GNU bug report logs - #44806
[PATCH staging 0/6] Add Pitivi

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>

Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 20:35:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #41 received at 44806 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 44806 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#44806] [PATCH staging 5/6] gnu: Add pitivi.
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:55:17 +0100
Am Dienstag, den 15.12.2020, 02:25 -0500 schrieb Leo Famulari:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 09:36:24PM +0100, Leo Prikler wrote:
> > * gnu/packages/video.scm (pitivi): New variable.
> 
> Overall LGTM.
> 
> > +        ("gst-plugins-bad"
> > +         ,(gst-plugins/selection gst-plugins-bad
> > +                                 #:plugins '("debugutils"
> > "transcoder")
> > +                                 #:configure-flags '("-
> > Dintrospection=enabled")))
> > +                  ;; We've only added inputs for what Pitivi deems
> > either
> > +                  ;; necessary or optional.  Let the user's
> > packages take
> > +                  ;; precedence in case they have e.g. the full
> > gst-plugins-bad.
> > +                  `("GST_PLUGIN_SYSTEM_PATH" suffix
> > +                    (,(getenv "GST_PLUGIN_SYSTEM_PATH")))))
> 
> Do we do this to save space? Or to avoid the rest of the bad plugins?
Both would be valid reasons to do this imo.  Adding more bad plugins is
likely also not going to increase the number of features Pitivi offers.





This bug report was last modified 4 years and 143 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.