GNU bug report logs - #44854
[PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>

Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:35:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: fixed, patch

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #47 received at 44854 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, Stefan Kangas
 <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 44854 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:39:20 -0800 (PST)
> AFAIK, this is a typical example of Drew's reaction to a suggested change: oppose it without even the vaguest understanding of what the change is about.
> 
> I recommend you ignore his deluge of messages which tend to just hijack
> the discussion or at least derail it.

(Ignoring the ad hominem attack.  Ideas please, not
people.)

I tried to understand it.  I looked at the patch and
the source code.  I asked what files this applies to.
I got no explanation of what this really does (or why).
Is it so obvious what the effect is?  It wasn't/isn't
to me.

And I said from the very beginning that I wasn't sure
I understand it, and I asked for clarification.

I responded to the question asking if anyone has a
problem with the proposed change, by saying that IF
my understanding of it is correct (and I stated my
understanding) THEN yes, I would object.

FWIW, Eli too asked what the benefits are - what this
is really for.  Haven't seen an answer to that either.

(I'm not suggesting that Eli, like me, had difficulty
understanding what this does.)




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 199 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.