GNU bug report logs - #44520
Graphical installer issues on 1.2.0.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#44520: closed (Graphical installer issues on 1.2.0.)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 13:54:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Tue, 10 Nov 2020 14:53:49 +0100
with message-id <87pn4ll3ma.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#44520: Graphical installer issues on 1.2.0.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #44520,
regarding Graphical installer issues on 1.2.0.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
44520: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=44520
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Graphical installer issues on 1.2.0.
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 16:29:53 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,

I tried the 1.2.0 graphical installer at ae0fe28, installing Guix System
from a usb drive to another one.

I had three issues:

* The auto partitioning crashed, backtrace as attachment.

* Using manual partitioning as a work-around, I started the installation
and observed that the installer downloaded "python" sources and then
substitutes for the whole bootstrapping chain (also as attachment).

* The substitutes download speed was sometimes super low (~ 50Kb/s).

An unpleasant sunday afternoon testing :(.

Mathieu

[backtrace.jpg (image/jpeg, attachment)]

[config.jpg (image/jpeg, attachment)]

[bootstrap.jpg (image/jpeg, attachment)]

[Message part 7 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 44520-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#44520: Graphical installer issues on 1.2.0.
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 14:53:49 +0100

Hello,

I tried again on commit 86e9e5c using an image built by the CI and an
image built locally. I was not able to reproduce any of the issues I had
initially.

Closing this one until we find a reproducible way to trigger those
issues.

Thanks,

Mathieu

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.