GNU bug report logs - #44549
[PATCH] etc: updates for the guix-daemon SELinux policy

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Daniel Brooks <db48x <at> db48x.net>

Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:43:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Daniel Brooks <db48x <at> db48x.net>
To: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 44549 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#44549] [PATCH] etc: updates for the guix-daemon SELinux policy
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 07:34:04 -0800
Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Interestingly, after updating the system (both RHEL8 and Guix) and
> rebooting, I got new SELinux troubles!
>
> I had to add these additional rules to make guix-daemon start again:
>
> diff --git a/etc/guix-daemon.cil.in b/etc/guix-daemon.cil.in
> index 47fd12a214..3e254a2187 100644
> --- a/etc/guix-daemon.cil.in
> +++ b/etc/guix-daemon.cil.in
> @@ -86,12 +86,15 @@
>    (allow init_t
>           guix_daemon_t
>           (process (transition)))
> +  (allow init_t
> +         self
> +         (process (execmem)))

At some point we should track down why that one is necessary, perhaps
Guile has a JIT compiler or something?

>    (allow init_t
>           guix_store_content_t
> -         (file (open read execute)))
> +         (file (open read execute execute_no_trans map)))

This one looks pretty suspicious. I think it would allow any file
labeled guix_store_content_t to run in the init_t domain? We wouldn't
want that.

db48x




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 247 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.