GNU bug report logs - #44891
Chromium does not start

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Andrea Rossi <p <at> a9i.it>
Subject: bug#44891: closed (Re: bug#44891: Chromium does not start)
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:30:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#44891: Chromium does not start

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 44891 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
44891: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=44891
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Giovanni Biscuolo <g <at> xelera.eu>
To: Andrea Rossi <p <at> a9i.it>, 44891-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#44891: Chromium does not start
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:29:12 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Andrea Rossi via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> writes:

> On 27/11/20 09:32, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
>> [...]
>> 1. sudo sysctl -w kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone=1
>> 2. sudo su -c "echo 'kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone=1' > /etc/sysctl.d/00-local-userns.conf" 
>
> It works!

Fine! Closing this bug.

Ciao, Gio'

-- 
Giovanni Biscuolo

Xelera IT Infrastructures

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Andrea Rossi <p <at> a9i.it>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Chromium does not start
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:53:29 +0100

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,
after the installation of ungoogled-chromium I tried to run it,
receiving this message:

[20998:20998:1126/122306.639343:FATAL:zygote_host_impl_linux.cc(117)] No
usable sandbox! Update your kernel or see
https://chromium.9oo91esource.qjz9zk/chromium/src/+/master/docs/linux/suid_sandbox_development.md
for more information on developing with the SUID sandbox. If you want to
live dangerously and need an immediate workaround, you can try using
--no-sandbox.

Maybe I'm missing something, or is the case of a proper bug?

Regards,
-- 
Andrea

[OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.