GNU bug report logs - #44466
27.1; quail input fails at read-only boundary

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: lg.zevlg <at> gmail.com
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: dick.r.chiang <at> gmail.com, 44466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#44466: 27.1; quail input fails at read-only boundary
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2020 23:50:54 +0400

> 8 нояб. 2020 г., в 20:18, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> написал(а):
> 
> 
>> 
>> From: lg.zevlg <at> gmail.com
>> Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2020 20:07:46 +0400
>> Cc: dick.r.chiang <at> gmail.com, 44466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> 
>>> Any reason why pressing a key on a button should disregard the active
>>> input method?  What if the button needs the user to type the character
>>> which the input method would produce?  AFAIU, the patch we installed a
>>> year ago makes this impossible.
>> 
>> The reason is the same as for read-only buffers, making single char bindings work. For example if you change input method in image-mode and press “q” key this will kill buffer, because correct command is executed.
> 
> If this is a feature, it should be documented somewhere.  Is it?

I guess so, this feature was in Emacs for years. Usually people marks whole buffer as read-only and then mark special places to inhibit read-only, so quail translation inhibits for read-only parts and does the translation in writable parts. In telega.el project we do opposit - insert read-only parts in writable buffer and expect quail translation not to apply in that read-only parts of the buffer. We might change this behaviour, so patch to quail could be reverted, however I think it is better to fix this in quail, to reflect the logic in internal checks for region writability

—
lg

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.