GNU bug report logs - #44503
27.1; image-scroll-up and image-scroll-down

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Roland Winkler" <winkler <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 15:17:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 27.1

Fixed in version 29.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #29 received at 44503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 44503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, winkler <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#44503: 27.1; image-scroll-up and image-scroll-down
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:52:45 +0200
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> Well, the doc strings for these commands don't really describe
>>> interactive usage at all, but I think most people would interpret what's
>>> there as "it's like (interactive "p"), but with no prefix at all it
>>> behaves differently".  (Which is what it does -- a full screen instead
>>> of a line.)
>>
>> What about the value of '-' ?
>
> Yes, `C-u -' here does the opposite of the non-prefixed action.  (While
> it's indistinguishable from `C-u - 1' with normal "p" action.)

Just a thought -- should we perhaps establish a convention for this that
we can say commands adhere to?  That is, `C-u NUM' means "the same as
'p'" while `C-u -' and no prefix means "some large (negative and
positive; depending on the command) amount"?  I'm not sure how many of
these commands we have...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 19 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.