From unknown Sat Sep 06 13:45:00 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs) Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 44953 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 44953@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16066838401313 (code B ref -1); Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:04:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2020 21:04:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52762 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTrR-0000L2-V8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:04:00 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39828) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTrJ-0000Kc-Br for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:03:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59668) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTrJ-0004eO-3p for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:03:49 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:55058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTrD-0000qN-7u for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:03:48 -0500 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTqz-0005wa-KA; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:03:29 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:02:47 -0500 Message-ID: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.112.178.59; envelope-from=mhw@netris.org; helo=world.peace.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) In the 'lsof' test suite, the 'LTlock' test consistently fails on my system, possibly related to the fact that I use 'btrfs' for my local filesystems. Here's the relevant build log excerpt: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Optional tests: LTbigf ... OK LTdnlc ... /tmp/guix-build-lsof-4.94.0.drv-0/lsof-4.94.0-checkout/tests found: 100.00% OK LTlock ... lock mismatch: expected W, got " " lock mismatch: expected R, got " " lock mismatch: expected w, got " " lock mismatch: expected r, got " " Failed tests: 1 make: *** [Makefile:118: opt] Error 1 command "make" "standard" "optional" failed with status 2 note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-lsof-4.94.0.drv-0' builder for `/gnu/store/cgkl1prkfmaz7b7j37xlzyhh8nhqkdyw-lsof-4.94.0.drv' failed with exit code 1 build of /gnu/store/cgkl1prkfmaz7b7j37xlzyhh8nhqkdyw-lsof-4.94.0.drv failed --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The following commit made this into a fatal build error, which I agree is an improvement: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- commit 2bf502138c9c8cad945866061772fe0e1f4b7175 Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Date: Mon Nov 23 05:05:41 2020 +0100 gnu: lsof: Make test failures fatal. * gnu/packages/lsof.scm (lsof)[source]: Add patch to make test suite failures stop the build. * gnu/packages/patches/lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch: New file. * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Previously, the same test failure occurred on my system with lsof-4.91, but the failure was ignored and I didn't notice it until now. Before that, our lsof-4.89 package did not run the test suite, so I do not know if it had the same bug. Mark From unknown Sat Sep 06 13:45:00 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs) References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@netris.org> In-Reply-To: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@netris.org> Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 44953@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44953.16066851633274 (code B ref 44953); Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:27:02 +0000 Received: (at 44953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2020 21:26:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52774 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjUCo-0000qk-W7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:26:03 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:37598) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjUCn-0000qF-MP for 44953@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:26:02 -0500 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjUCh-0006NN-7w; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:25:55 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:25:13 -0500 Message-ID: <87wny3dfe3.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I should mention that 'gnome' depends on 'lsof' via the following dependency path (among others): gnome -> gnome-shell -> ruby-sass -> ruby-sass-spec -> ruby-terminfo -> ruby-rdoc -> ruby-rubocop -> ruby-parallel -> lsof Mark From unknown Sat Sep 06 13:45:00 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs) Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 44953@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org, 44953@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16066855973959 (code B ref -1); Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:34:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2020 21:33:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52782 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjUJp-00011m-0H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:33:17 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60138) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjUJn-00011f-Fq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:33:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjUJn-0006u3-8e for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:33:15 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:57746) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjUJl-0002Ks-1h for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:33:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=awLYcMJp3wtgYf7DYBiJ17Zp/ro5qgz1k0r1aHB+VEI=; h=date:in-reply-to: references:subject:cc:to:from; b=A09MKSgPNZ39fe1caQomcVPTMSDedGL8Q9Dj2 RWL+8vOEBO44a7gmoSui8R1c/8hZ5b2ZzcQZJfj2t7ygWCRbyQmFLwjSD5Bw5xkCdzzOso dNi+9ZeyuI1Hkm6xnr71QP007SId8X5a9/uKyG8mkp8jTVSFEE23mgO4YfQL06IWcuK4J/ zmEApcJFG9kQ5s9Ob8qh6e+Vtho9B9SyS45pyCqe2h4nQnnXS8t+tJORsfsS7Bszuy16RH wwFZCkOd+WOgCEYY5NaaF/ry6CGTYeyLNddMz/nq/26kyJYsWZ8zt7EXHkhpNm9gcfkELI hCrUaIWuKjPnkhJvxXnWNyh2A== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 23d08061 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:33:22 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@netris.org> In-reply-to: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@netris.org> Message-ID: <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 22:33:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark, Mark H Weaver =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > In the 'lsof' test suite, the 'LTlock' test consistently fails=20 > on my > system, possibly related to the fact that I use 'btrfs' for my=20 > local > filesystems. Thanks for the report! I can reproduce this by formatting a btrfs=20 image file and loop-mounting it to /tmp. This looks like an upstream bug to me. Do you have time to file=20 one? We're using the upstream=20 since Victor Abell retired. Alternatively we could disable this test in Guix =E2=80=98for now=E2=80=99 = with a=20 comment--but we both know how long it will remain unfixed. Side note: I tried to implement upstream's test workflow[0] but=20 got new failures (i.e. we're not running all the tests yet). I=20 haven't tried fixing those yet. Kind regards, T G-R [0]:=20 https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof/pull/144#issuecomment-732204193 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX8QTkQ0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15IcAA/0Q+oA76FwdyxAASLpvDtTBJJIZuivTWpLs1dCMI KPtWAQDBYcCYfqjkTTw9tFviD11U38ePYC3oxSE1RlBgt0AhAA== =msE2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Sep 06 13:45:00 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs) Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 01:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: 44953@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org, 44953@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.160669987925745 (code B ref -1); Mon, 30 Nov 2020 01:32:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2020 01:31:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52955 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjY2B-0006hA-4e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:31:19 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:54936) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjY26-0006gs-0L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:31:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50286) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjY25-0005cj-Q9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:31:13 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:34188) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjY21-0007bv-Qx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:31:13 -0500 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjY1x-0002bl-G6; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:31:05 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver In-Reply-To: <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx> References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@netris.org> <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:30:20 -0500 Message-ID: <87r1obd41k.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.112.178.59; envelope-from=mhw@netris.org; helo=world.peace.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi Tobias, Thanks for the super quick response and for reproducing the bug. > This looks like an upstream bug to me. Agreed. > Do you have time to file=20 > one? We're using the upstream=20 > since Victor Abell retired. I have time, but there's another problem: it appears that I cannot file a bug report on Github without first creating an account, which in turn requires me to formally agree to their legal agreement. Among other things, it includes an indemnification clause, meaning that I would have to promise to pay their legal fees if some dispute arises involving me and they decide to retain laywers to deal with it. They also claim the right to change the terms of the agreement at any time without notifying me, and by continuing to use the service I would implicitly agree to those new terms. I refuse to sign that agreement, which means that I cannot file bug reports on Github. Oh well. I don't actually care about 'lsof', except for the fact that our 'gnome' package depends on it. For now, I'll just disable the 'lsof' test suite on my private branch. > Alternatively we could disable this test in Guix =E2=80=98for now=E2=80= =99 with a > comment--but we both know how long it will remain unfixed. Sounds fine to me, unless someone who has already has a Github account wants to use it to file a bug. Thanks again, Mark From unknown Sat Sep 06 13:45:00 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs) Resent-From: raingloom Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 02:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mark H Weaver Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , 44953@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44953.160713367313696 (code B ref 44953); Sat, 05 Dec 2020 02:02:01 +0000 Received: (at 44953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2020 02:01:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46242 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klMsr-0003Yq-CI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 21:01:13 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:41038) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klMsl-0003Ye-6T for 44953@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 21:01:11 -0500 Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Cnt8c42dRzFd7h; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 18:01:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1607133664; bh=HncSRmfF2IFxQsz5uqYIOLUOqSZEjIuidOhb7x8gNZ0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lTKzBLmnq6xKdwJrWtuI/NeG5/kHEhVW4Cgw2aoyeQAVRYA3FRGlRS4jvw5G56Ovj fBPhmA1z+2J2anIvNn0YYnpHPpljhsPz7W3zl7bH3ogCiLXlQY5yMs3KL2+JXUmfig xnQwOxn4/J+46VkLhFwBTknXlakPNAaxRQF1gDLI= X-Riseup-User-ID: 400ED16BBD707AD9FED00AF9D574A500520AE4C69580575C79C834FA275788A6 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Cnt8Y2sv0zJn9m; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 18:00:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 02:57:36 +0100 From: raingloom Message-ID: <20201205025736.50b83726@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <87r1obd41k.fsf@netris.org> References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@netris.org> <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx> <87r1obd41k.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:30:20 -0500 Mark H Weaver wrote: > Hi Tobias, >=20 > Thanks for the super quick response and for reproducing the bug. >=20 > > This looks like an upstream bug to me. =20 >=20 > Agreed. >=20 > > Do you have time to file=20 > > one? We're using the upstream=20 > > since Victor Abell retired. =20 >=20 > I have time, but there's another problem: it appears that I cannot > file a bug report on Github without first creating an account, which > in turn requires me to formally agree to their legal agreement. > Among other things, it includes an indemnification clause, meaning > that I would have to promise to pay their legal fees if some dispute > arises involving me and they decide to retain laywers to deal with > it. They also claim the right to change the terms of the agreement > at any time without notifying me, and by continuing to use the > service I would implicitly agree to those new terms. >=20 > I refuse to sign that agreement, which means that I cannot file bug > reports on Github. Oh well. >=20 > I don't actually care about 'lsof', except for the fact that our > 'gnome' package depends on it. For now, I'll just disable the 'lsof' > test suite on my private branch. >=20 > > Alternatively we could disable this test in Guix =E2=80=98for now=E2=80= =99 with a > > comment--but we both know how long it will remain unfixed. =20 >=20 > Sounds fine to me, unless someone who has already has a Github account > wants to use it to file a bug. >=20 > Thanks again, > Mark >=20 >=20 >=20 My usual workaround to this is to do a shallow clone (git clone --depth 1) and look for frequently occuring email addresses in git log. Then I just send the bug/patch to them. It hasn't failed so far. From unknown Sat Sep 06 13:45:00 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs) Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 04:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: raingloom Cc: Mark H Weaver , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , 44953@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44953.163427133013188 (code B ref 44953); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 04:16:01 +0000 Received: (at 44953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2021 04:15:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37654 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mbEd0-0003Qe-LL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 00:15:30 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f181.google.com ([209.85.160.181]:43782) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mbEcy-0003QO-ND for 44953@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 00:15:28 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f181.google.com with SMTP id r17so7732284qtx.10 for <44953@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:15:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=JPzE/xmxAX6/4kJCAp9n/Ft44RaTg15KiSA+FEiUhXM=; b=Ct3zckmDfaAmZNhfg0keNfJK9PVphlkTogxly5Xj7jXDsdZLzIYClh+S7LvPlvIOQT QgVxqkr8GFf4r4kh+Ivo/1Z8UiP3ELpNiVjeuYuB52pS09BKJCiIk0bXbXcsFtStsRWh xqkJcE+XZhPPuVlkTuJ8cl9FlsbX8MhIANY+NyvhMM+5szNyXupM2zX/4QmC9GQqDd6l DxU4R9XY1lxRbBOJaCevBcJoBFuZJF4/B6KgHEeDiZ8J2ukVqWFoe4WoTrzDsISC80FC m37HVqgj+Q68MSRb38jRDLIHfxP/kbs6vvjmXcmK5maXyvrwhXlSV4OCK8sAnQx+2nLT FrzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=JPzE/xmxAX6/4kJCAp9n/Ft44RaTg15KiSA+FEiUhXM=; b=vb0DwWuVoRMSShS9lwmE58zv/hkRGL+pCbo7ZaPDVY+PVYNE/8Ri/BXAFrqQ1dZj3W JoknCUoqlg9ETTlbik+7qhmsJdR3SEjOR56T/dS15fFnOXvlTDa5T8TvNmZzTz60KPsJ UED9+H3Az6ABbeqjTjH9xFSdBYRTW2UsyGXOn/MRKQN94CyC2CVrmfPYpUAF2oghDXLa azO9FLNXNR2UfPxSuR0vrNkePkvlndZs1I3dj3UcvA4cix73l7nhRj1YlMCdGyN4ZTcT 9Go0b4B0Y/9H8MPFmxOnXzBxg4YxEi6/kmhRITuJAsCvpWG3GTFQkuUGCLUzPUqa6xJo 3Ndw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531LQoQ0Die249yOZkXEjKmXbkJ1c8SXEJ32rc6YfZcVcrbZcf9/ gypADoQkWPCg60HeVEDn3X5tqGbLw6Vm9Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMIAmCDkgA5p8XMyu7oWg3205sV/x0NbC2RQmawZo+b0gQ4SzWkjGv0Cb8GpuhS5l6Nq5hBQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1992:: with SMTP id u18mr11305308qtc.111.1634271322816; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:15:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-236-123-199.b2b2c.ca. [207.236.123.199]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u28sm1600447qtc.48.2021.10.14.21.15.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:15:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@netris.org> <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx> <87r1obd41k.fsf@netris.org> <20201205025736.50b83726@riseup.net> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 00:15:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20201205025736.50b83726@riseup.net> (raingloom@riseup.net's message of "Sat, 5 Dec 2020 02:57:36 +0100") Message-ID: <87zgranctj.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, For the record it seems Tobias had gotten around filing a bug here: https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof/issues/152. It seems the issue is real and a new Linux-specific tool lsfd is being devised. I guess we should disable the test, as the package is still probably mostly functional on Btrfs, and wait for a proper resolution from upstream? Mark, could you share your patch disabling the test if you still have it handy? Thanks, Maxim From unknown Sat Sep 06 13:45:00 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs) Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 04:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: raingloom Cc: Mark H Weaver , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , 44953@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44953.163427218914496 (code B ref 44953); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 04:30:02 +0000 Received: (at 44953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2021 04:29:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37665 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mbEqq-0003lk-U3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 00:29:49 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f173.google.com ([209.85.222.173]:36448) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mbEqo-0003lT-SI for 44953@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 00:29:47 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f173.google.com with SMTP id p4so7530280qki.3 for <44953@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:29:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=LCY2BhPzGxnRfgMTDVcEP2DNVdkqJ0cz1IGq7odFCVg=; b=Yz4BkKKDURfgbRwUhcP4UhjgqVQ5ZqUGZ4hCpk/D01wUgafyWvzSZXnOQL0ivVgJ3i uFyy9dLwMQ2b8BBCH3c7E8OxJb8fafyv6IdLmdkQQD2/l9YtkheD/y3sa3aUZvhZoWLo FmKdW3O57QqzqSY363JmypfGxqQdJebTyQmmlxUyATCBZMSZTJMI7iIEutSyjuD7i+hD bCN/9y7kOCJaHqVZftoT0u++17hY+C/uskl6M6lH7C5/PrSrNmlOv78lpfGlJN81RpqZ K5HGS0YrCqwUDvrvnAaCbqpNMKNq1tR+h/fTZrixZDz9MKDgG+DICBwFHWIehuZOd6jr OVWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=LCY2BhPzGxnRfgMTDVcEP2DNVdkqJ0cz1IGq7odFCVg=; b=cwiIefz38SNx/YyHsyTY8q9mWXWTGsVTDbfOwoWS0IPDvTWjLAN+KufPnG8pzYVUOY NmX1L+GJsdB/YLZ42EEmSM+z9E3qS82kQ6Yjap40soXswfftSrRB58kfF67E+X4e9eti zwDBVNnP9CHGH45bUuImXMtlQWXhL0+CefgfLXf1mEtZNjo5jQ1XlUsdp/1w1IH/tpTM iUQ+ppsiMorZXcIvUkIR4ljpWnpfWeFB0gltC+v/sfrZyQXHtHjzoPMtumBOKXnoBrtw 4UgrPTmY2q6T5nCdsWIpby6r5J1uxjt6p6WKNIDxe9GI1nnmFlmKPOlsjcqBPtTI6ui1 6ayg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531YWo3qo0ZGnEOLYywezRGS6ERkGeGzBbJFuhEGoBrGJU7Cq2go ZZ6usJ22aWc+WBdLdc7+XE3YP6abwiNevg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6wAIiBVAB9B+X4UEh42Se5MfKDmNQzvsLJ61hEG7E+twbQ60ESgnGvmbXnClmCHVerImSqg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:ac2:: with SMTP id 185mr8160388qkk.446.1634272181128; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-236-123-199.b2b2c.ca. [207.236.123.199]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v22sm2152651qkf.79.2021.10.14.21.29.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:29:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@netris.org> <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx> <87r1obd41k.fsf@netris.org> <20201205025736.50b83726@riseup.net> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 00:29:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20201205025736.50b83726@riseup.net> (raingloom@riseup.net's message of "Sat, 5 Dec 2020 02:57:36 +0100") Message-ID: <87v91ync5t.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello again, Mark, I've figured it out and disabled it locally. Will push shortly to core-updates-frozen. Thanks! Maxim From unknown Sat Sep 06 13:45:00 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs) Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxim Cournoyer , raingloom Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , 44953@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44953.163428921311159 (code B ref 44953); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:14:01 +0000 Received: (at 44953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2021 09:13:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38082 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mbJHQ-0002tv-Iq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 05:13:32 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:51484) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mbJHM-0002te-2R for 44953@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 05:13:31 -0400 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mbJHF-0003Mj-8a; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 05:13:21 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver In-Reply-To: <87zgranctj.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@netris.org> <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx> <87r1obd41k.fsf@netris.org> <20201205025736.50b83726@riseup.net> <87zgranctj.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 05:11:20 -0400 Message-ID: <871r4mbqjw.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi Maxim, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > For the record it seems Tobias had gotten around filing a bug here: > https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof/issues/152. > > It seems the issue is real and a new Linux-specific tool lsfd is being > devised. I guess we should disable the test, as the package is still > probably mostly functional on Btrfs, and wait for a proper resolution > from upstream? > > Mark, could you share your patch disabling the test if you still have it > handy? Here's what I did on my private branch, which has diverged quite a bit from master, so I don't know whether it will apply cleanly. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline; filename=0001-Revert-gnu-lsof-Make-test-failures-fatal.patch Content-Description: [PATCH] Revert "gnu: lsof: Make test failures fatal." >From 1a658341538b8ea1470ef1bd02dfb3922011df79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark H Weaver Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:03:57 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Revert "gnu: lsof: Make test failures fatal." This reverts commit 2bf502138c9c8cad945866061772fe0e1f4b7175. --- gnu/local.mk | 1 - gnu/packages/lsof.scm | 3 +- .../patches/lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch | 58 ------------------- 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 61 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch diff --git a/gnu/local.mk b/gnu/local.mk index eaa358266a..f53ceb35e9 100644 --- a/gnu/local.mk +++ b/gnu/local.mk @@ -1378,7 +1378,6 @@ dist_patch_DATA = \ %D%/packages/patches/lm-sensors-hwmon-attrs.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/lrcalc-includes.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/lsh-fix-x11-forwarding.patch \ - %D%/packages/patches/lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/lua-CVE-2014-5461.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/lua-pkgconfig.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/lua51-liblua-so.patch \ diff --git a/gnu/packages/lsof.scm b/gnu/packages/lsof.scm index b317902ee7..3e527a272f 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/lsof.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/lsof.scm @@ -41,8 +41,7 @@ (commit version))) (file-name (git-file-name name version)) (sha256 - (base32 "0yxv2jg6rnzys49lyrz9yjb4knamah4xvlqj596y6ix3vm4k3chp")) - (patches (search-patches "lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch")))) + (base32 "0yxv2jg6rnzys49lyrz9yjb4knamah4xvlqj596y6ix3vm4k3chp")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (native-inputs `(("groff" ,groff) ; for soelim diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch deleted file mode 100644 index e874ba6ad4..0000000000 --- a/gnu/packages/patches/lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,58 +0,0 @@ -From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice -Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 05:36:53 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH] gnu: lsof: Make test failures fatal. - -Submitted upstream[0]. - -[0]: https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof/pull/144 - -diff --git a/tests/Makefile b/tests/Makefile -index 08574a0..2923bb8 100644 ---- a/tests/Makefile -+++ b/tests/Makefile -@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ all: ${CKTSTDB} ${BASTST} ${STDTST} FRC - exit 1 ;\ - fi - @rm -f config.LT* -- -@err=0; \ -+ @err=0; \ - echo ""; \ - echo "Basic test:"; \ - ./${BASTST}; \ -@@ -54,8 +54,11 @@ all: ${CKTSTDB} ${BASTST} ${STDTST} FRC - echo "Suggestion: try the optional tests: \"make opt\""; \ - echo ""; \ - fi; \ -- fi; -- @rm -f config.LT* -+ fi; \ -+ rm -f config.LT*; \ -+ if [ $$err -ne 0 ]; then \ -+ exit 1; \ -+ fi - - auto: ckDB silent FRC - -@@ -112,7 +115,7 @@ LTunix: LTunix.c ${CONFIG} ${LIBOBJ} ${HDR} config.ldflags - - opt: ${CKTSTDB} ${OPTTST} FRC - @rm -f config.LT* -- -@err=0; \ -+ @err=0; \ - echo ""; \ - echo "Optional tests:"; \ - for i in ${OPTTST}; do \ -@@ -126,8 +129,11 @@ opt: ${CKTSTDB} ${OPTTST} FRC - else \ - echo "All optional tests succeeded."; \ - fi; \ -- echo ""; -- @rm -f config.LT* -+ echo ""; \ -+ rm -f config.LT*; \ -+ if [ $$err -ne 0 ]; then \ -+ exit 1; \ -+ fi - - optional: opt - -- 2.31.1 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain -- Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice but very few check the facts. Ask me about . --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Sep 06 13:45:00 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#44953: closed (Re: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs)) Message-ID: References: <87o7z1h6pw.fsf@gmail.com> <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@netris.org> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 44953 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 44953@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 21:24:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1654809842-25835-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1654809842-25835-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs) which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 44953@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 44953: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D44953 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1654809842-25835-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 44953-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2022 21:23:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48003 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nzPcZ-0006hZ-O3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 17:23:15 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-f49.google.com ([209.85.219.49]:37722) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nzPcY-0006hN-Tg for 44953-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 17:23:15 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-f49.google.com with SMTP id o43so318261qvo.4 for <44953-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 14:23:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=6A8siaJH6scYrk59Yw5TNC4iFSN5FTZuYAcJPyBKryk=; b=EE8LbdL5T0Oj9ErYPnXaZcoZ8xX2BmU8SKZIjYZ8gckpNjTqQYR0EsTibeK6qc8wNv XxP1uRQtOo7jLq6fJgEA9KlGkxxP54PXvNI1Md0tyNkdGRxC8CxHyj+L2cJ0whXeTJCe xa+RRgPRvM09BxgoMHUSgar9qhpgiyfPzQFW4Y0qjRVYtN1VsFF7y8ZMnBgRRjJmp8sJ TP6imQrzXIBk5VnbLVTQ4PruG3a63O2RGZN1A/xbv91wQ8P96xGSpnhRmFQSclJgfmia d0bTVObGQzMthVLrhl6+MdRgCkMZfpb5GJ3IpJoClQyQNrqTVK8jIs7l9U6wO/Gfzsml y4PA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=6A8siaJH6scYrk59Yw5TNC4iFSN5FTZuYAcJPyBKryk=; b=rHfTwvnU5MJFABII+SqyZDBDGhD5RfEiyypzGnNTGjzdEyHBhQojn0NCzGojrl/1lQ Ai16O9Cxhb2HlzWRVubjhQQJ/ASnDBWZRcxLmMutOaJyc7tqoqrPafMEp5PPZm5Kx/JI CjLkpTZhF369ZAFvpN2llgs5TBjBYx10vOV0bCHmHlBG88y3BlFBzBoATgaPlZNy1dEF 4uYneE++C8kKXniRD4oJDz6Mo/8W3H66O9ICJIs8Xf6+DuHOfSsps/HT7lv03vLo8l6M +in/JEMtqAy7ulwrcVQPbTU3rZSySgfzIwkot612TJzReVHhTMkZCjVxfwFTf331orba 3+eQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531r2tbxJ4SRtmyvCLgJVFP7MmJR5AUB4tPnt21Tq6drjkgiUPl2 udoE0kvmZpo1d+Xlb0geAxcX+TeK+uWGgdlJ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyf2OGWQH5fvI9B+Ce590159wF1VQOzX9OoHazF20y5tbEHRWQWMMq521CUTCIKwDxL+v63xA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2406:b0:464:41bb:3582 with SMTP id fv6-20020a056214240600b0046441bb3582mr30862657qvb.3.1654809788849; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 14:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-155-254.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.155.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w4-20020a05620a444400b006a6278a2b31sm10922783qkp.75.2022.06.09.14.23.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Jun 2022 14:23:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: raingloom Subject: Re: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs) References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@netris.org> <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx> <87r1obd41k.fsf@netris.org> <20201205025736.50b83726@riseup.net> <87v91ync5t.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 17:23:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87v91ync5t.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Fri, 15 Oct 2021 00:29:34 -0400") Message-ID: <87o7z1h6pw.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44953-done Cc: Mark H Weaver , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , 44953-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Hello again, > > Mark, I've figured it out and disabled it locally. Will push shortly to > core-updates-frozen. core-updates-frozen was merged into master long ago :-) Closing. Maxim ------------=_1654809842-25835-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2020 21:04:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52762 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTrR-0000L2-V8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:04:00 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39828) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTrJ-0000Kc-Br for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:03:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59668) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTrJ-0004eO-3p for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:03:49 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:55058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTrD-0000qN-7u for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:03:48 -0500 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTqz-0005wa-KA; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:03:29 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:02:47 -0500 Message-ID: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.112.178.59; envelope-from=mhw@netris.org; helo=world.peace.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) In the 'lsof' test suite, the 'LTlock' test consistently fails on my system, possibly related to the fact that I use 'btrfs' for my local filesystems. Here's the relevant build log excerpt: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Optional tests: LTbigf ... OK LTdnlc ... /tmp/guix-build-lsof-4.94.0.drv-0/lsof-4.94.0-checkout/tests found: 100.00% OK LTlock ... lock mismatch: expected W, got " " lock mismatch: expected R, got " " lock mismatch: expected w, got " " lock mismatch: expected r, got " " Failed tests: 1 make: *** [Makefile:118: opt] Error 1 command "make" "standard" "optional" failed with status 2 note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-lsof-4.94.0.drv-0' builder for `/gnu/store/cgkl1prkfmaz7b7j37xlzyhh8nhqkdyw-lsof-4.94.0.drv' failed with exit code 1 build of /gnu/store/cgkl1prkfmaz7b7j37xlzyhh8nhqkdyw-lsof-4.94.0.drv failed --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The following commit made this into a fatal build error, which I agree is an improvement: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- commit 2bf502138c9c8cad945866061772fe0e1f4b7175 Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Date: Mon Nov 23 05:05:41 2020 +0100 gnu: lsof: Make test failures fatal. * gnu/packages/lsof.scm (lsof)[source]: Add patch to make test suite failures stop the build. * gnu/packages/patches/lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch: New file. * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Previously, the same test failure occurred on my system with lsof-4.91, but the failure was ignored and I didn't notice it until now. Before that, our lsof-4.89 package did not run the test suite, so I do not know if it had the same bug. Mark ------------=_1654809842-25835-1--