From unknown Sat Jun 21 17:34:07 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#45039 <45039@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#45039 <45039@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Duplicate folders in docs Reply-To: bug#45039 <45039@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 00:34:07 +0000 retitle 45039 Duplicate folders in docs reassign 45039 guix-patches submitter 45039 Holger Peters severity 45039 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 04 04:44:47 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2020 09:44:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42657 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kl7dv-0001l2-6r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 04:44:47 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:59622) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kl7dt-0001ks-Mr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 04:44:46 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44880) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kl7dt-0002Gq-11 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 04:44:45 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:42037) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kl7dq-0005Kg-EA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 04:44:44 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B1892400FF for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:44:37 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1607075077; bh=wOHs98opmWz1A/RzVJGD3momNvGz/VXNbWnZzK6tGRA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=osKN94FjtYZCJB0emoZS+ahg+v5eWk/yfabujUbdoMAoUHwRX06kJpxojhM4cHAjD zrXbh7hit6L9smvOhW5vzC3X8vHnlgLqo6JNzqiirFAY6K4zqIpKT0xI/2VC4Ht3oN FiuhdyAuPeMSPN5O9/3bdGPoWM0xqQpJUqQBUh3JXrzQIhay2SI17nBykepB44YX6x 0V2tkI4N0mPrP2EOgHJqUekTrIQ1iihXN+jrC5genwEX+FVeYhZgLhudN+bDuvMJ75 4TPCJ1vSr3u7LoOtJc3HfBRKQT6mgpfyrG1O7wWGJd2jNVkc0U9mRGtOWLBmyNucki JyIeTC20Sbo4w== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4CnSTw5lz4z9rxQ for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:44:36 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 10:44:36 +0100 From: Holger Peters To: Guix patches Subject: Duplicate folders in docs Message-ID: X-Sender: holger.peters@posteo.de User-Agent: Posteo Webmail Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=holger.peters@posteo.de; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) On https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Getting-Started.html there is a duplication of use of etc/profile -- Holger Peters From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 04 04:51:46 2020 Received: (at 45039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2020 09:51:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42714 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kl7kg-0001zw-3y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 04:51:46 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:38860) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kl7ke-0001zh-8L for 45039@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 04:51:45 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D422E160061 for <45039@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:51:37 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1607075497; bh=wD2uYTbqrEzmWRwsOMzZjsBNXFpgXDhf4wPX+uze4ns=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=PO+uiJcDXRve/dslZe1r0kXL0X0TvF/+w9LCe1GqER3+QRah752W4awYRQwpmMRRc sDJg5GIGvD+MAdHHR6eMflti4/4eNAlGZwyERRJF0/1D+oZjvxgH17qWT1XPf6oTWo 50kZWT9MN181R+MvKRCUaihlv/pwZn3Hjw8oMwq5LvwpRkqEwOVQqDZBWJ+Yr4M08w aDanICe/Dv5tQcq30Cp+2OSYKi+D5jt/pWTAc0w1MTMAHZ1reZbXeJWvn/n6syiUxy IET1NfUCYLeDPH7/Z0uz/xwfxKZX9gReE4iHRF4+Ts7shv4rwHS7rsy5J49oHByc4D gAqCV6MBI9Qyw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4CnSf139Lwz9rxN for <45039@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:51:37 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 10:51:37 +0100 From: Holger Peters To: 45039@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] Remove duplicate path declaration Message-ID: X-Sender: holger.peters@posteo.de User-Agent: Posteo Webmail X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 45039 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) * doc/guix.texi: Fixup path declaration. --- doc/guix.texi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi index 889f380108..b86b81cfbf 100644 --- a/doc/guix.texi +++ b/doc/guix.texi @@ -2774,7 +2774,7 @@ the command prints and, similar to what we saw above, paste these two lines in your terminal and @file{.bash_profile}: @example -GUIX_PROFILE="$HOME/.config/guix/current/etc/profile" +GUIX_PROFILE="$HOME/.config/guix/current" . "$GUIX_PROFILE/etc/profile" @end example -- 2.29.2 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 04 13:59:55 2020 Received: (at 45039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2020 18:59:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45802 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klGJ9-00083K-8v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 13:59:55 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f173.google.com ([209.85.222.173]:42194) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klGJ6-000836-RZ for 45039@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 13:59:53 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f173.google.com with SMTP id z188so6421242qke.9 for <45039@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 10:59:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+xVXIbElqVoZWPLZxYThJZcQfSrmQ+n85AC1PZtBNAk=; b=OX6UVU8pUl8FoAcREiQpTjkP3DWp+2wqOCT75liZdzAoqXBsa27pwe+dxoZm4PbOmf EG+mhClnryIesB97UeY2vWF++lJlB79yaxPJkasTn3++yK62IwjJ+bHwoP00wO92iAvn LAUE6zMDtOHUYrYOjSxRl/9HD/y5mtjJ9ewCnaA2OjkPxQm4DQTPvjVr05d/g/XEBgu2 l4/tByCHRMDVIPVLLPZj/njQAM4m5XaTDjgzkII+goce/Cl+2XYAWjwKP0X4IsjOIW6U WfjfznkFK++e1KIuFGfp4RDX9HPisV/lOev2Lg52uA27O+KGEARCSZvFT8mmCXcWlx2+ ZEOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+xVXIbElqVoZWPLZxYThJZcQfSrmQ+n85AC1PZtBNAk=; b=lGZGIehjtoMV/Iw3X1HCcwB+u9XEETSf+WhIOk4cgVeemIrGZp11BRKEMdR7RSBx7r 7NqD9SJF59z9caY3ZzCK2QZEcvg8Ng4h6Xh+aIemYgRpr7swwghL6cjVc7mPf809j45J xZk5ecoIhOVUKCkgvKNd0dQlrBdH8lgC04t8UnckpXqrMBy5Yi3xSUDtyIlppPGsMq1C TrSu/Xss/rLqSKuHJlcNJvhHAIieJ5hi0kQt+IaKYYsDzO1gFdvrpIj1GAxjpWC1+usX eDXFbOJIGC8diiKFEvdatkZk/dgnwXYr1u4o9NfR+Davsob8UYE9df8rLzqt/A7+wPp+ U+2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530GRMUjAV6NnmRBYQu3BTN6gQS4+DXJ5JDSTjtWoU9pT4rsj8wq 3K0ZrKvgRO3gXhyUcI9b/m4JEGad7cqHKeksJMA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwz6kBQlLDSwMjdIHOI7VC1dvaZ+fNYQOcOx73bOpQ67uzKTxsftO10IhH800vVLI4+eK3qvtkRIJkeERcGkA= X-Received: by 2002:a37:9ed3:: with SMTP id h202mr10608573qke.126.1607108387259; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 10:59:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: zimoun Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 19:59:35 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bug#45039] Duplicate folders in docs To: Holger Peters Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 45039 Cc: 45039@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, Thanks for the report. On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 10:45, Holger Peters wrote: > On https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Getting-Started.html there > is a duplication of use of etc/profile I am not sure to see where. Could you send a patch? All the best, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 04 14:01:45 2020 Received: (at 45039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2020 19:01:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45817 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klGKv-00088C-Jn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:01:45 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f171.google.com ([209.85.222.171]:41231) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klGKs-00087s-OZ for 45039@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:01:43 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f171.google.com with SMTP id d9so6419499qke.8 for <45039@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 11:01:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gXABU92nPYEqq1VOCNwyzpMA1Eb42DxuEBuYbnR9ETI=; b=aTOKbJWiip1MRT3FhAxWF+H8v+G4nioHmHZ5Xz4Qg16HrEyxKytBXXTT990oLiW2Xw ANLWm0Kq+q+IQz1Po3vKUJwkKVPi+nnWOAlpW2nEHDF28rGLl2TMCKLyvUdt52avsJBi ulLd75zl07ehaLzr3i63Xr0lG7JYgLeu+9Tdo0nNiUpAo19d78ygULEk8kHsJdsjz56m RIoatvSS6E+UVh4zm47rpmNR4zAwa0vGg61b+yKkRvjAPfsgdjpxok3cmV8xqgTZn2yR KlJyOvBwiGQvkFhSGPjEcBZgEsT87wMIXT0LIUa68vCZ3FWtSu+dzmsWuXbNYOMMPvU6 p0wg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gXABU92nPYEqq1VOCNwyzpMA1Eb42DxuEBuYbnR9ETI=; b=bp4j/zyd4Hr29DtnPMU0iQSDfyna/OlDjptwxnv2EO14XUyOjnE92Poi4BpzdWZlfD FZ4C0gXi4nMKUIjam3Nt5ablqwNFAkHx86ZeNVLZXxodcEHVsOT3m4kKTMNexbM9yhUK 4AcwiiL4sEFgOH+CtaoGzemCb3rEjr9kJEoXhi04kjc7uDe1y9q76VFBKTBLq3pGKSHo iixeWW05cwxHPYEb0RHZ0S8+fmAVArTLmzQ5i6r7lRQVo5fDekmRXZHpa6YbSC6LbOOE TIRasqKMUE1uJn+RrsdxZijnX29QFDbr5GyokR+rh1S8lMioXt7KrgZoxXNkUjK6O6CO M7Ug== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jG68gZJ/tcVQ1W1nMrz4t+LNIpsYzcnd+Fx8DgGKVc9b08HrT bWEAZ/LptJUoecvaHgYaDYSdCL/9PLjX3vzlprg5xFKi50I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwRwnDawFsHP9/I+fR3XirS2z6f3JIXTgOoNoMxDzATfwhBMxeZ7nVtDVEfjh1lK56CvdV8fm/NwyKCNcTJ3w0= X-Received: by 2002:a37:9ed3:: with SMTP id h202mr10619494qke.126.1607108497374; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 11:01:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: zimoun Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 20:01:26 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bug#45039] Duplicate folders in docs To: Holger Peters Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 45039 Cc: 45039@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi again, On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 19:59, zimoun wrote: > Could you send a patch? Sorry you did in the thread. :-) Thank you. All the best, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 04 14:13:53 2020 Received: (at 45039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2020 19:13:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45824 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klGWe-0008P5-Ph for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:13:52 -0500 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:60281) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klGWd-0008Ot-A6 for 45039@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:13:52 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5687D8; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:13:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:13:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=KBra5zJkGk12nMJaeQjtww93FTL0Oh+UHPIvWK7Xyk8=; b=1UNLx0aJ2erc SZTCeWSIIhd5Z9H2tWF3YNCU/MIsgbaPBaH3Ym5P0Rxyw8T+mlXLHyMlpjFCdyBr x+G9dfnVDXpkEZGQPqUIuqKRNCuvfwgrh7kUAa47iqn5yLCCsbuDa4Y6nVuigNfh SbF0h9B6iDZ5/xVt0F/ImtOYhDLp0aA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=KBra5zJkGk12nMJaeQjtww93FTL0Oh+UHPIvWK7Xy k8=; b=CJbr5EJ9TRUAR02ez1MrB77roCZAjP5iXeYAyYEuCdfpaO4idp++wYAMd 89J80FkkQrF8BVME3i3dmTMT7la4uQnANvOUy6ZpHKE5a3GCiJQ4RWq3hB8AQVba Xp/JeC8kZ6sbiwWc+q447F+CTiy3kMOfgQN46x0MyyxwN1uKOb+rSli9EVAMXEL7 6zlbqvBkmgLa9DK2P6fNKcWZBMzq9n0jif7fhTNvG8AdkKs0cm1o4U2ec0lebaOb rHlQUmVqS02SYVw1KvBqgRN7WLibS0IwOjLN7ClXzpFvSdRtzXqSAQgis3hvTOS7 YXr/dD4CUME/KRPekWX5qOxY2SXzw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudeikedguddvvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtkeertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefnvgho ucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeegjeeggeehtddugfffuddtvdfffeffjeekffffveffheegvddvuedtffek jeejjeenucfkphepjeefrddugedurdduvdejrddugeeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghm vg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-73-141-127-146.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.141.127.146]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 37A441080059; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:13:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:13:37 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Holger Peters Subject: Re: [bug#45039] [PATCH] Remove duplicate path declaration Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 45039 Cc: 45039@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:51:37AM +0100, Holger Peters wrote: > * doc/guix.texi: Fixup path declaration. > @example > -GUIX_PROFILE="$HOME/.config/guix/current/etc/profile" > +GUIX_PROFILE="$HOME/.config/guix/current" > . "$GUIX_PROFILE/etc/profile" > @end example Thanks! That example is definitely not right... However, it doesn't seem right to me either that GUIX_PROFILE should point to '~/.config/guix/current/etc/profile'. That profile won't contain anything useful related to packages the user installs. Compare it to the contents of '~/.guix-profile/etc/profile' to see what I mean. I alo was curious about the preceding paragraph, which states "Unless you’re on Guix System, the first time you run guix pull, be sure to follow the hint that the command prints [...]". I re-installed Guix on a Debian system and it prints this instead: ------ hint: Consider setting the necessary environment variables by running: GUIX_PROFILE="/root/.guix-profile" . "$GUIX_PROFILE/etc/profile" Alternately, see `guix package --search-paths -p "/root/.guix-profile"'. ------ CC-ing Ludovic (who wrote this section) for clarification. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 04 15:54:01 2020 Received: (at 45039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2020 20:54:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45970 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klI5Z-0004VI-7k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:54:01 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com ([209.85.128.67]:34398) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klI5W-0004V3-Mn for 45039@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:53:59 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id g25so5441121wmh.1 for <45039@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 12:53:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NRg86HQmalz5tl7frutKQ2h3H+g/FjY3ERvPbDo1sN8=; b=E870zYS08TncMDKHzlivefkWh+nhNEl5SWfrzenOUWKCVezxznAKjSVMN7Vpr1Hd1r o7XjyEcnHjUQ36eGBpcUy8taYVWPs2u7E2ZmIgP9jWuNxBk7UBhMilEGKq+L99nO+WFn Y10oPx+a6mN5/B4stYb1FI60+meNQTna9WtDUvyNyh0cLEEMIKcs/vx0aANzXqfo87aq Wen2yEMEDCccHy32lO927h3uUijbcv2ad/uxfPuQErQYJxsmu/B6ene4g3o+Sb65utNz E+9hAXF8Qy6L1Oh1YwU6t9ekLg6dEI4zg8Aa9cSaybJx0G2XldkR1MspwAQlZPpgcJp3 CN0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NRg86HQmalz5tl7frutKQ2h3H+g/FjY3ERvPbDo1sN8=; b=eacJyDi0PiuxCkktw4gYD8HW+tCDT7IMEFDAj11sc6jqoIXjHdW7tZ9Mlp8K1q3cMs 57N8DRRPsgT8sbYENr3gPZCOixlo5NgJB9riNTRNjqUgQn08yb8xX4f8EWVMl1LkV2PT Vi9wFA48JMTJZshRQzu1L1jKgtWdssP/tQGxN/ttoGJJ5t62pEjAycdVmafHlEknr6pd 1M29A1/BM+HODbsdV36okvjpv4C1+uYv9I01PJzjqYJl2KSu/nwVvjxO1RLO/kf+FZA/ rses9XWQXaKSQk7TKea9Olt2DRGVL+zihvHg4VryDGai4MEqRYGox1eYGJ3gOrHYvKQO JHDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Mx5hnMPlXWq+wOeQQPLrTfjKxEcm3tkKaYscu2g2kWVpv1gYe M9v/cOFgIlWHRN34bLlGxGw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxkTlgmUaEmUEsanFWKkMshtDAchNXAfd8jEoj4z454fWNE+0Hi2HYMIkXFYWtOeRowK81DWQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:454:: with SMTP id 81mr6152205wme.178.1607115232738; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 12:53:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l16sm4920397wrx.5.2020.12.04.12.53.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 12:53:52 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: Leo Famulari , Holger Peters Subject: Re: [bug#45039] [PATCH] Remove duplicate path declaration In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 21:46:01 +0100 Message-ID: <86tut1b8qe.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 45039 Cc: 45039@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Leo, On Fri, 04 Dec 2020 at 14:13, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:51:37AM +0100, Holger Peters wrote: >> * doc/guix.texi: Fixup path declaration. > >> @example >> -GUIX_PROFILE=3D"$HOME/.config/guix/current/etc/profile" >> +GUIX_PROFILE=3D"$HOME/.config/guix/current" >> . "$GUIX_PROFILE/etc/profile" >> @end example > > Thanks! That example is definitely not right... > > However, it doesn't seem right to me either that GUIX_PROFILE should > point to '~/.config/guix/current/etc/profile'. That profile won't > contain anything useful related to packages the user installs. Compare > it to the contents of '~/.guix-profile/etc/profile' to see what I mean. Well, from my understanding, doing this: GUIX_PROFILE=3D$HOME/.config/guix/current . $GUIX_PROFILE/etc/profile allows to have the guix commands that refer to the latest version =E2=80=9C= guix pull=E2=80=9D=E2=80=99ed. Moreover, you also have the last version of the= manual with: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- export INFOPATH=3D"$HOME/.config/guix/current/share/info${INFOPATH:+:}$INFO= PATH" --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- To me, the manual is right for this part. Maybe I am missing something. > I alo was curious about the preceding paragraph, which states "Unless > you=E2=80=99re on Guix System, the first time you run guix pull, be sure = to > follow the hint that the command prints [...]". I re-installed Guix on a > Debian system and it prints this instead: > > ------ > hint: Consider setting the necessary environment variables by running: > > GUIX_PROFILE=3D"/root/.guix-profile" > . "$GUIX_PROFILE/etc/profile" > > Alternately, see `guix package --search-paths -p "/root/.guix-profile"'. > ------ Did you run =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D as regular user? All the best, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 04 16:15:31 2020 Received: (at 45039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2020 21:15:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45983 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klIQN-00051r-MH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 16:15:31 -0500 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:47985) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klIQI-00051X-Ro for 45039@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 16:15:30 -0500 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA673AEF; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:15:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 16:15:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=gUJv8XNE/4DYwACY9oqBJxMwMy7CuJUZMITINxkqa1M=; b=mEwoYTJrfVhD +cnCXArF/eLNu5A+2jcm7gp4YrgQZDi+vnu0ZsOH7QT4MugDQpwHeYQ7lgPBN5cQ lEncR3lEbdkpd8TOsQWfp7g0C1iHtAfJsvxXOLphdWK/3OPByorAr4u1t6DLZlpD ZbrV72qJPoDIoDRq59/hCa6/tWHn6UM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=gUJv8XNE/4DYwACY9oqBJxMwMy7CuJUZMITINxkqa 1M=; b=Qk7g2JF40bkoVOP3hlfQ7XDOv1Z+mNxs1PFslreimZf9PwcSkYDebSJiH 5+SDpFUBFO476cLq9MtJpy3lhWly993lQ+U4hKpLZmWKx/VH5d5+Za4OTD4DTWOm 61u6OE9qeihrDipXBLXRIFzzf1fgI/7uTN7BJLuql5UWie4A5QrMlfChRJI6bgqI mE6qCcG92YWgsKh85u3k+iV4i1MJ93XgqaHhQv7YvmaV2t95lyii527KvdMa0FtG VRi5ANFQgJ/PW3httf3QxQ0nXAeOr31XOPsp2qdkzx57TXbfMyfrMcOldxX9Nr5m YvYZbv/Wwxz5EPn66TLvFhYnuo5aw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudeikedgudegiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtkeertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefnvgho ucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeegjeeggeehtddugfffuddtvdfffeffjeekffffveffheegvddvuedtffek jeejjeenucfkphepjeefrddugedurdduvdejrddugeeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghm vg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-73-141-127-146.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.141.127.146]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C79CD24005D; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:15:19 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:15:12 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: zimoun Subject: Re: [bug#45039] [PATCH] Remove duplicate path declaration Message-ID: References: <86tut1b8qe.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <86tut1b8qe.fsf@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 45039 Cc: 45039@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= , Holger Peters X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:46:01PM +0100, zimoun wrote: > Well, from my understanding, doing this: > > GUIX_PROFILE=$HOME/.config/guix/current > . $GUIX_PROFILE/etc/profile > > allows to have the guix commands that refer to the latest version “guix > pull”’ed. Moreover, you also have the last version of the manual with: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > export INFOPATH="$HOME/.config/guix/current/share/info${INFOPATH:+:}$INFOPATH" > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > To me, the manual is right for this part. Maybe I am missing something. I suppose that one could source both 'etc/profile' directories, from ~/.guix-profile and ~/.config/guix/current. > Did you run “guix pull” as regular user? No, as the root user. It's the only user on that server. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 04 16:37:03 2020 Received: (at 45039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2020 21:37:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45996 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klIlC-0005Z6-RB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 16:37:03 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com ([209.85.221.66]:35915) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klIl8-0005YX-JG for 45039@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 16:37:01 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id z7so6681785wrn.3 for <45039@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 13:36:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EutiSterHirNMElD/zo5u3EhcOSAqRu0wOQMJ/f8b/M=; b=dR6L+YrihM/vGLcMH4U90nlWV+uFvPi5xScJdNhzY6RRk2qIvT2YNeaa5Z5cw4Knod cWi9LmFzi3/DIInTE5QVKU0XjSJNGksB4RXIRu+NkDKnF6EjifyYIjX9uTzGclaUXbFs X4dozoCD3OcQ+VHiK5QvivNscrJOfsDF6Bmgq6UmsF9oZfI2pk4sTFi+xsfKGM0JXgBC fqJvojnqdCQBKtJuJ+hetSFT45+xtqP1DMPURDN5AdN0queNbA8bQgbY2lgNTP62gKGa Uj889XdJR2nRWUgNMJ95fnKgP00qVDdkQXhEc64BBXYfPOQnzpy0dI8PgZBbifvwPzTB d/Cg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EutiSterHirNMElD/zo5u3EhcOSAqRu0wOQMJ/f8b/M=; b=NEq21eHt8fy6rpyoP5htMLkqQ5eSGH9UZywBv8MBvePmvnBFt6ZrXAX13QGdOJf9KQ e/CVgLWYlvcxXu/+24tbdr1beVF6avbTOqnktIG3Fm9mS/K+y8qpYu2w3atSC7tnqJdy +Jb00gD5UlKD4+8axqmRmJusSQAGkDvxcnaIdH8SgZHt739MvyM0ys4X4AGcIeJ/FExD ecxc+J2KJzis+bpyQLzvb1Wic5tfuNfT+Z+2OHXfAk8t3UF7DSj6JyLIb8vhAxYy7pxB ZHVUD5f1PWQ08hamBF4m3+JOgQNwi4iBHhci1oYiZ16FhXs70pU/6HROS/n23QJ1LBTg aZTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5308qMAp9iaukax6Nln5NsB6zSXQ+SjM1QqadThU4FYb6iaLi+4P aBm3S6kMM0r7Haz8ei8Md9g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIBopVYRyAmAQMZoTSaVCFV3vxJWcQAJCVqAsbV4z0fDwoJgy26vxTNmrkzUwjG/diMoYwHA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:151:: with SMTP id r17mr7140986wrx.157.1607117812730; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 13:36:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h20sm4383194wmb.29.2020.12.04.13.36.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 13:36:52 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [bug#45039] [PATCH] Remove duplicate path declaration In-Reply-To: References: <86tut1b8qe.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 22:30:11 +0100 Message-ID: <86r1o5b6os.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 45039 Cc: 45039@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Holger Peters X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Fri, 04 Dec 2020 at 16:15, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:46:01PM +0100, zimoun wrote: >> Well, from my understanding, doing this: >>=20 >> GUIX_PROFILE=3D$HOME/.config/guix/current >> . $GUIX_PROFILE/etc/profile >>=20 >> allows to have the guix commands that refer to the latest version =E2=80= =9Cguix >> pull=E2=80=9D=E2=80=99ed. Moreover, you also have the last version of = the manual with: >>=20 >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> export INFOPATH=3D"$HOME/.config/guix/current/share/info${INFOPATH:+:}$I= NFOPATH" >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >>=20 >> To me, the manual is right for this part. Maybe I am missing something. > > I suppose that one could source both 'etc/profile' directories, from > ~/.guix-profile and ~/.config/guix/current. My .bash_profile contains: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- export GUIX_MYPROFILES=3D~/.config/guix/profiles for p in $(ls --color=3Dno -1 $GUIX_MYPROFILES) do profile=3D${GUIX_MYPROFILES}/${p}/${p} if [ -d $profile ] then GUIX_PROFILE=3D$profile . $profile/etc/profile # unset $profile fi done GUIX_PROFILE=3D$HOME/.guix-profile . $GUIX_PROFILE/etc/profile # the latest Guix version lives there # needs to be first in the PATH GUIX_PROFILE=3D$HOME/.config/guix/current . $GUIX_PROFILE/etc/profile # Ugly workaround export PATH=3D"$HOME/.config/guix/current/bin${PATH:+:}$PATH" # ~/.config/current/bin/guix repl works with readline export GUILE_LOAD_PATH=3D"$HOME/.guix-profile/share/guile/site/3.0${GUILE_L= OAD_PATH:+:}$GUILE_LOAD_PATH" # lastest info manual export INFOPATH=3D"$HOME/.config/guix/current/share/info${INFOPATH:+:}$INFO= PATH" --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Hope that helps. >> Did you run =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D as regular user? > > No, as the root user. It's the only user on that server. So, the message seems consistent, isn=E2=80=99t it? I am not sure better c= ould be done for the root user. Well, I do not know. :-) All the best, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 07 04:04:21 2020 Received: (at 45039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2020 09:04:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52363 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmCRQ-00046J-LU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 04:04:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49442) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmCRP-000467-Hm for 45039@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 04:04:19 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50995) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmCRK-0001XK-8X; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 04:04:14 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=46986 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kmCRJ-0005RP-EM; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 04:04:13 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [bug#45039] [PATCH] Remove duplicate path declaration References: Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 10:04:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:13:37 -0500") Message-ID: <87v9de0yyb.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 45039 Cc: 45039@debbugs.gnu.org, Holger Peters X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Leo Famulari skribis: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:51:37AM +0100, Holger Peters wrote: >> * doc/guix.texi: Fixup path declaration. > >> @example >> -GUIX_PROFILE=3D"$HOME/.config/guix/current/etc/profile" >> +GUIX_PROFILE=3D"$HOME/.config/guix/current" >> . "$GUIX_PROFILE/etc/profile" >> @end example > > Thanks! That example is definitely not right... Indeed; applying. > However, it doesn't seem right to me either that GUIX_PROFILE should > point to '~/.config/guix/current/etc/profile'. That profile won't > contain anything useful related to packages the user installs. Compare > it to the contents of '~/.guix-profile/etc/profile' to see what I mean. Note that GUIX_PROFILE here is a shell variable, not an environment variable. It value matters only for the =E2=80=9C.=E2=80=9D that immediate= ly follows. After that, it no longer matters. > I alo was curious about the preceding paragraph, which states "Unless > you=E2=80=99re on Guix System, the first time you run guix pull, be sure = to > follow the hint that the command prints [...]". I re-installed Guix on a > Debian system and it prints this instead: > > ------ > hint: Consider setting the necessary environment variables by running: > > GUIX_PROFILE=3D"/root/.guix-profile" > . "$GUIX_PROFILE/etc/profile" > > Alternately, see `guix package --search-paths -p "/root/.guix-profile"'. > ------ > > CC-ing Ludovic (who wrote this section) for clarification. Isn=E2=80=99t it what =E2=80=98guix install=E2=80=99 printed rather than wh= at =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99 printed? For example, look: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix pull -p /tmp/g [=E2=80=A6] building profile with 1 package... hint: Consider setting the necessary environment variables by running: GUIX_PROFILE=3D"/tmp/g" . "$GUIX_PROFILE/etc/profile" Alternately, see `guix package --search-paths -p "/tmp/g"'. hint: After setting `PATH', run `hash guix' to make sure your shell refers = to `/tmp/g/bin/guix'. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The hint is about this very profile, not about ~/.guix-profile. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 07 14:31:23 2020 Received: (at 45039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2020 19:31:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55522 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmMEF-000628-JH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 14:31:23 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:55865) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmMEE-00061w-Fn for 45039@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 14:31:23 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5625B5C00BC; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:31:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 07 Dec 2020 14:31:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=taI2cr44t2rLHEUuytWRYcBG2kr3rIx16kfmdM1C/Kc=; b=RQ052L+0xEY1 /jYLV5nCV8rvaCS7aJYHatpIWUUXmHmY/iUK/xGJGAuNNIj94rjYXdXMDrOxa+3/ USxYTMIs/6Ai7XkNDh8u2xUxzCluVujHqqr2mjIHTskzkeW63SEjJr1+SOI7Mw4u WAcRYCtgdys/UBdeDdi2sYr5S4g9B9M= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=taI2cr44t2rLHEUuytWRYcBG2kr3rIx16kfmdM1C/ Kc=; b=DIkQDjPdXKK734sUCagMcAmI+Dqqw9TzF0pgMX2KHF5LVAMCS7/DlqqH5 HmcS+ljYqYn1Mc5GSq7nkZaMG9D4yXp7O1ewUNka6gW+G015cLr1VTZ88JXaG9Cb dRI158HnaUrk8awWoz0GRY5Xq7qYsueisI0UVWwtorXLnBgeOnjvdqedWKP8Uy6S d4Q+MhpHuwVkMaaCmgVJSr6z9X7nAPzYIFA2Wo8BdlGKIFHKPBYlzlaK3JMVYViX 9O+8B4y1XyA9ofilGrcnY52ImYvL+L43MNu/022f8yuBfGCGTv+FpVaJyfDLEpDK 9BBpu5Wjhxk/6/74i5dPQWfsdg/vg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudejgedguddvhecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtkeertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefnvgho ucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeegjeeggeehtddugfffuddtvdfffeffjeekffffveffheegvddvuedtffek jeejjeenucfkphepjeefrddugedurdduvdejrddugeeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghm vg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-73-141-127-146.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.141.127.146]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 849A824005A; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:31:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:31:10 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Subject: Re: [bug#45039] [PATCH] Remove duplicate path declaration Message-ID: References: <87v9de0yyb.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87v9de0yyb.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 45039 Cc: 45039@debbugs.gnu.org, Holger Peters X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:04:12AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Note that GUIX_PROFILE here is a shell variable, not an environment > variable. It value matters only for the “.” that immediately follows. > After that, it no longer matters. Oooooh, right! My mistake... From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 15 22:09:22 2021 Received: (at 45039-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2021 02:09:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50165 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4DI2-0004c4-2D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 22:09:22 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-f49.google.com ([209.85.219.49]:38598) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4DI0-0004bq-0J for 45039-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 22:09:20 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-f49.google.com with SMTP id o9so3876292qvu.5 for <45039-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 19:09:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0LVGdiKadFHPToEormUX71UAILLQVWGpmtRFcGrkm0s=; b=WrX5nfzsIzDlJv7+mHPc+SykkPiXwRgno2A0WeMnDxAfs5bn0IJC3YBYlTsHgHKmYD PV7IsuqPJrUJm5kKxKrFBcgNqnM6JfN1cAyBsaRxO3v1K+T+SszmerLPuQRu7goLAWAI k+3fbMfiHBA6pMoBl4hEP3luPs43EQGJ7JqmC6dDzPvelMCTzO097U1vaLEczYwckKUA Elc5DWjLJ03aBT4fb3PyJ44Ovk9WRTv0NUeHVXqokZo8T0MN7fv66jkPgQubm2LOOjU3 DzTd67m5Ajw1glD0ybCCMub9mw4o7FOfzps9Co3NbzyCdAeMAcsImyATYX8VREnnfTGL yM2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0LVGdiKadFHPToEormUX71UAILLQVWGpmtRFcGrkm0s=; b=GTZ6uKvLdGkHBfe+UF/6YFepMqH8lYTIqLJnZLRT7GMSyaRbjiS3+KQ1ZWqyRCOISg ALPVA8DhA9K3UfOyqJN5bBStzgFxmPidhMsiINYVPHzl582DnDndFgup67ykDy3xauaK HseZjKmEOl/OdpafuBM2R/OzSaH1Y7n+Es5/WAU+pEIsR6kMb3XREKP6dtlF32KnN6Q6 Wa3/x20yBSJNmYGQVKNntolmKiApDoErRmza/zRLXR+XSvoGFD9gSsVT9uetMb16DIc6 LxOCCrfa5iTy1zBz/1Iuk9uKEpj7Q5qG0OGnlwh2hPhK7g+7vOSFAOQ0kPcgiVXAI2+q i2rA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533zYAJYkR8+X8FJvvyiNuNjjhnFrf1WbTsqey2PZxfvUcuXamC7 IdvbEKY3LjdTxbXA6H9cursRcAMOSiFeYvlD X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwU70DzsFWGewxiK83V4mU+Jo4AVThxHNmQKErEZqjgicP6+mBd/fUkKPOHZyvfvvZlrCazgQ== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e54e:: with SMTP id n14mr7591967qvm.41.1626401354746; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 19:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-159-138.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.159.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i67sm3395582qkd.90.2021.07.15.19.09.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Jul 2021 19:09:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#45039: Duplicate folders in docs References: <87v9de0yyb.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 22:09:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87v9de0yyb.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Mon, 07 Dec 2020 10:04:12 +0100") Message-ID: <87im1bm2ly.fsf_-_@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 45039-done Cc: 45039-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Holger Peters , Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > Leo Famulari skribis: > >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:51:37AM +0100, Holger Peters wrote: >>> * doc/guix.texi: Fixup path declaration. >> >>> @example >>> -GUIX_PROFILE=3D"$HOME/.config/guix/current/etc/profile" >>> +GUIX_PROFILE=3D"$HOME/.config/guix/current" >>> . "$GUIX_PROFILE/etc/profile" >>> @end example >> >> Thanks! That example is definitely not right... > > Indeed; applying. Thanks! Closing. Maxim From unknown Sat Jun 21 17:34:07 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator