GNU bug report logs - #44962
Small mistake in emacs manual ?

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: jon <at> krom.eu

Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:44:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 44962 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 44962 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#44962; Package emacs. (Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:44:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to jon <at> krom.eu:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:44:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jon Krom <jon <at> krom.eu>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Small mistake in emacs manual ?
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:52:06 +0100
On this web-page

https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/PostScript-Variables.html

appears the sentence:

"Alternatively, you can set ps-print-color-p to black-white to print 
colors on black/white printers."

Shouldn't this be:

"Alternatively, you can set ps-print-color-p to black-white to print 
black/white on color printers."

Regards,
Thanks for this great editor,
Jon




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#44962; Package emacs. (Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:54:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 44962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: jon <at> krom.eu
Cc: 44962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#44962: Small mistake in emacs manual ?
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:53:35 +0200
> From: Jon Krom <jon <at> krom.eu>
> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:52:06 +0100
> 
> On this web-page
> 
> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/PostScript-Variables.html
> 
> appears the sentence:
> 
> "Alternatively, you can set ps-print-color-p to black-white to print 
> colors on black/white printers."
> 
> Shouldn't this be:
> 
> "Alternatively, you can set ps-print-color-p to black-white to print 
> black/white on color printers."

No, I don't think so.  This setting is supposed to produce a better
looking printout on black/white printers, so it makes no sense to use
it when your printer supports colors.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#44962; Package emacs. (Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:06:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 44962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jon Krom <jon <at> krom.eu>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 44962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#44962: Small mistake in emacs manual ?
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:04:28 +0100
OK. Thanks for your feedback.

So, your explanation is clearer than the original.

One small additional comment. You write:

> [...] so it makes no sense to use
> it when your printer supports colors.

"No sense"?  In fact, I quite often print my documents in 
black-and-white only on  my color-printer.

Best regards,
Jon


On 30/11/2020 19.53, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Jon Krom <jon <at> krom.eu>
>> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:52:06 +0100
>>
>> On this web-page
>>
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/PostScript-Variables.html
>>
>> appears the sentence:
>>
>> "Alternatively, you can set ps-print-color-p to black-white to print
>> colors on black/white printers."
>>
>> Shouldn't this be:
>>
>> "Alternatively, you can set ps-print-color-p to black-white to print
>> black/white on color printers."
> 
> No, I don't think so.  This setting is supposed to produce a better
> looking printout on black/white printers, so it makes no sense to use
> it when your printer supports colors.
> 




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#44962; Package emacs. (Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:37:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 44962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: jon <at> krom.eu
Cc: 44962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#44962: Small mistake in emacs manual ?
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:35:52 +0200
> Cc: 44962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Jon Krom <jon <at> krom.eu>
> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:04:28 +0100
> 
> One small additional comment. You write:
> 
>  > [...] so it makes no sense to use
>  > it when your printer supports colors.
> 
> "No sense"?  In fact, I quite often print my documents in 
> black-and-white only on  my color-printer.

That corresponds to the value nil, not to the value black-and-white.
IOW, you want ps-print not to use colors at all.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#44962; Package emacs. (Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:44:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 44962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jon Krom <jon <at> krom.eu>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 44962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#44962: Small mistake in emacs manual ?
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:43:55 +0100
OK. Clear. Thanks.

Perhaps possible to clarify that in the documentation ?

Thanks, Regards and: Stay Healthy!
Jon


On 30/11/2020 20.35, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Cc: 44962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> From: Jon Krom <jon <at> krom.eu>
>> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:04:28 +0100
>>
>> One small additional comment. You write:
>>
>>   > [...] so it makes no sense to use
>>   > it when your printer supports colors.
>>
>> "No sense"?  In fact, I quite often print my documents in
>> black-and-white only on  my color-printer.
> 
> That corresponds to the value nil, not to the value black-and-white.
> IOW, you want ps-print not to use colors at all.
> 




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#44962; Package emacs. (Tue, 01 Dec 2020 09:01:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at 44962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jean Louis <bugs <at> gnu.support>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 44962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jon <at> krom.eu
Subject: Re: bug#44962: Small mistake in emacs manual ?
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:56:40 +0300
* Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> [2020-11-30 21:54]:
> > From: Jon Krom <jon <at> krom.eu>
> > Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:52:06 +0100
> > 
> > On this web-page
> > 
> > https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/PostScript-Variables.html
> > 
> > appears the sentence:
> > 
> > "Alternatively, you can set ps-print-color-p to black-white to print 
> > colors on black/white printers."
> > 
> > Shouldn't this be:
> > 
> > "Alternatively, you can set ps-print-color-p to black-white to print 
> > black/white on color printers."
> 
> No, I don't think so.  This setting is supposed to produce a better
> looking printout on black/white printers, so it makes no sense to use
> it when your printer supports colors.

Then maybe:

"Alternatively, you can set ps-print-color-p to black-white to produce
a better looking printout on black/white printers."






Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#44962; Package emacs. (Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:11:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #23 received at 44962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jon Krom <jon <at> krom.eu>
To: Jean Louis <bugs <at> gnu.support>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 44962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#44962: Small mistake in emacs manual ?
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:09:48 +0100

On 30/11/2020 19.56, Jean Louis wrote:
> * Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> [2020-11-30 21:54]:
>>> From: Jon Krom <jon <at> krom.eu>
>>> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:52:06 +0100
>>>
>>> On this web-page
>>>
>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/PostScript-Variables.html
>>>
>>> appears the sentence:
>>>
>>> "Alternatively, you can set ps-print-color-p to black-white to print
>>> colors on black/white printers."
>>>
>>> Shouldn't this be:
>>>
>>> "Alternatively, you can set ps-print-color-p to black-white to print
>>> black/white on color printers."
>>
>> No, I don't think so.  This setting is supposed to produce a better
>> looking printout on black/white printers, so it makes no sense to use
>> it when your printer supports colors.
> 
> Then maybe:
> 
> "Alternatively, you can set ps-print-color-p to black-white to produce
> a better looking printout on black/white printers."


Sounds good to me !




Reply sent to Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sat, 05 Dec 2020 10:22:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to jon <at> krom.eu:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Sat, 05 Dec 2020 10:22:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #28 received at 44962-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: jon <at> krom.eu
Cc: 44962-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#44962: Small mistake in emacs manual ?
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 12:20:39 +0200
> Cc: 44962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Jon Krom <jon <at> krom.eu>
> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:43:55 +0100
> 
> OK. Clear. Thanks.
> 
> Perhaps possible to clarify that in the documentation ?

Done.




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 02 Jan 2021 12:24:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 4 years and 165 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.