GNU bug report logs - #45013
Using a different tags program

Previous Next

Package: automake;

Reported by: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>

Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:02:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#45013: closed (Using a different tags program)
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 02:15:03 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sat, 5 Dec 2020 19:14:22 -0700
with message-id <202012060214.0B62EMtf024170 <at> freefriends.org>
and subject line Re: bug#45013: Using a different tags program
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #45013,
regarding Using a different tags program
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
45013: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=45013
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
To: bug-automake <bug-automake <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Using a different tags program
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:01:09 +0000
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
There doesn't seem to be a way for the user to configure a different ctags
program, unless I'm overlooking something? Passing "CTAGS=foo" to configure
has no effect; it seems that all one can do is pass "CTAGS=foo" to make
every time one runs "make tags".

-- 
https://rrt.sc3d.org
[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
To: rrt <at> sc3d.org
Cc: 45013 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45013: Using a different tags program
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 19:14:22 -0700
    I have looked into it and attach a trivial patch, which works nicely.

Excellent, thanks much.

    It's not obvious to me whether any documentation is required; 

Yeah. The existing Tags node was rather inconsistent about mentioning
the various variables. I took the opportunity to tweak the text
there, and committed it all together (hope you don't mind).

BTW, it seems you reversed which file got which change (and it's tags.am
not tags.m4). I just changed the text around.

Thanks again (and closing),
Karl


This bug report was last modified 4 years and 223 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.