From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:27:28 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44881: glib build fail for armhf Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 44881 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 44881@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.160638311024400 (code B ref -1); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:32:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2020 09:31:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38413 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiDd0-0006LT-ED for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 04:31:50 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:55918) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiDcy-0006LM-H3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 04:31:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56082) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiDcy-0003t4-AH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 04:31:48 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38274) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiDcx-0005RN-OJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 04:31:48 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:d8de:85a5:6a89:f30] (port=43788 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kiDcx-0006k7-4X for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 04:31:47 -0500 From: Mathieu Othacehe Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:31:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87blfkihvi.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, The glib build is broken on armhf due to a timeout in the test suite, see: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/m6rd864j30khc6k60gr2wqr1pz40f1di-glib-2.62.6-bin. It looks like it's also broken on the 1.2.0 branch. This prevents the evaluation of the guix-modular specification, see: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/19035/log/raw. I disabled the armhf-linux system for that specification until this is understood. Thanks, Mathieu From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:27:28 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44881: glib build fail for armhf Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44881 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mathieu Othacehe Cc: 44881@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44881-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44881.16064753237614 (code B ref 44881); Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:09:02 +0000 Received: (at 44881) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2020 11:08:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44127 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kibcJ-0001yj-Em for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 06:08:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48292) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kibcE-0001yP-8c for 44881@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 06:08:41 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40036) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kibc9-0008GK-4Z for 44881@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 06:08:33 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=46764 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kibc8-0000Oo-DL; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 06:08:32 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87blfkihvi.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 7 Frimaire an 229 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:08:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87blfkihvi.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:31:45 +0100") Message-ID: <87lfent5u8.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Mathieu, Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > The glib build is broken on armhf due to a timeout in the test suite, > see: > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/m6rd864j30khc6k60gr2wqr1pz40f1di-glib-2.62.6-= bin. > > It looks like it's also broken on the 1.2.0 branch. Yeah. We were discussing it with Chris Baines on IRC. My hypothesis is that those tests time out on low-end ARMv7 devices (like guix-x15.sjd.se). Previously, we were building them on the more powerful OverDrives probably, and indeed, the tests pass there. Berlin now has a substiute for this one built on an OverDrive. > This prevents the evaluation of the guix-modular specification, see: > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/19035/log/raw. I disabled the armhf-linux > system for that specification until this is understood. I think we can re-enable it now? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:27:28 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44881: glib build fail for armhf Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 09:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44881 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 44881@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44881-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44881.160681620627391 (code B ref 44881); Tue, 01 Dec 2020 09:51:02 +0000 Received: (at 44881) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2020 09:50:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57886 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kk2IP-00077i-J1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 04:50:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38142) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kk2IN-000778-Lp for 44881@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 04:50:04 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kk2II-0004fA-ET; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 04:49:58 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:d91d:e880:959c:e46b] (port=50016 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kk2IF-0002N7-GD; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 04:49:58 -0500 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <87blfkihvi.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfent5u8.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:49:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87lfent5u8.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:08:31 +0100") Message-ID: <87o8jd3lfh.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hey Ludo, >> This prevents the evaluation of the guix-modular specification, see: >> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/19035/log/raw. I disabled the armhf-linux >> system for that specification until this is understood. > > I think we can re-enable it now? Sure, I enabled it again. Maybe we should consider disabling those tests on core-updates then. Thanks, Mathieu