GNU bug report logs - #44578
incompability between preview and hyperref in latex 2020-10-01

Previous Next

Full log

Message #146 received at 44578 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
To: Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp>
Cc: dak <at> gnu.org, "Bruckmann, Tobias" <tobias.bruckmann <at> uni-due.de>,
 44578 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, hugo.raguet <at> insa-cvl.fr, Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#44578: AW: bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 11:48:27 +0100

Hi all,

Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp> writes:

> I can reproduce on TeX Live what Hugo and Tobias say.
>
> It seems that the usage of "example-image" is the source of trouble. In
> that case, I find in the log that "example-image.tex" is read in, not
> "example-image.eps".
>
>> I have no clue about pstools, so I copied the image next to the tex file
>> so that it can write the eps-image-name.tex file.  Then it complained
>> about missing tikzpicture, 
>
> That's because "example-image.tex" contains tikzpicture environment. So
> I infer that "example-image" isn't suitable to specify as an argument to
> \psfragfig.

I think this is a documented feature of pstool:

    \psfragfig <suffix> [<opts>] {<filename>}
    This catch-all macro is designed to support a wide range of graphics
    naming schemes.  It inserts an eps file named either
    <filename>-psfrag.eps or <filename>.eps (in that order of preference),
    and uses psfrag definitions contained within either
    <filename>-psfrag.tex or <filename>.tex.

IIUC, the problem is that the MWE provided is off.  This all needs a
file which provides psfrag macros which will be replaced in the .eps.
This is at least my understanding (and my apologies in advance if I'm
totally wrong here).

Best, Arash

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.