GNU bug report logs - #44597
26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Francesco Potortì <pot <at> gnu.org>

Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:31:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 26.3

Done: Roland Winkler <winkler <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Francesco Potortì <pot <at> gnu.org>
Subject: bug#44597: closed (Re: bug#44597: 26.3; bibtex should allow
 reverse sorting)
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 06:30:03 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#44597: 26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 44597 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
44597: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=44597
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Roland Winkler <winkler <at> gnu.org>
To: Francesco Potorti <pot <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, 44597-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#44597: 26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 00:29:35 -0600
On Fri, Dec 18 2020, Roland Winkler wrote:
> Thanks.  To simplify things, I just installed my patch for
> user-defined sorting schemes.  Even if it does not provide an
> easy-to-use solution, it should cover even the most exotic
> scenarios.

Closing.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Francesco Potortì <pot <at> gnu.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:30:14 +0100
I wish bibtex mode would allow for reverse sorting of entries.

Some years ago I used to obtain that behaviour by advising the sort-subr
functions when called inside a bibtex-mode buffer.  No more.

The modern bibtex.el sorts an entry when bibtex-clean-entry is called
when bibtex-maintain-sorted-entries is t without calling sort-subr, but
relying only on bibtex-lessp, which is not easy to advice.

I have numbered labels, and I want them to stay in reverse order as they
are, but now I can get that behaviour only by setting
bibtex-maintain-sorted-entries to nil

Please add some way to reverse the order of entries

--
fp



This bug report was last modified 2 years and 200 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.