GNU bug report logs -
#44675
guix lint: support for spellchecker or basic grammar
Previous Next
Reported by: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 01:55:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: easy
Done: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Control: tags 44675 +patch
On 2020-11-15, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Please consider a guix lint description/synopsis check for basic
> spelling, typo and rudimentary grammar issues.
...
> Many of these are likely to be caught by most spell checking routines;
> I'm not sure if there is anything that would be implementable in pure
> guile, or it if would make sense to call out to an external
> spellchecker.
>
> Some of them might be harder, and obviously we do not want too many
> false positives, but no need to get perfectionist on solving this; even
> just checking for "This packages" would haved detected many of these
> issues!
In the attached patch, I've implemented a simple lint check for "This
packages", which has been fixed in ... 42 packages so far in the git
repository, so maybe this could help catch future ones!
I haven't implemented a more complicated spellchecker or grammar checker
or anything, but at least this is a start.
I think it is also within my skills to address "allows to" and "permits
to", if I'm not heading down the wrong path here...
live well,
vagrant
[0001-lint-Add-description-check-for-check-pluralized-pack.patch (text/x-diff, inline)]
From d4b851f5722cd6f8d514a4254884d1f7a016b74f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:26:45 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] lint: Add description check for check-pluralized-package
Fixes: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/44675
* guix/lint.scm: Check for occurances of "This packages" in package
descriptions.
* tests/lint.scm: Add test.
---
guix/lint.scm | 9 +++++++++
tests/lint.scm | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/guix/lint.scm b/guix/lint.scm
index 1bebfe03d3..ffeac18077 100644
--- a/guix/lint.scm
+++ b/guix/lint.scm
@@ -221,6 +221,14 @@ markup is valid return a plain-text version of DESCRIPTION, otherwise #f."
(G_ "Texinfo markup in description is invalid")
#:field 'description))))
+ (define (check-pluralized-this-package description)
+ "Check that DESCRIPTION does not contain This packages"
+ (if (string-match "This packages" description)
+ (list
+ (make-warning package
+ (G_ "description contains This Packages but should just be This package")))
+ '()))
+
(define (check-trademarks description)
"Check that DESCRIPTION does not contain '™' or '®' characters. See
http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Trademarks.html."
@@ -283,6 +291,7 @@ by two spaces; possible infraction~p at ~{~a~^, ~}")
(check-not-empty description)
(check-quotes description)
(check-trademarks description)
+ (check-pluralized-this-package description)
;; Use raw description for this because Texinfo rendering
;; automatically fixes end of sentence space.
(check-end-of-sentence-space description)
diff --git a/tests/lint.scm b/tests/lint.scm
index a2c8665142..6cb7a98686 100644
--- a/tests/lint.scm
+++ b/tests/lint.scm
@@ -160,6 +160,13 @@
(description "This is a 'quoted' thing."))))
(check-description-style pkg))))
+(test-equal "description: pluralized this package"
+ "description contains This Packages but should just be This package"
+ (single-lint-warning-message
+ (let ((pkg (dummy-package "x"
+ (description "This packages is a typo."))))
+ (check-description-style pkg))))
+
(test-equal "synopsis: not a string"
"invalid synopsis: #f"
(single-lint-warning-message
--
2.30.2
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 292 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.