GNU bug report logs - #44552
Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl?

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>

Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:54:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 44552 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 44552 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#44552; Package guix. (Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:54:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:54:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Cc: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Subject: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl?
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 13:53:21 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
See https://github.com/alex-gutev/generic-cl/issues/6

The space size of our current SBCL package is 2Gb.
Shall we increase it to 5Gb?

What about adding an option to the build system to pass extra parameters
to SBCL?  Then we could pass "--dynamic-space-size=5000" just for generic-cl.

Thoughts?  Guillaume?

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#44552; Package guix. (Tue, 10 Nov 2020 14:03:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 44552 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 44552 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl?
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 15:02:35 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> skribis:

> See https://github.com/alex-gutev/generic-cl/issues/6
>
> The space size of our current SBCL package is 2Gb.
> Shall we increase it to 5Gb?
>
> What about adding an option to the build system to pass extra parameters
> to SBCL?  Then we could pass "--dynamic-space-size=5000" just for generic-cl.
>
> Thoughts?  Guillaume?

I guess we could increase the default max space size to 4 or 5 GB
without causing swapping issues on users' machines (at least on x86-64).
And users wanting a smaller one can use the "dynamic-space-size" option
at runtime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#44552; Package guix. (Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:44:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 44552 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 44552 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl?
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:42:57 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> writes:

> I guess we could increase the default max space size to 4 or 5 GB
> without causing swapping issues on users' machines (at least on x86-64).
> And users wanting a smaller one can use the "dynamic-space-size" option
> at runtime.

Fine with me, let's do it now on staging then?

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#44552; Package guix. (Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:56:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 44552 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 44552 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl?
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:55:03 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> skribis:

> Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> writes:
>
>> I guess we could increase the default max space size to 4 or 5 GB
>> without causing swapping issues on users' machines (at least on x86-64).
>> And users wanting a smaller one can use the "dynamic-space-size" option
>> at runtime.
>
> Fine with me, let's do it now on staging then?

Yes, go ahead.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#44552; Package guix. (Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:58:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 44552 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 44552 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl?
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:57:33 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
It failed with "5Gb", it worked with "6000".
I'm testing with "5000" since upstream said it worked for them.

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#44552; Package guix. (Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:00:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at 44552 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 44552 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl?
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:59:22 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> writes:

> It failed with "5Gb", it worked with "6000".
> I'm testing with "5000" since upstream said it worked for them.

Nope, it does not :p

So which value should we set?  It's not because 6000 passes on my
machine that it will necessary pass on all the Guix build servers.

I'm leaning towards disabling the tests for generic-cl.  What do you think?

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#44552; Package guix. (Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:12:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #23 received at 44552 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 44552 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl?
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:11:11 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> skribis:

> Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> writes:
>
>> It failed with "5Gb", it worked with "6000".
>> I'm testing with "5000" since upstream said it worked for them.
>
> Nope, it does not :p
>
> So which value should we set?  It's not because 6000 passes on my
> machine that it will necessary pass on all the Guix build servers.
>
> I'm leaning towards disabling the tests for generic-cl.  What do you think?

If the tests don't run reliably, disabling them sounds like a good idea.
IIRC the tests of sbcl-numcl are disabled because of a similar problem.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#44552; Package guix. (Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:13:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #26 received at 44552 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 44552 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl?
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:12:48 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
OK, will do when I merge generic-cl!

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

bug closed, send any further explanations to 44552 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> Request was from Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:16:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:24:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 4 years and 244 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.