GNU bug report logs - #44834
27.1; Tcl mode enforces bad indentation following proc within a namespace

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Morgan Willcock <mwillcock <at> precedence.co.uk>

Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:18:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: fixed, patch

Merged with 44083

Found in versions 27.0.50, 27.1

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #79 received at 44834 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: rms <at> gnu.org
Cc: anticrisisg <at> gmail.com, larsi <at> gnus.org, 44834 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 dgutov <at> yandex.ru
Subject: Re: bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in
 namespace
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:08:46 +0200

> From: Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, anticrisisg <at> gmail.com, 44834 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
> 	dgutov <at> yandex.ru
> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:32:42 -0500
> 
>   > FTR, the text now says:
> 
>   >   Once the cumulative amount of your submissions exceeds about 15 lines
>   >   of non-trivial code you added or changed (not counting deleted lines),
>   >   we will need you to assign to the FSF the copyright for your
>   >   contributions.  Ask on emacs-devel <at> gnu.org, and we will send you the
>   >   necessary form together with the instructions to fill and email it, in
>   >   order to start this legal paperwork.
> 
> Thanks.  Please make it this:
> 
>   >   Once the cumulative amount of your submissions exceeds about 10
>   >   new or modified nontrivial lines of code, we will need you to
>   >   assign to the FSF the copyright for your contributions.  (If a
>   >   line contains a symbol, consider it nontrivial.)  Ask on
>   >   emacs-devel <at> gnu.org, and we will send you the necessary form
>   >   together with the instructions to fill and email it, in order to
>   >   start this legal paperwork.

Why remove the note about not counting deleted lines?  I agree that in
principle "new or modified" covers that, but how many readers will
immediately understand that "modified" doesn't include "deleted"?  I
put that there to make it clear; is there a reason not to say that
explicitly?
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 90 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.