GNU bug report logs - #44656
[PATCH] Upgrade pypy3

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Lars-Dominik Braun <lars <at> 6xq.net>

Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:40:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #46 received at 44656 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars-Dominik Braun <lars <at> 6xq.net>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 44656 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#44656] [PATCH] Upgrade pypy3
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 16:25:29 +0200
Hi zimoun,

> What do you mean?  Using ’package-with-explicit-python’ on a package
> will replace the Python used by the ’python-build-system’ for all the
> dependencies.  Modulo the issues what C extension, if one wants the
> Python packages bytecompiled with PyPy, using a manifest containing:
true, that’s what I meant and why I mentioned Python 2 (we used to do it
for every single Python 2 package, so they are installable on their own).

> …similarly as replacing the Emacs VM [0], I guess some packages
> will be broken.  Well, for instance if some packages use
> ’python-minimal’ instead of ’python’, the replacement will not happen.
> Last, is it an issue to rewrite too much?
Yes, rewriting too much is a problem, because Python is used alot you
end up rebuilding everything, starting from the bootstrap binaries. And
then it’s not even sure you’ll be able to build all the way up to the
package you actually want, because our Python and PyPy packages actually
implement different versions of the Python language/standard library
(3.8 vs 3.7).

Cheers,
Lars





This bug report was last modified 3 years and 276 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.