Subject: Re: bug#45108: Added emacs-burly

From: Nicolas Goaziou <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 08:23:21 +0100

Hello,

Oleg Pykhalov <[email-masked]> writes:

> Pushed with changes above to master.

I don't think the emacs-map package is needed as a propagated inputs
since it ships with Emacs. Have you tried building emacs-burly without
it?

For the same reason I'm not even sure we need to provide emacs-map at
all (we do not provide emacs-seq either).

WDYT?

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou