GNU bug report logs - #44566
27.1; time bug at Gnus

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: 황병희 <soyeomul <at> doraji.xyz>

Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 02:57:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo

Found in version 27.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: 황병희 <soyeomul <at> doraji.xyz>
To: "Peder O. Klingenberg" <peder <at> news.klingenberg.no>
Cc: 44566 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#44566: 27.1; time bug at Gnus
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 21:22:34 +0900
Dear Peder,

"Peder O. Klingenberg" <peder <at> news.klingenberg.no> writes:

> On on., 2020-11-11 kl. 12.14 +0100 +0100, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>
>> Perhaps it'd be better if you described precisely what you think the
>> problem is (by giving us example Date headers) instead of posting
>> screenshots and asking us to guess what you think the problem is?
>
> Seems obvious to me.  Two screenshots, taken 30-ish seconds apart.  In
> the first, an archive copy of a message, with a Date header like so:
>
> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:18:55 +0900 (22 minutes, 6 seconds ago)
>
> Second, the NNTP edition of the same message, with a date header like
> this:
>
> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:18:55 CET (8 hours, 22 minutes, 37 seconds ago)
>
> The second timestamp is transposed to CET, but describes the same point
> in time as the first.  The thing between the parenthesis, calculated by
> gnus, should therefore obviously be the same, modulo the seconds between
> the screenshots.  It's not.  The difference is the same as the
> difference between time zones +0900 and CET, so it's not unlikely that
> somewhere Gnus drops the TZ information.
>
>
> ...Peder...

Thank you for good explain!!!

Sincerely, Byung-Hee

-- 
^고맙습니다 _和合團結_ 감사합니다_^))//




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 218 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.