From unknown Sun Aug 10 09:46:12 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#44552 <44552@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#44552 <44552@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl? Reply-To: bug#44552 <44552@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 16:46:12 +0000 retitle 44552 Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl? reassign 44552 guix submitter 44552 Pierre Neidhardt severity 44552 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 10 07:53:31 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Nov 2020 12:53:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36676 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcT9P-0005bK-Cf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 07:53:31 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:59902) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcT9N-0005bC-1P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 07:53:29 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcT9M-0003fd-PB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 07:53:28 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:52365) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcT9K-0005T1-B9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 07:53:28 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 90.92.160.122 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1094-122.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.160.122]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B440FE0004; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:53:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl? Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 13:53:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87sg9hida6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.196; envelope-from=mail@ambrevar.xyz; helo=relay4-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/10 07:53:23 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: 26 X-Spam_score: 2.6 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam_report: (2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.499, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=1.999, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: See https://github.com/alex-gutev/generic-cl/issues/6 The space size of our current SBCL package is 2Gb. Shall we increase it to 5Gb? What about adding an option to the build system to pass extra parameters to SBCL? Then we could pass "--dynamic-space-size=5000" just for generic-cl. Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 2.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Guillaume Le Vaillant X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable See https://github.com/alex-gutev/generic-cl/issues/6 The space size of our current SBCL package is 2Gb. Shall we increase it to 5Gb? What about adding an option to the build system to pass extra parameters to SBCL? Then we could pass "--dynamic-space-size=3D5000" just for generic= -cl. Thoughts? Guillaume? =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl+qjUESHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x/zcMIAJiRRmoZeBV01iz7AmSjC5CsWuZBttRU EQGuQzd73jwSyfqT7IPyxDrP50vVhmUdZxQW1ym8p6ROk02onP+1Ka1mROygFbg6 r4u4rhjGGni2j9AKI8yspbz4soWT1EL27TgcvcJ9lo+c8u1IgCr1VCXKoCK+fV44 sbEVRq7rAFnUim66DhVtEzOJcOaXWuQaibZUey5BgZuZ1155TXBlFS4dE6Zj5TcY 58ncOyq/0XzBwsyl63inLHIcY2ek9L3XkGeGlTUtrJAEVoglnP5GfL8uka6s8dgf TWck48UnVaRhBzhunAOAXJWYlHXfURckm2WtCfE6PPvGTG8Vje/Sz3k= =PVw6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 10 09:02:51 2020 Received: (at 44552) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Nov 2020 14:02:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36830 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcUES-00017Y-3i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:02:51 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:51608) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcUEN-00014P-Pu for 44552@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:02:47 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51BD916005C for <44552@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 15:02:37 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1605016957; bh=CgAj0O5RJBk9u8Eu+LFVUj0RiR7cdNEXue7hyM9J0Fw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=iHnd9FQWfVo9AS4hkK8/9scgq7mM5qzahN+uRK8sBisglpYvO/fBV+mNi9CUP6u/9 n7wDJ4bSRYjj3/WfGyo8bJKPdkN3RuV+tyvUZjT0m+TvXHjx0Yr4VME0iRZObRt0JK O7vdAG75o6Bxa5zo6UJuGm2RD2tWwf0n2IOlvF3pgUcp7382AddbjJAy+0saD1+jyE SI0EbS2acKMTaVQLlDs05BWc0V94bi8RLGCR+vORroH3GzIasyGXy0yXRMT5LGlBFq S3DMT+Rh1Ot9vddxBbJTtUsComN0c6zv/FC5i+DIsvuy7EcVLrIrgu0fj8yQO71Wuz jmqAKB8QBudUQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4CVqLh141Kz9rxl; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 15:02:35 +0100 (CET) References: <87sg9hida6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl? In-reply-to: <87sg9hida6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 15:02:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87d00l1f9g.fsf@yamatai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44552 Cc: 44552@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > See https://github.com/alex-gutev/generic-cl/issues/6 > > The space size of our current SBCL package is 2Gb. > Shall we increase it to 5Gb? > > What about adding an option to the build system to pass extra parameters > to SBCL? Then we could pass "--dynamic-space-size=5000" just for generic-cl. > > Thoughts? Guillaume? I guess we could increase the default max space size to 4 or 5 GB without causing swapping issues on users' machines (at least on x86-64). And users wanting a smaller one can use the "dynamic-space-size" option at runtime. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCX6qdew8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j/0RAD9Fb+Y2xxnJnSI7Y/oHVPqBni94D5xU1aeGtsB r/rRuSoA/R5VekUbp2UxsD29OuV+qhv9LB34nSgeSq+nHgol7VCt =VBog -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 10 11:43:10 2020 Received: (at 44552) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Nov 2020 16:43:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38770 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcWje-0007nm-5s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:43:10 -0500 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:49597) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcWjc-0007n8-6V for 44552@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:43:09 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 90.92.160.122 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1094-122.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.160.122]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A04640008; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:42:58 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Subject: Re: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl? In-Reply-To: <87d00l1f9g.fsf@yamatai> References: <87sg9hida6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87d00l1f9g.fsf@yamatai> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:42:57 +0100 Message-ID: <875z6di2ni.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > I guess we could increase the default max space size to 4 or 5 GB > without causing swapping issues on users' machines (at least on x86-64). > And users wanting a smaller one can use the "dynamic-sp [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [217.70.183.194 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44552 Cc: 44552@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > I guess we could increase the default max space size to 4 or 5 GB > without causing swapping issues on users' machines (at least on x86-64). > And users wanting a smaller one can use the "dynamic-sp [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [217.70.183.194 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > I guess we could increase the default max space size to 4 or 5 GB > without causing swapping issues on users' machines (at least on x86-64). > And users wanting a smaller one can use the "dynamic-space-size" option > at runtime. Fine with me, let's do it now on staging then? =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl+qwxESHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x/zuoH/36d67ceFDTyxadSMoaUUyLk/JhWP8kQ 6F81yAkcSQJNrNdYLNfLICNroAZm7w+lDawoaAroAq3kvRsWnrHPZh5qjMb2aLhG R4FEVh4cF85IZnIRvtMhn98CGjsQ9gnGw+dJhbCw7VUdNCoi0XNk+lcziRTjqWXU l+PjbxTS1D35XvciHcCtMwi/h8mz8aQa4f8KnD1FCPwlPMpIy3iEnK32QTlVl90m 6tVle8RntMqGq8294ffmEMweyKkMvp1p5FksQJzuZ0WepQ4GAtezP4yIkgbQ4MoC uAJFsTbrDKTSRRW0kLT8VNVF/CLMuGF1OaZn7UqUb/3RNZtEOiRpUK4= =Saav -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 10 11:55:16 2020 Received: (at 44552) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Nov 2020 16:55:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38778 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcWvM-00085Q-JA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:55:16 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:48966) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcWvK-00085B-1t for 44552@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:55:15 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C18D6160062 for <44552@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:55:05 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1605027305; bh=YbQO3HE11/uQWXFktILgHsAlP4cI1tz5dutO+WYFQxA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=CCAZOdynonCCW8B1bEhX+ZEjFXeJimlzSNVQDGEPekgUqr7w/JYFYHddYonZ2vsEJ IfFo9MDqlM8JXjbvek7NtFqERfP7Wb8Yd6CSQ0A2bs+H9f24KRqKmGzTu+kdlJRmmp OzR0BaQ2ecphJBF/Q/74CZCjgOaVk3wjjfDFjJ8iUYzxLTAHr/oVPPnyPqzIcsB2eO VW2tYXQHqDrusLYtPI2zIU6JoV4k/uz2WqcMGz97h+6rvQfnWpumX/ikhvGdWIWkfS 025MP2ZrazMB3zEDG0mWEtFGWySMcniRVlHmdhIVpTRpjPISE8QmW8GxBPKlOPmYgp UueDGSM5DXMBQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4CVv9h5NT1z9rxM; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:55:04 +0100 (CET) References: <87sg9hida6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87d00l1f9g.fsf@yamatai> <875z6di2ni.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl? In-reply-to: <875z6di2ni.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:55:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87a6vp17a0.fsf@yamatai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44552 Cc: 44552@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > >> I guess we could increase the default max space size to 4 or 5 GB >> without causing swapping issues on users' machines (at least on x86-64). >> And users wanting a smaller one can use the "dynamic-space-size" option >> at runtime. > > Fine with me, let's do it now on staging then? Yes, go ahead. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCX6rF5w8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j/pWwD+IusCV0msiUQd6vdvzVI4/5iNgZfA5IMFpHQe /6BIY3EA/R0p043setz2KQqhUjh/zveXBd2jF7CtKRCiMB5eWbpP =ByAN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 10 14:57:44 2020 Received: (at 44552) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Nov 2020 19:57:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38973 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcZlw-0008W1-1q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 14:57:44 -0500 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:44149) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcZlt-0008Vn-UC for 44552@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 14:57:42 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 90.92.160.122 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1094-122.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.160.122]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 864851C0008; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:57:34 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Subject: Re: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl? In-Reply-To: <87a6vp17a0.fsf@yamatai> References: <87sg9hida6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87d00l1f9g.fsf@yamatai> <875z6di2ni.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87a6vp17a0.fsf@yamatai> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:57:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87lff9gf2q.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: It failed with "5Gb", it worked with "6000". I'm testing with "5000" since upstream said it worked for them. -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.70.183.197 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44552 Cc: 44552@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: It failed with "5Gb", it worked with "6000". I'm testing with "5000" since upstream said it worked for them. -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.70.183.197 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It failed with "5Gb", it worked with "6000". I'm testing with "5000" since upstream said it worked for them. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl+q8K0SHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x/t40H/3htnwjgVOtwMsVNZkco1DQ1FADGDcFp EEpo0WaOrysIl3X3nMadDtUOYH9nLfsqded0aCypwvgCHdMUt4bsuOK6f9L8YwHj Wo2qgxB0PVNjA2Hi/u6scO9vIaiMnqYbeR4803peOThPiXi7MAt7Jx95hCMCcJjP dc4hszAPNJWsVTM+hZd17UmjPpNe/HIFQ9wRrgH8ETRzLxYz3IG28Dz+H3NK9JWN 8+oiQS3plIyY5+kLLHtVdxzjKAlTgWWPhYvGyo/cALJ13W30glwlOl4e8O9iNSKi jBIf3ptU+sys+n5NqFXM8TyJP1RF4j8C1N2HlcNSyReFrAQJwG0LIIo= =IgtI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 10 15:59:32 2020 Received: (at 44552) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Nov 2020 20:59:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39107 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcajk-0005tk-AE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 15:59:32 -0500 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:48119) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcajh-0005tV-Tk for 44552@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 15:59:30 -0500 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1094-122.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.160.122]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay11.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB44F100002; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:59:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Subject: Re: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl? In-Reply-To: <87lff9gf2q.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <87sg9hida6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87d00l1f9g.fsf@yamatai> <875z6di2ni.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87a6vp17a0.fsf@yamatai> <87lff9gf2q.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:59:22 +0100 Message-ID: <87ft5hgc7p.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Pierre Neidhardt writes: > It failed with "5Gb", it worked with "6000". > I'm testing with "5000" since upstream said it worked for them. Nope, it does not :p Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.178.231 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.70.178.231 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44552 Cc: 44552@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Pierre Neidhardt writes: > It failed with "5Gb", it worked with "6000". > I'm testing with "5000" since upstream said it worked for them. Nope, it does not :p Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.70.178.231 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.178.231 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pierre Neidhardt writes: > It failed with "5Gb", it worked with "6000". > I'm testing with "5000" since upstream said it worked for them. Nope, it does not :p So which value should we set? It's not because 6000 passes on my machine that it will necessary pass on all the Guix build servers. I'm leaning towards disabling the tests for generic-cl. What do you think? =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl+q/yoSHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x/3fwH/0P3ErApwVBj2CWdnTRNisrmZNw/yzII yrWYQ3PzPCNxAm/bOZTSI3XJ/wFQLcOVxheLeNgKceLSeu7Q4KGQUi6As2ppOJlX KrHsGy9AzvcK9rUxqh/zgZb/KdBjHFXAFiVzwusIBdOR8bc29iT7iSGpAIs0+OOh YBpW7+ry799v8O1mqUdSzgcrOLhO1fs+8HmMFEvM4P8pCHojNd7yhSYwn7Ulfkz5 pPgICTgIm45edcoT46DLGAN4wJNOkVak94S+b3sXFbnyFuL+U51+bTuHCeP+TaPa T2MJZcW9CziXBzVOwZzS2K4Wrgf9mJCKPrGeNneaWtXfX0OBvx6CawE= =ffKo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 11 03:11:31 2020 Received: (at 44552) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2020 08:11:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40146 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kclE3-0001lM-42 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:11:31 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:39919) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kclE1-0001l4-30 for 44552@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:11:30 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FF232400FE for <44552@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:11:22 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1605082282; bh=iMk5qdm9unba+7uCYNaDmmBmusJag8dKQ3wr2s4SLyM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=QrjICVxC1THiFWbKqLREaEAhKfF/OUj6DxLF1XuWtZsEUHUkoWucQ16tqcoqK7zPC dKH+aXKMAnOQ+Ych2C2VoVykAJF2cvrnpxOHR1JCA1EVuKTr5rAYf9fhU6/B3tvpxP 0EsD7tpnhtO46dpPpyPbxWqAV/EdRGeOdnoo4gMrRsQ4j7YovhHwGGwCNjPnRAx5OG lijeQ31n1P8g9OZryuLbvJ/vuLlPSYtVuGDcfTmsZSyQXx/eQ5/Q726W3vX0p5ugwS ke+EpN2Z1FS+p3cjha4ydGypRcAHiu/0HmC3HJg3wmOjhyvituh7oWztHHjynveatl PHR2kf7+DfDPw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4CWHVw3mFwz6tmc; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:11:20 +0100 (CET) References: <87sg9hida6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87d00l1f9g.fsf@yamatai> <875z6di2ni.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87a6vp17a0.fsf@yamatai> <87lff9gf2q.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87ft5hgc7p.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl? In-reply-to: <87ft5hgc7p.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:11:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87h7pwtisg.fsf@yamatai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44552 Cc: 44552@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > Pierre Neidhardt writes: > >> It failed with "5Gb", it worked with "6000". >> I'm testing with "5000" since upstream said it worked for them. > > Nope, it does not :p > > So which value should we set? It's not because 6000 passes on my > machine that it will necessary pass on all the Guix build servers. > > I'm leaning towards disabling the tests for generic-cl. What do you think? If the tests don't run reliably, disabling them sounds like a good idea. IIRC the tests of sbcl-numcl are disabled because of a similar problem. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCX6ucnw8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j87ZwEAo6yUAtJUEWQz0Ad23pCkUuYHa/nHpbAAYmsl 6864fdMA/i20/rg3f/leKxLgCnR+XbCXFAEN6nr7nwUtlwZR2Ztd =et6y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 11 04:12:57 2020 Received: (at 44552) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2020 09:12:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40191 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcmBV-0003Io-NJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:12:57 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:45129) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcmBU-0003Ib-Av for 44552@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:12:57 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 90.92.160.122 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1094-122.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.160.122]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 868A9E0002; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:12:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Subject: Re: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl? In-Reply-To: <87h7pwtisg.fsf@yamatai> References: <87sg9hida6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87d00l1f9g.fsf@yamatai> <875z6di2ni.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87a6vp17a0.fsf@yamatai> <87lff9gf2q.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87ft5hgc7p.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87h7pwtisg.fsf@yamatai> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:12:48 +0100 Message-ID: <874klwgstr.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: OK, will do when I merge generic-cl! -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [217.70.183.196 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44552 Cc: 44552@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: OK, will do when I merge generic-cl! -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [217.70.183.196 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable OK, will do when I merge generic-cl! =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl+rqxASHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x/huEH/2IiG4QyDq4Y7dbPQ30Ki/021YM7brTT MZgu1Ibhc5E8ngtxZwneA+XWrTecUgQ24ucT3KCt+uKRE/QGOZ8E48Yzqi+QZsQS cXHj+ehdndXxhl9/K8iMcpT7vyVetVeBG25zbBS69RlNIdYKuliQ1ZmcJ56BAhPF DiTdWL5Phs7tLTrauP3nNe/HmKvGjkBJUcvS1d6+WC481pbBpy/zh3/JfP1KvysZ 0ZQbgpSMxhROfISqCJW6XdR1cY1aQFSfXYwBBkLth3erzh2uVpbt/NpmgGD0mcFF 92SayBrWqxLifWP4Rq4Y+l/QNe5Xp2T+BdJghdJnrXjmKJ02FK8T8uI= =Z6pA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 11 04:15:09 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2020 09:15:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40197 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcmDd-0003Mz-4Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:15:09 -0500 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:40871) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcmDb-0003MM-KO for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:15:08 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 90.92.160.122 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1094-122.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.160.122]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2887C20009 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:15:00 +0100 Message-Id: <87361ggsq3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: control message for bug #44552 X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 44552 quit Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.70.183.200 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 2.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) close 44552 quit From unknown Sun Aug 10 09:46:12 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator