson Subject: Re: bug#45586: 27.1; Sometime gnus could be less forgiving of bad RFC 2047 encoded word syntax References: <87o8i91inm.8.fsf@jidanni.org> X-Now-Playing: Dif Juz's _Who Says So?_: "The Dub Song" Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2021 12:05:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87o8i91inm.8.fsf@jidanni.org> (=?utf-8?B?IuepjeS4ueWwvA==?= Dan Jacobson"'s message of "Fri, 01 Jan 2021 10:43:25 +0800") Message-ID: <87mtxsc3xm.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson writes: > If only sometimes gnus was stricter, or even warned, when encountering > bad Subject lines, we users could have warned the power company years > earlier, rather than only learning about the problem [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 45586 Cc: 45586@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) =E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC Dan Jacobson writes: > If only sometimes gnus was stricter, or even warned, when encountering > bad Subject lines, we users could have warned the power company years > earlier, rather than only learning about the problem one day when we > used Gmail instead. > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65500376/mime-email-subject-etc-heade= rs-vs-utf8-first-split-then-encode > > So being over-forgiving has its pluses and minuses. Gnus will continue to be liberal in what it receives. Closing. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 01 06:06:14 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2021 11:06:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55474 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kvIG6-0006Sk-Cw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2021 06:06:14 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:56856) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kvIG5-0006SC-Dp for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2021 06:06:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=33uLOIrYuIsNTC9jgmrFuFHZMJqIYIFeON0mtzVZ15A=; b=su1gM+wsVbxc254BC8T/99mKa1 ZB5D33Cp06YBSuvF7v4ATwmzuQxSBUztAxn/j6FoEVpjXDI92R+LBCHGK6SWcQPcZyplUotvrUZDH OWBBz+Hd4n+5HIZMH0OUQqp+bS3bXZ3Lqtpy5mhqw3y7w4nL3jbEDPtdaXc7nDcm0RBk=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kvIFx-0000GW-SJ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2021 12:06:07 +0100 Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2021 12:06:04 +0100 Message-Id: <87lfdcc3xf.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #45586 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 45586 notabug close 45586 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 45586 notabug close 45586 quit From unknown Thu Sep 11 22:04:24 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 12:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator