GNU bug report logs -
#44597
26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting
Previous Next
Reported by: Francesco Potortì <pot <at> gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:31:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 26.3
Done: Roland Winkler <winkler <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Francesco Potortì <pot <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>Yes, I think introducing a variable to control the sorting would be a
>>good idea. It'd default to `bibtex-lessp' (or rather, something that
>>does the same), but (as you say) have an input that makes implementing
>>other sorting functions easier.
>>
>>Patches welcome. :-)
>
> This is a patch that improves things, in my opinion. This is not the
> ideal situation I mentioned above, but "il meglio è il nemico del bene"
> (best is enemy of good). So here you are, this one satisfies my needs
> and is hoefully a step towards a more general solution.
[...]
> Allowed non-nil values are:
> -plain or t All entries are sorted alphabetically.
> +plain or t Entries are sorted alphabetically.
> +reverse Entries are sorted in reverse alphabetic order.
> +date Entries are sorted by date.
> +reversedate Entries are reverse sorted by date, starting with newest.
Thanks; this looks like a good feature to me. I've added Roland to the
Cc's; I'm guessing he'll have some comments.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 200 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.