GNU bug report logs - #44675
guix lint: support for spellchecker or basic grammar

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#44675: closed (guix lint: support for spellchecker or basic
 grammar)
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 21:42:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:41:20 -0700
with message-id <87bl3eqewv.fsf <at> yucca>
and subject line Re: bug#44675: guix lint: support for spellchecker or basic grammar
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #44675,
regarding guix lint: support for spellchecker or basic grammar
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
44675: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=44675
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: guix lint: support for spellchecker or basic grammar
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 17:53:53 -0800

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Please consider a guix lint description/synopsis check for basic
spelling, typo and rudimentary grammar issues.

Most of the ones I've found were caught by debian's "lintian" tool:

  https://tracker.debian.org/lintian


Common issues appear to be:

  "This packages" -> "This package"
  "allows to X" -> "Xs" or "Xing"


I've fixed many of these in the past:

  git log --author=vagrant --extended-regexp --grep='spelling|typo|grammar' --patch

But some of the very same patterns keep reappearing!


Many of these are likely to be caught by most spell checking routines;
I'm not sure if there is anything that would be implementable in pure
guile, or it if would make sense to call out to an external
spellchecker.

Some of them might be harder, and obviously we do not want too many
false positives, but no need to get perfectionist on solving this; even
just checking for "This packages" would haved detected many of these
issues!

That is, of course, if "guix lint" is being used consistently... :)


live well,
  vagrant

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 44675-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#44675: guix lint: support for spellchecker or basic grammar
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:41:20 -0700

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

On 2021-10-24, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2021-10-24, zimoun wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 at 04:22, Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org> wrote:
>>>   "This packages", "This modules", "allows to" and "permits to" in package
>>>   descriptions.
>>> * tests/lint.scm: Add tests for "This packages" and "allows to".
>>> ---
>>>  guix/lint.scm  | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  tests/lint.scm | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>>
>> Otherwise, LGTM.
>
> Shall I fix the above typo (the irony!) and push before we get any more
> of these typos in the repository? :)

Pushed to master as b5f45a21c27b80210753e184e52708bb75a347bb.

Thanks for all your help!


live well,
  vagrant

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.