GNU bug report logs - #45357
[PATCH] * lisp/man.el (Man-getpage-in-background): always use shell-file-name

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#45357: closed ([PATCH] * lisp/man.el (Man-getpage-in-background):
 always use shell-file-name)
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 08:19:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Dec 2020 09:17:54 +0100
with message-id <87o8il3php.fsf <at> gmx.de>
and subject line Re: bug#45357: [PATCH] * lisp/man.el (Man-getpage-in-background): always use shell-file-name
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #45357,
regarding [PATCH] * lisp/man.el (Man-getpage-in-background): always use shell-file-name
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
45357: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=45357
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Nika Otiashvili <nikaoto <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/man.el (Man-getpage-in-background): always use
 shell-file-name
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 23:24:13 +0400

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,
First time sending a patch to bug-gnu-emacs, not sure if this is the
correct format.
Please indicate any errors I made in my formatting of the email or the
attached patch file.

Regards,
Nika Otiashvili

[0001-lisp-man.el-Man-getpage-in-background-always-use-she.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
To: Nika Otiashvili <nikaoto <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 45357-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, eliz <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45357: [PATCH] * lisp/man.el (Man-getpage-in-background):
 always use shell-file-name
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 09:17:54 +0100

Nika Otiashvili <nikaoto <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hello,

Hi,

> So, I've concluded that the first two reasons described in my patch
> are irrelevant and the last one is indeed very weak. I believe my
> patch would not benefit anyone and it only solves a specific problem I
> had with my
> configuration.

Closing the bug.

> Regards,
> Nika Otiashvili

Best regards, Michael.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.