GNU bug report logs -
#45557
27.1; Incorrect rendering of COMBINING OVERLINE
Previous Next
Reported by: Stephen Eglen <sje30 <at> cam.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 17:38:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: notabug
Found in version 27.1
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #35 received at 45557 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> And the same info about "x" also shows the same font, i.e.
>
> ftcrhb:-UKWN-JuliaMono-normal-normal-normal-*-19-*-*-*-m-0-iso10646-1
>
> Anyway, the above means Emacs didn't compose these COMBINING OVERLINE
> woth "x", for some reason. The question is why.
yes; this is the output for "x":
position: 85 of 87 (97%), column: 2
character: x (displayed as x) (codepoint 120, #o170, #x78)
charset: ascii (ASCII (ISO646 IRV))
code point in charset: 0x78
script: latin
syntax: w which means: word
category: .:Base, L:Left-to-right (strong), a:ASCII, l:Latin, r:Roman
to input: type "C-x 8 RET 78" or "C-x 8 RET LATIN SMALL LETTER X"
buffer code: #x78
file code: #x78 (encoded by coding system utf-8-unix)
display: by this font (glyph code)
ftcrhb:-UKWN-JuliaMono-normal-normal-normal-*-19-*-*-*-m-0-iso10646-1 (#xA7)
Character code properties: customize what to show
name: LATIN SMALL LETTER X
general-category: Ll (Letter, Lowercase)
decomposition: (120) ('x')
There are text properties here:
fontified t
[back]
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 191 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.