From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 04 13:47:38 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2020 18:47:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50588 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kaNoo-00041e-6w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 13:47:38 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56568) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kaNol-00041W-BH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 13:47:37 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53622) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaNol-0001XQ-05 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 13:47:35 -0500 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:59261) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaNoi-0002tA-Mi for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 13:47:34 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 86.199.135.58 Received: from pc19.home (apoitiers-652-1-495-58.w86-199.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.199.135.58]) (Authenticated sender: d@divoplade.fr) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA6FC20006 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 18:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest From: divoplade To: bug-guix@gnu.org Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 19:47:22 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.200; envelope-from=d@divoplade.fr; helo=relay7-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/04 13:47:28 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Dear guix, I cannot add the "guile-3.0" package in any system configuration (the part that reads (packages (append (list ... %base-packages)))). When I do that, I get: $ LANG=C guix system docker-image config.scm guix system: error: profile contains conflicting entries for guile guix system: error: first entry: guile@3.0.2 /gnu/store/18hp7flyb3yid3yp49i6qcdq0sbi5l1n-guile-3.0.2 guix system: error: second entry: guile@3.0.4 /gnu/store/ah16zr8mmfkqy23rr7jy5a842ca1q9h1-guile-3.0.4 hint: You cannot have two different versions or variants of `guile' in the same profile. The fix would be to deprecate guile-3.0-latest as an alias for guile- 3.0, and use the 3.0.4 version in guile-3.0. Best regards, divoplade From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 04 15:15:29 2020 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2020 20:15:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50700 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kaPBp-0006DU-DO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 15:15:29 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com ([209.85.221.42]:43306) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kaPBn-0006DG-Si for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 15:15:28 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id g12so23391307wrp.10 for <44452@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 12:15:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qt8O1jNKlCG755WjBmHaq2ETeUxPUNUS4nfR82dWyzo=; b=bTrWk2QpOi8EbCa33lr5l0EqIxLMmKvNzbjILhrBrp0GpDk8hqbU57sIQDfNJfnuA8 IzmnQzEd5N84TDst7GC9k6QeS/P76Q0Duw2AyvFCciAtwOm0wRzC2YeGzFIycO+2JQMG 6idXRb44nbfAuLJPzThx9TxO4F1Nc81RhnP1oABhgKCrU5Z8XQa11d89FzEI7fi/FOk8 /Jk0oYnclJ2Yg9pLBxUn3SmsY/bo3WuCOgoEf6zAzTW29mZo5xaIqtnzVyGnNmlyFnjY L0vM0PTOOUQrKlq5wfWPE0X8y9ViqtdfCpbKjOPrX3Xklj4UcoamdOqcfZZzU4gdMW0R gLAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qt8O1jNKlCG755WjBmHaq2ETeUxPUNUS4nfR82dWyzo=; b=j2kVHCuaqzNcJq/2TKifKPXO/CJD75CsRL7vhf32F1o49CtMxMhzpBR7awMUO62PPs IA2ViRXjEwIVZDlE8l3gpQ+zuYadu0m1/92h+OSuGnxGIiaPoOLN3/PzRtzuNYODW4X5 fbwUzTaaEhAClMUvsLrTVcX6mB9g3louM9ZID946yOba3k5dtkhpbjulr9vx4m5F/RBR DfH7nA6FNAYDOe1hggf+Sfqlj+gmGLSRWRUCDisX+vAD3NEtIbgyNDZNucMwGkVxC+87 x6PLLqzidwKHAN5Mw8beR8mfiwSqgx+Z3OJZpyyDC6sVbJ9h2Bm9XMhe7S3vN026t6P8 Q3qQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533PQ0NTrzOyL2TgpEKh4R8KLGNeGzuTcjVqDBAlYZ6sey9DwnQx uygDdT6GgoTTJUQMSqmMTaX7UPtXXHg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxY6FyctdO4NDGfwjg7f2ciPcSjiTVxHyb6IWFoMNwtOfJ7BKvua3oOrJISvMpXnGdTj77Kag== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:490c:: with SMTP id x12mr33749374wrq.193.1604520921656; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 12:15:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u195sm3783915wmu.18.2020.11.04.12.15.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 04 Nov 2020 12:15:21 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: divoplade , 44452@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 21:15:19 +0100 Message-ID: <86r1p8g9pk.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44452 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Dear, On Wed, 04 Nov 2020 at 19:47, divoplade wrote: > $ LANG=3DC guix system docker-image config.scm=20 > guix system: error: profile contains conflicting entries for guile > guix system: error: first entry: guile@3.0.2 > /gnu/store/18hp7flyb3yid3yp49i6qcdq0sbi5l1n-guile-3.0.2 > guix system: error: second entry: guile@3.0.4 > /gnu/store/ah16zr8mmfkqy23rr7jy5a842ca1q9h1-guile-3.0.4 > hint: You cannot have two different versions or variants of `guile' in > the same profile. Which packages =E2=80=99config.scm=E2=80=99 contain? Other said, what does= the conflict make happen? I do not know if an option =E2=80=99--allow-collisions=E2=80=99 makes sense= here. > The fix would be to deprecate guile-3.0-latest as an alias for guile- > 3.0, and use the 3.0.4 version in guile-3.0. I have not checked, but this proposal could lead to a world rebuild. All the best, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 05 02:02:39 2020 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2020 07:02:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51480 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kaZI7-0005jG-Ds for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 02:02:39 -0500 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:42037) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kaZI4-0005j1-Nf for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 02:02:38 -0500 Received: from pc19.home (apoitiers-652-1-495-58.w86-199.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.199.135.58]) (Authenticated sender: d@divoplade.fr) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 707EB240009; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 07:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <93f08f3d9cbfd9d98b89d68f2fe0d7a0a3e2023c.camel@divoplade.fr> Subject: Re: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest From: divoplade To: zimoun , 44452@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 08:02:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86r1p8g9pk.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86r1p8g9pk.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-wSlr1lRW9a/OjfISDYA2" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44452 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-wSlr1lRW9a/OjfISDYA2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello Simon, Le mercredi 04 novembre 2020 à 21:15 +0100, zimoun a écrit : > Which packages ’config.scm’ contain? Other said, what does the > conflict > make happen? You can try with one of the examples of guix, if you don't want to risk anything with your config! Here is lightweight-desktop.tmpl, and the edited lightweight-desktop-with-guile.tmpl. If you run guix system docker-image lightweight-desktop-with-guile.tmpl you get the error. If you run guix system docker-image lightweight-desktop.tmpl it works. Also, I must say that the problem also happens with any package that has guile has a propagated input, but the root of the problem seems to be guile. --=-wSlr1lRW9a/OjfISDYA2 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="lightweight-desktop-with-guile.tmpl" Content-Type: text/plain; name="lightweight-desktop-with-guile.tmpl"; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 OzsgVGhpcyBpcyBhbiBvcGVyYXRpbmcgc3lzdGVtIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24gdGVtcGxhdGUKOzsg Zm9yIGEgImRlc2t0b3AiIHNldHVwIHdpdGhvdXQgZnVsbC1ibG93biBkZXNrdG9wCjs7IGVudmly b25tZW50cy4KCih1c2UtbW9kdWxlcyAoZ251KSAoZ251IHN5c3RlbSBuc3MpIChnbnUgcGFja2Fn ZXMgZ3VpbGUpKQoodXNlLXNlcnZpY2UtbW9kdWxlcyBkZXNrdG9wKQoodXNlLXBhY2thZ2UtbW9k dWxlcyBib290bG9hZGVycyBjZXJ0cyBlbWFjcyBlbWFjcy14eXogcmF0cG9pc29uIHN1Y2tsZXNz IHdtCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHhvcmcpCgoob3BlcmF0aW5nLXN5c3RlbQogIChob3N0 LW5hbWUgImFudGVsb3BlIikKICAodGltZXpvbmUgIkV1cm9wZS9QYXJpcyIpCiAgKGxvY2FsZSAi ZW5fVVMudXRmOCIpCgogIDs7IFVzZSB0aGUgVUVGSSB2YXJpYW50IG9mIEdSVUIgd2l0aCB0aGUg RUZJIFN5c3RlbQogIDs7IFBhcnRpdGlvbiBtb3VudGVkIG9uIC9ib290L2VmaS4KICAoYm9vdGxv YWRlciAoYm9vdGxvYWRlci1jb25maWd1cmF0aW9uCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAoYm9vdGxvYWRl ciBncnViLWVmaS1ib290bG9hZGVyKQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKHRhcmdldCAiL2Jvb3QvZWZp IikpKQoKICA7OyBBc3N1bWUgdGhlIHRhcmdldCByb290IGZpbGUgc3lzdGVtIGlzIGxhYmVsbGVk ICJteS1yb290IiwKICA7OyBhbmQgdGhlIEVGSSBTeXN0ZW0gUGFydGl0aW9uIGhhcyBVVUlEIDEy MzQtQUJDRC4KICAoZmlsZS1zeXN0ZW1zIChhcHBlbmQKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAobGlzdCAo ZmlsZS1zeXN0ZW0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIChkZXZpY2UgKGZpbGUtc3lzdGVt LWxhYmVsICJteS1yb290IikpCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAobW91bnQtcG9pbnQg Ii8iKQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKHR5cGUgImV4dDQiKSkKICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAoZmlsZS1zeXN0ZW0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIChkZXZpY2Ug KHV1aWQgIjEyMzQtQUJDRCIgJ2ZhdCkpCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAobW91bnQt cG9pbnQgIi9ib290L2VmaSIpCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAodHlwZSAidmZhdCIp KSkKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAlYmFzZS1maWxlLXN5c3RlbXMpKQoKICAodXNlcnMgKGNvbnMg KHVzZXItYWNjb3VudAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKG5hbWUgImFsaWNlIikKICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgIChjb21tZW50ICJCb2IncyBzaXN0ZXIiKQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKGdyb3VwICJ1c2Vy cyIpCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAoc3VwcGxlbWVudGFyeS1ncm91cHMgJygid2hlZWwiICJuZXRk ZXYiCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAiYXVkaW8iICJ2aWRl byIpKSkKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgJWJhc2UtdXNlci1hY2NvdW50cykpCgogIDs7IEFkZCBhIGJ1 bmNoIG9mIHdpbmRvdyBtYW5hZ2Vyczsgd2UgY2FuIGNob29zZSBvbmUgYXQKICA7OyB0aGUgbG9n LWluIHNjcmVlbiB3aXRoIEYxLgogIChwYWNrYWdlcyAoYXBwZW5kIChsaXN0CiAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgIDs7IHdpbmRvdyBtYW5hZ2VycwogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICByYXRwb2lz b24gaTMtd20gaTNzdGF0dXMgZG1lbnUKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgZW1hY3MgZW1hY3Mt ZXh3bSBlbWFjcy1kZXNrdG9wLWVudmlyb25tZW50CiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIDs7IHRl cm1pbmFsIGVtdWxhdG9yCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHh0ZXJtCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgIDs7IGZvciBIVFRQUyBhY2Nlc3MKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgbnNzLWNlcnRz CgkJICAgICA7OyBCb28hCgkJICAgICBndWlsZS0zLjApCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgJWJh c2UtcGFja2FnZXMpKQoKICA7OyBVc2UgdGhlICJkZXNrdG9wIiBzZXJ2aWNlcywgd2hpY2ggaW5j bHVkZSB0aGUgWDExCiAgOzsgbG9nLWluIHNlcnZpY2UsIG5ldHdvcmtpbmcgd2l0aCBOZXR3b3Jr TWFuYWdlciwgYW5kIG1vcmUuCiAgKHNlcnZpY2VzICVkZXNrdG9wLXNlcnZpY2VzKQoKICA7OyBB bGxvdyByZXNvbHV0aW9uIG9mICcubG9jYWwnIGhvc3QgbmFtZXMgd2l0aCBtRE5TLgogIChuYW1l LXNlcnZpY2Utc3dpdGNoICVtZG5zLWhvc3QtbG9va3VwLW5zcykpCg== --=-wSlr1lRW9a/OjfISDYA2 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="lightweight-desktop.tmpl" Content-Type: text/plain; name="lightweight-desktop.tmpl"; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 OzsgVGhpcyBpcyBhbiBvcGVyYXRpbmcgc3lzdGVtIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24gdGVtcGxhdGUKOzsg Zm9yIGEgImRlc2t0b3AiIHNldHVwIHdpdGhvdXQgZnVsbC1ibG93biBkZXNrdG9wCjs7IGVudmly b25tZW50cy4KCih1c2UtbW9kdWxlcyAoZ251KSAoZ251IHN5c3RlbSBuc3MpKQoodXNlLXNlcnZp Y2UtbW9kdWxlcyBkZXNrdG9wKQoodXNlLXBhY2thZ2UtbW9kdWxlcyBib290bG9hZGVycyBjZXJ0 cyBlbWFjcyBlbWFjcy14eXogcmF0cG9pc29uIHN1Y2tsZXNzIHdtCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgIHhvcmcpCgoob3BlcmF0aW5nLXN5c3RlbQogIChob3N0LW5hbWUgImFudGVsb3BlIikKICAo dGltZXpvbmUgIkV1cm9wZS9QYXJpcyIpCiAgKGxvY2FsZSAiZW5fVVMudXRmOCIpCgogIDs7IFVz ZSB0aGUgVUVGSSB2YXJpYW50IG9mIEdSVUIgd2l0aCB0aGUgRUZJIFN5c3RlbQogIDs7IFBhcnRp dGlvbiBtb3VudGVkIG9uIC9ib290L2VmaS4KICAoYm9vdGxvYWRlciAoYm9vdGxvYWRlci1jb25m aWd1cmF0aW9uCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAoYm9vdGxvYWRlciBncnViLWVmaS1ib290bG9hZGVy KQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKHRhcmdldCAiL2Jvb3QvZWZpIikpKQoKICA7OyBBc3N1bWUgdGhl IHRhcmdldCByb290IGZpbGUgc3lzdGVtIGlzIGxhYmVsbGVkICJteS1yb290IiwKICA7OyBhbmQg dGhlIEVGSSBTeXN0ZW0gUGFydGl0aW9uIGhhcyBVVUlEIDEyMzQtQUJDRC4KICAoZmlsZS1zeXN0 ZW1zIChhcHBlbmQKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAobGlzdCAoZmlsZS1zeXN0ZW0KICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIChkZXZpY2UgKGZpbGUtc3lzdGVtLWxhYmVsICJteS1yb290IikpCiAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAobW91bnQtcG9pbnQgIi8iKQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgKHR5cGUgImV4dDQiKSkKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAoZmlsZS1zeXN0 ZW0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIChkZXZpY2UgKHV1aWQgIjEyMzQtQUJDRCIgJ2Zh dCkpCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAobW91bnQtcG9pbnQgIi9ib290L2VmaSIpCiAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAodHlwZSAidmZhdCIpKSkKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAl YmFzZS1maWxlLXN5c3RlbXMpKQoKICAodXNlcnMgKGNvbnMgKHVzZXItYWNjb3VudAogICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgKG5hbWUgImFsaWNlIikKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIChjb21tZW50ICJCb2IncyBz aXN0ZXIiKQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKGdyb3VwICJ1c2VycyIpCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAo c3VwcGxlbWVudGFyeS1ncm91cHMgJygid2hlZWwiICJuZXRkZXYiCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAiYXVkaW8iICJ2aWRlbyIpKSkKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg JWJhc2UtdXNlci1hY2NvdW50cykpCgogIDs7IEFkZCBhIGJ1bmNoIG9mIHdpbmRvdyBtYW5hZ2Vy czsgd2UgY2FuIGNob29zZSBvbmUgYXQKICA7OyB0aGUgbG9nLWluIHNjcmVlbiB3aXRoIEYxLgog IChwYWNrYWdlcyAoYXBwZW5kIChsaXN0CiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIDs7IHdpbmRvdyBt YW5hZ2VycwogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICByYXRwb2lzb24gaTMtd20gaTNzdGF0dXMgZG1l bnUKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgZW1hY3MgZW1hY3MtZXh3bSBlbWFjcy1kZXNrdG9wLWVu dmlyb25tZW50CiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIDs7IHRlcm1pbmFsIGVtdWxhdG9yCiAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHh0ZXJtCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIDs7IGZvciBIVFRQUyBh Y2Nlc3MKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgbnNzLWNlcnRzKQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICViYXNlLXBhY2thZ2VzKSkKCiAgOzsgVXNlIHRoZSAiZGVza3RvcCIgc2VydmljZXMsIHdoaWNo IGluY2x1ZGUgdGhlIFgxMQogIDs7IGxvZy1pbiBzZXJ2aWNlLCBuZXR3b3JraW5nIHdpdGggTmV0 d29ya01hbmFnZXIsIGFuZCBtb3JlLgogIChzZXJ2aWNlcyAlZGVza3RvcC1zZXJ2aWNlcykKCiAg OzsgQWxsb3cgcmVzb2x1dGlvbiBvZiAnLmxvY2FsJyBob3N0IG5hbWVzIHdpdGggbUROUy4KICAo bmFtZS1zZXJ2aWNlLXN3aXRjaCAlbWRucy1ob3N0LWxvb2t1cC1uc3MpKQo= --=-wSlr1lRW9a/OjfISDYA2-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 05 02:40:15 2020 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2020 07:40:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51540 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kaZsU-0000Le-KX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 02:40:14 -0500 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:44125) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kaZsQ-0000LG-IA for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 02:40:12 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 86.199.135.58 Received: from pc19.home (apoitiers-652-1-495-58.w86-199.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.199.135.58]) (Authenticated sender: d@divoplade.fr) by relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7195AFF80C; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 07:40:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest From: divoplade To: zimoun , 44452@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 08:39:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86r1p8g9pk.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86r1p8g9pk.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-camF7JvdxRZflb4TkOx8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44452 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-camF7JvdxRZflb4TkOx8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Le mercredi 04 novembre 2020 à 21:15 +0100, zimoun a écrit : > > The fix would be to deprecate guile-3.0-latest as an alias for > > guile- > > 3.0, and use the 3.0.4 version in guile-3.0. > > I have not checked, but this proposal could lead to a world rebuild. With this fix, yes, it leads to a world rebuild, but it was marked in a TODO anyway. I don't know if it fully solves the problem just yet, because I'm downloading 400MB of world rebuilding with my connection at 180 KB/s, but I have good hopes! Best regards, divoplade --=-camF7JvdxRZflb4TkOx8 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-gnu-upgrade-guile-to-3.0.4.patch" Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="0001-gnu-upgrade-guile-to-3.0.4.patch"; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 RnJvbSA0MmUyZDY0NTMzYzAxOGE2MWRiODQwOGI1YWUyMjMxMmIyMTBmN2NjIE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBkaXZvcGxhZGUgPGRAZGl2b3BsYWRlLmZyPgpEYXRlOiBUaHUs IDUgTm92IDIwMjAgMDg6MjU6NDYgKzAxMDAKU3ViamVjdDogW1BBVENIXSBnbnU6IHVwZ3JhZGUg Z3VpbGUgdG8gMy4wLjQKCkl0IGlzIGltcG9zc2libGUgdG8gaGF2ZSBndWlsZS0zLjAgaW5zdGFs bGVkIGFzIGEgcGFja2FnZSBpbiB0aGUgc3lzdGVtCmNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24sIGJlY2F1c2UgaXQg aXMgaW5jb21wYXRpYmxlIHdpdGggZ3VpbGUtMy4wLWxhdGVzdCB3aGljaCBpcyB1c2VkCmJ5IHRo ZSBzeXN0ZW0gKHNlZSBidWcgNDQ0NTIpLiBCeSBoYXZpbmcgdGhlIHNhbWUgdmVyc2lvbiwgaXQg d29ya3MuCi0tLQogZ251L3BhY2thZ2VzL2d1aWxlLnNjbSB8IDE2ICsrKy0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0K IDEgZmlsZSBjaGFuZ2VkLCAzIGluc2VydGlvbnMoKyksIDEzIGRlbGV0aW9ucygtKQoKZGlmZiAt LWdpdCBhL2dudS9wYWNrYWdlcy9ndWlsZS5zY20gYi9nbnUvcGFja2FnZXMvZ3VpbGUuc2NtCmlu ZGV4IDZkOTNkNzQzMmYuLmZmOTQzZGQ2ZGUgMTAwNjQ0Ci0tLSBhL2dudS9wYWNrYWdlcy9ndWls ZS5zY20KKysrIGIvZ251L3BhY2thZ2VzL2d1aWxlLnNjbQpAQCAtMjg0LDE0ICsyODQsMTQgQEAg d2l0aG91dCByZXF1aXJpbmcgdGhlIHNvdXJjZSBjb2RlIHRvIGJlIHJld3JpdHRlbi4iKQogICAo cGFja2FnZQogICAgIChpbmhlcml0IGd1aWxlLTIuMikKICAgICAobmFtZSAiZ3VpbGUiKQotICAg ICh2ZXJzaW9uICIzLjAuMiIpCisgICAgKHZlcnNpb24gIjMuMC40IikKICAgICAoc291cmNlIChv cmlnaW4KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKGluaGVyaXQgKHBhY2thZ2Utc291cmNlIGd1aWxlLTIuMikp CiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICh1cmkgKHN0cmluZy1hcHBlbmQgIm1pcnJvcjovL2dudS9ndWlsZS9n dWlsZS0iCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgdmVyc2lvbiAiLnRhci54 eiIpKQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAoc2hhMjU2CiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAoYmFzZTMyCi0gICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgIjEybHppYXI0ajI3ajl3aHFwMm4xODQyN3E0NXk5Z2hxN2dkZDhscWhtajFr MGxyN3ZpMmsiKSkpKQorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICIwYzhka3l2czZ4YnhwN3JnbmhreWFrYWp6 aGFrYXk3cW45a2FoajFtajQ5eDV2ZjRmeWJiIikpKSkKICAgICAoYXJndW1lbnRzCiAgICAgIDs7 IFhYWDogSklULWVuYWJsZWQgR3VpbGUgY3Jhc2hlcyBpbiBvYnNjdXJlIHdheXMgb24gR05VL0h1 cmQuCiAgICAgIChpZiAoaHVyZC10YXJnZXQ/KQpAQCAtMzA5LDE3ICszMDksNyBAQCB3aXRob3V0 IHJlcXVpcmluZyB0aGUgc291cmNlIGNvZGUgdG8gYmUgcmV3cml0dGVuLiIpCiAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAic2hhcmUvZ3VpbGUvc2l0ZS8zLjAiKSkpKSkpKQogCiAoZGVmaW5lLXB1Ymxp YyBndWlsZS0zLjAtbGF0ZXN0Ci0gIDs7IFRPRE86IE1ha2UgdGhpcyAnZ3VpbGUtMy4wJyBvbiB0 aGUgbmV4dCByZWJ1aWxkIGN5Y2xlLgotICAocGFja2FnZQotICAgIChpbmhlcml0IGd1aWxlLTMu MCkKLSAgICAodmVyc2lvbiAiMy4wLjQiKQotICAgIChzb3VyY2UgKG9yaWdpbgotICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAoaW5oZXJpdCAocGFja2FnZS1zb3VyY2UgZ3VpbGUtMy4wKSkKLSAgICAgICAgICAgICAg KHVyaSAoc3RyaW5nLWFwcGVuZCAibWlycm9yOi8vZ251L2d1aWxlL2d1aWxlLSIKLSAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB2ZXJzaW9uICIudGFyLnh6IikpCi0gICAgICAgICAg ICAgIChzaGEyNTYKLSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIChiYXNlMzIKLSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAiMGM4 ZGt5dnM2eGJ4cDdyZ25oa3lha2Fqemhha2F5N3FuOWthaGoxbWo0OXg1dmY0ZnliYiIpKSkpKSkK KyAgKGRlcHJlY2F0ZWQtcGFja2FnZSAiZ3VpbGUtMy4wLWxhdGVzdCIgZ3VpbGUtMy4wKSkKIAog KGRlZmluZS1wdWJsaWMgZ3VpbGUtbmV4dAogICAoZGVwcmVjYXRlZC1wYWNrYWdlICJndWlsZS1u ZXh0IiBndWlsZS0zLjApKQotLSAKMi4yOS4yCgo= --=-camF7JvdxRZflb4TkOx8-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 05 05:29:28 2020 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2020 10:29:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51771 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kacWG-0006bQ-Ju for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 05:29:28 -0500 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:40311) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kacWD-0006bG-4V for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 05:29:26 -0500 Received: from nijino.local (217-149-162-161.nat.highway.telekom.at [217.149.162.161]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CRfrx5MHgz1LWny; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:29:21 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4CRfrx5MHgz1LWny DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1604572161; bh=XlUBeAYADanTi8XdWJFQtDNgDxnYF88uj1hzCiG/nb8=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=GgmvnOMc9L4XOGSA0DtcvZSbUc8sGGtTJI5nB7gvwjTQeJf6thTjD5YWLh4+r2DOR aXRCog5GCQuhdsZz6UtLuft2tyl4C5qVnSoNq9ljwrXexE4X+XqH3kXmUR2uXEJUdr z77d//Ceox4wAvFpQQ080Pcy4GtQq35sIBKmixyg= Message-ID: <2ea014b3bb38333f9a92f333708fa47f43d25029.camel@student.tugraz.at> Subject: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest From: Leo Prikler To: d@divoplade.fr Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 11:29:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: e6439be3cf9937369293886fb1766df4198875e9.camel@divoplade.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.116 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44452 Cc: 44452@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi divoplade, It is marked as a TODO exactly because it causes a world rebuild. guile-3.0 will presumably be updated on the next core-updates merge, where world rebuilds are acceptable, so be a bit patient until then and use guile-3.0-latest, please :) (Note, that you should also get guile-3.0-latest from specification- >package if that is a concern.) Regards, Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 05 09:48:56 2020 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2020 14:48:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52183 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kagZM-0004wF-Er for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 09:48:56 -0500 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:52749) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kagZK-0004w0-8E for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 09:48:55 -0500 Received: from pc19.home (apoitiers-652-1-495-58.w86-199.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.199.135.58]) (Authenticated sender: d@divoplade.fr) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 996B3240004; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 14:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <918222cbe020f41894f5c9c0d69e9d84de2d703b.camel@divoplade.fr> Subject: Re: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest From: divoplade To: Leo Prikler Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 15:48:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <2ea014b3bb38333f9a92f333708fa47f43d25029.camel@student.tugraz.at> References: <2ea014b3bb38333f9a92f333708fa47f43d25029.camel@student.tugraz.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44452 Cc: 44452@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi! Le jeudi 05 novembre 2020 à 11:29 +0100, Leo Prikler a écrit : > guile-3.0 will presumably be updated on the next core-updates merge, > where world rebuilds are acceptable, so be a bit patient until then > and > use guile-3.0-latest, please :) That's not presumably, that's indeed fixed in core-updates! Sorry, I did not see it. So it will be fixed when core-updates is merged. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 05 10:29:43 2020 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2020 15:29:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53859 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kahCp-0006NB-Hq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 10:29:43 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com ([209.85.128.41]:37751) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kahCo-0006My-A7 for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 10:29:42 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id c16so2010831wmd.2 for <44452@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 07:29:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cn5ty89NqfE2RC2fLToStNByJRtTA1nNYmbO6FnfCBw=; b=f1NJ6qXsqw2alZWZ2t2DojtWOYyl9cN9ymwstH1ZNwKQ5GvTyAZIUlfzJwA9Z+nTu9 y+tAQPU0Km8nzH3Hg571d5qerHZw8jTvJwx4ubZ1kURPhvttVhbOJV12BTTICtARianU Pb8yl9aURGBZNO7IhtqDOi96v4HQpdBG2cwLeGSdWiDePLWMA7EAofNuDwDCoDpbw9Ac VwGzsRnX/dqoc9gTydjDG27L9MTiyaJTUYFKx0h2Y9CE+8ssvBdLqAUYKVx8CDVwmVWs 2woLc+4XDTE6yXOPXOyCpjZPF9QyIx7mDbQcRqTxojVTcD8GnZYycbvobPT2i+31fK8n zi6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cn5ty89NqfE2RC2fLToStNByJRtTA1nNYmbO6FnfCBw=; b=GqW+91qd4+C1HutZ32YJXjyFg8DOikBEjJ8uAh0M/bw6zUGmOln1m9+vpx7mnq4cY4 3NgrMtYRNKzwSlQK3CSG1Ic9kpzo7ez+ihT657bY+ZSabrOFVfPy5PeSDL8W8z//4V00 mgAfGeydhQ9A+jiGlsBIG0VBq46riihDPQjwAn2jrp7YCFqAxF0VzqtisEMJE+8mu1rl KhHZ1qF+FDP1Tqm7PHpCEhYdrf1n6ph5Oxv+Pe0vnClLmoABfE6LI5pSCtw+sgy/ZRIF kLTwrciPWN5xQ3ahWfYSG/2Q8JmacDibi0MA1p5x6p70pSnTXYAKl5RWw1PRLJD4YilK EdQg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531186plviM3njl26dJU9F39yjZG2qMXxhK21X6n8A+UZiZkXdI/ MiUbT3mbE7cFPiQCb9skLszV4ELo5xM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyoQSvUGEn2iL3Log4y8J7v8w/hRzf9OiJ/51JGYl++VwGTqsIU0AsUj1yP1KMa3Iav4H9zQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b746:: with SMTP id h67mr3264507wmf.43.1604590176215; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 07:29:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([88.126.110.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v9sm2980282wrp.11.2020.11.05.07.29.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 05 Nov 2020 07:29:35 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: divoplade , Leo Prikler Subject: Re: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest In-Reply-To: <918222cbe020f41894f5c9c0d69e9d84de2d703b.camel@divoplade.fr> References: <2ea014b3bb38333f9a92f333708fa47f43d25029.camel@student.tugraz.at> <918222cbe020f41894f5c9c0d69e9d84de2d703b.camel@divoplade.fr> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 16:29:02 +0100 Message-ID: <86lfffg6v5.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44452 Cc: 44452@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Thu, 05 Nov 2020 at 15:48, divoplade wrote: > Le jeudi 05 novembre 2020 =C3=A0 11:29 +0100, Leo Prikler a =C3=A9crit : >> guile-3.0 will presumably be updated on the next core-updates merge, >> where world rebuilds are acceptable, so be a bit patient until then >> and >> use guile-3.0-latest, please :) > > That's not presumably, that's indeed fixed in core-updates! Sorry, I > did not see it. Yes. > So it will be fixed when core-updates is merged. And yes. Somehow, the question are: 1. Is it a real error for the ending profile? 2. If no, does the option =E2=80=99--allow-collisions=E2=80=99 make sense = here? And =E2=80=99it=E2=80=99 means uses =E2=80=99guile-3.0=E2=80=99 instead of = =E2=80=99guile-3.0-latest=E2=80=99 in the list. All the best, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 06 05:07:19 2020 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2020 10:07:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55170 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kayeN-0002qQ-3d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 05:07:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44572) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kayeL-0002qA-9V for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 05:07:17 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50949) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kayeF-0001Hu-Du; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 05:07:11 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=57234 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kayeF-0000Bl-0q; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 05:07:11 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: divoplade Subject: Re: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest References: X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 Brumaire an 229 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:07:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: (divoplade's message of "Wed, 04 Nov 2020 19:47:22 +0100") Message-ID: <875z6i23zm.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44452 Cc: 44452@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, divoplade skribis: > I cannot add the "guile-3.0" package in any system configuration (the > part that reads (packages (append (list ... %base-packages)))). When I > do that, I get: =E2=80=98%base-packages=E2=80=99 already contains Guile (=E2=80=98guile-3.0= -latest=E2=80=99 specifically) so maybe you just don=E2=80=99t need to do anything? HTH, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 06 05:22:43 2020 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2020 10:22:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55189 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kaytH-0003Dd-Gf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 05:22:43 -0500 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:51259) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kaytG-0003DG-5O for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 05:22:42 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 86.199.135.58 Received: from pc19.home (apoitiers-652-1-495-58.w86-199.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.199.135.58]) (Authenticated sender: d@divoplade.fr) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1CB11C0014; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 10:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <34ed5d6ac3158347eea2a6ca5a8be5675c4abeb2.camel@divoplade.fr> Subject: Re: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest From: divoplade To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:22:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <875z6i23zm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875z6i23zm.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44452 Cc: 44452@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi! Le vendredi 06 novembre 2020 à 11:07 +0100, Ludovic Courtès a écrit : > ‘%base-packages’ already contains Guile (‘guile-3.0-latest’ > specifically) so maybe you just don’t need to do anything? You're right! I just filtered out guile-3.0-latest from %base-packages and it works! Thank you. divoplade From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 01 16:42:17 2020 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2020 21:42:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33381 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkDPc-00074H-QC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 16:42:17 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com ([209.85.221.52]:33945) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkDPZ-00073p-LS for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 16:42:14 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id k14so5162523wrn.1 for <44452@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 13:42:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wqn1WimSaAttew5awsYTagDzbiXwSN/VWdxEpRZ0KgY=; b=bEUM3vj7NLKgwXjF0Sgo23QZJT5mFGe/dvLsN0ZlRzDRPzgijsmqw8DVtZuyV0+bBc ZWUxJsG7MHDa+Y1+u+tSZjGX+1+aGmpAtgnOyc50OzQNaHsWHs/PoAcva1pJuvh8UmNR yyRZwywleSpdPKc8tMr/ADr7V4nRAMIe4FTEGYGY7tTwiB7AtjdETyKdksF29ptTfAVS uvZSD14y5+50LyqbqtUv1+PQDFG6YWL0Mm+tO+UwxGDFNB/h3FnzmHtv8kFLFotShncx 1QFOW2TehBAD7y/ue01NlYX79Xhu5qKB489FiHuQMjZiw3ZxOWrJNQQX/x4tkYimMe0z uOqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wqn1WimSaAttew5awsYTagDzbiXwSN/VWdxEpRZ0KgY=; b=e5p0CLUwNjY2AT7x2HT/AtEotGiAO2H3etvBZ7ZLgUODzzXwvgC6D2Kd4Wm5nn3HSp N6ozPN3hjrBtWorZ4wEAn62C9xN3YJi4Tc7A595zsPsugpuU65QeBCXRzvMUwUvNinRk NxWCSjYizfACovmLk2vbnAE0UtkwhwyQjDT4jcWRQLPVgr5bICTxyn9vttU6vYNUAaQr 3FHgrYr/KgRvfkATvo+fm1aKxWDKqofiTCN3IOBXVyjVJ+bPZgqkf9R6peY/h46LVAg7 HeR5A2Pm5f53tUemoHuEbkyECx3ibQ8TROdH2CSjZN4CDrvASdVHmSERu9WgfUIg1rpF TThA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306mkLd6qWmHF792DiAztGC/jgIWL2gzCyEpqXopl+3VqV3/kEg WRJKNxY85ezahdD8wl7fW9ZEHpF7rflmxA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuHwhMvtmC6o/tUlKyupez4KYuKlqap/AvH3ADX9gCQkaIpay9hpgD6QJYgZlY/aEZ7ubuTw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f84e:: with SMTP id d14mr6675931wrq.390.1606858927638; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 13:42:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b200sm1723555wmb.10.2020.12.01.13.42.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Dec 2020 13:42:07 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: divoplade Subject: Re: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest References: <875z6i23zm.fsf@gnu.org> <34ed5d6ac3158347eea2a6ca5a8be5675c4abeb2.camel@divoplade.fr> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 22:41:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <34ed5d6ac3158347eea2a6ca5a8be5675c4abeb2.camel@divoplade.fr> (divoplade's message of "Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:22:33 +0100") Message-ID: <86pn3ttd9m.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44452 Cc: 44452@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, This bug #44452 is about issue with Guile declaration. On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 at 11:22, divoplade wrote: > Le vendredi 06 novembre 2020 =C3=A0 11:07 +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s a = =C3=A9crit : >> =E2=80=98%base-packages=E2=80=99 already contains Guile (=E2=80=98guile-= 3.0-latest=E2=80=99 >> specifically) so maybe you just don=E2=80=99t need to do anything? > > You're right! I just filtered out guile-3.0-latest from %base-packages > and it works! What is the status of this bug? I guess it can be closed, right? All the best, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 01 16:57:19 2020 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2020 21:57:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33398 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkDeB-0007QB-6Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 16:57:19 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:59679) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkDe7-0007Pv-OT for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 16:57:18 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 86.254.138.104 Received: from divoplade.home (lfbn-poi-1-813-104.w86-254.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.254.138.104]) (Authenticated sender: d@divoplade.fr) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BD2FE0005; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 21:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest From: divoplade To: zimoun Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 22:56:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86pn3ttd9m.fsf@gmail.com> References: <875z6i23zm.fsf@gnu.org> <34ed5d6ac3158347eea2a6ca5a8be5675c4abeb2.camel@divoplade.fr> <86pn3ttd9m.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44452 Cc: 44452@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Le mardi 01 décembre 2020 à 22:41 +0100, zimoun a écrit : > > > ‘%base-packages’ already contains Guile (‘guile-3.0-latest’ > > > specifically) so maybe you just don’t need to do anything? > > > > You're right! I just filtered out guile-3.0-latest from %base- > > packages > > and it works! > > What is the status of this bug? I guess it can be closed, right? The problem is there until core-updates is merged. The workaround that I use appears to work, but I guess it's not something that is intended. I hope it makes things a little clearer ^^ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 01 17:26:16 2020 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2020 22:26:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33434 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkE6C-00087Q-Ge for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 17:26:16 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com ([209.85.221.50]:42791) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkE68-000872-0s for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 17:26:14 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id l1so5345129wrb.9 for <44452@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 14:26:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e0AThnKW1VFywzrwfofcdzEWNgn6S4u8BQoNpYLAKuM=; b=nx9fcZ3hXkZDrSHQamf1+gp5LbL9IJBgvRTifDXfKerRE19Gg0NEOIhV8ZXO6rw2UD IF6OzsHeg6CqTXdUIQrWxXuU1uYcNieylLZ/XCjAK4svEIfrIzifGYsvRcuc2UyQujm5 KYBM9ANLp7m1qzxkj+je3KpJ/tyizPEFKPVjomPjAKkYLRMLe3iyuldWeORbIG1BwB5C 8wVjf15tWkWQIMzDaTM2mjGuXjt7Wvzc6sJHunSMCcjmCiygTzimLZCFc2DtrtyexnJa 6SO4zU9oUErT4qzdmjP3znAFYSv7iJ3x30XUmjS2luRDkAhNOjHWYB+aRnSkBLo1xM41 Eeog== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e0AThnKW1VFywzrwfofcdzEWNgn6S4u8BQoNpYLAKuM=; b=POV4JIkDtOJvC0JXXxOPKtrA+AKYAO4OVIXJHwLQknitbFef8pn9pihPcUKt21401j 33YkEyaojCNAvGcpdXJvgSh8AuPfYVyk/p7WLPCOt37YpuZHSYHuSZ9QtzPM5cg6acBw uQ2RdO2eL5WIliDDH7YHtOAMNqDw2bbWVdt3v6Z3ETgbwSGxleNDZfnj6hXVnH8tlRV6 8b9QDRbe8EWBb50IiwIjo/I0CResoRnfv6WmtdHQWTxLiMWT1LVs5EStP4u1EXV1Lni7 Gsdq8k5E8nUSASIBnfJ6GWxrD9QV44ptkfVE+pKK+XqAd4NtKz6p3k9usVHPFJy5xKFR mJaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530sU6EKEmW2qIyN1SRxD6dlZ4VM7qwNApQjWrmdB7WNlP6vUvVv bytzr2ws2GPgMxvZBQVONXi6wx9J/FnG6w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy5kI/7KZFYOWSliHuI8VRnCHpo3IRkxZVYWYYjeNan5UIR0RiX/SKZVGARR10mVNCAjLJYzA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:69d1:: with SMTP id s17mr6901890wrw.104.1606861565916; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 14:26:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z19sm1714232wmk.12.2020.12.01.14.26.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Dec 2020 14:26:05 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: divoplade Subject: Re: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest In-Reply-To: References: <875z6i23zm.fsf@gnu.org> <34ed5d6ac3158347eea2a6ca5a8be5675c4abeb2.camel@divoplade.fr> <86pn3ttd9m.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 23:19:35 +0100 Message-ID: <86mtyxtbig.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44452 Cc: 44452@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Tue, 01 Dec 2020 at 22:56, divoplade wrote: > The problem is there until core-updates is merged. The workaround that > I use appears to work, but I guess it's not something that is intended. If the problem is fixed in core-updates, then the problem is fixed. :-) No need to wait the merge to close this bug. IMHO. Moreover, %base-packages already contains Guile (=E2=80=99guile-3.0-latest= =E2=80=99), therefore I am not sure to understand what the bug is about specifically. As I said, I do not know if an option =E2=80=99--allow-collisions=E2=80=99 makes sense here. Anyway, please do not forget to close it. ;-) Cheers, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 02 04:11:11 2020 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2020 09:11:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34194 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkOAJ-0007GC-0z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 04:11:11 -0500 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:55055) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkOAF-0007FF-LL for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 04:11:09 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 86.254.138.104 Received: from divoplade.home (lfbn-poi-1-813-104.w86-254.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.254.138.104]) (Authenticated sender: d@divoplade.fr) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D19C1C0003; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 09:11:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2b467f85aaed6c1a2178278678da648e2170d6a1.camel@divoplade.fr> Subject: Re: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest From: divoplade To: zimoun Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 10:10:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86mtyxtbig.fsf@gmail.com> References: <875z6i23zm.fsf@gnu.org> <34ed5d6ac3158347eea2a6ca5a8be5675c4abeb2.camel@divoplade.fr> <86pn3ttd9m.fsf@gmail.com> <86mtyxtbig.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44452 Cc: 44452@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Le mardi 01 décembre 2020 à 23:19 +0100, zimoun a écrit : > Moreover, %base-packages already contains Guile (’guile-3.0-latest’), > therefore I am not sure to understand what the bug is about > specifically. That's the problem. I need to remove it from %base-packages, otherwise the packages that propagate guile 3.0.2 can't be installed. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 02 06:15:47 2020 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2020 11:15:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34515 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkQ6t-00025s-Ft for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 06:15:47 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f51.google.com ([209.85.128.51]:39504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkQ6r-00025h-Tm for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 06:15:47 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 3so6762090wmg.4 for <44452@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 03:15:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CtN0W89mRpI7qpwiZtvPXlqJtz6X6HpZ513YazEwX+U=; b=TAFh0WwNqxwCMXSYMnCexJ7l+tugjbbeNAeiWEa0m2ByiCkK9RiJNzRFffdeeOMUbR Hhb5NRvXzWonhSH9R0BfjOWNM61wpf93CcPJNQu/lY0XLwYTbeCj86szBvSrDHpS+DTO OlNVYe9WeBptKmq3hxqNHLlDKAooPkxvkhjRnSF8/C+ji5Wsq9+GNYfuo8zrG11RivgY irzwYZak5YJAyBcNuX6KJ8hXoISiLiXuf+cxhB8/UONs0bEbZOgX76qn7G54pdbe+EIS 9/1kZKjTcglSGD6dnr3hTVKOeBJtZ3nm5bLasO7iiw12tZBGlGmYyPuDWQrwVbk22Mlx J1Cg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CtN0W89mRpI7qpwiZtvPXlqJtz6X6HpZ513YazEwX+U=; b=Br8nMzDkkA66o/iMjwqvz6Vdc+amp/ouAVMugpony5myJFuSQ7KBFAcM9GNzmdQmKK SsD3Cx0LDOe+OQPzk5pf2R7xNX43us3Mv3Q1m+0DVlcucwc9w0HdRu6E7f1VyMSTOe1n e0k2IJRrvNdDEdYRsiT8nLoFWgpgs4EDTyZ0Kl0LwCcj1N/YyF7g/tXLS4/vIRj/xNVy vJJu82MKJsYn8djFkq2j9rnr1twcrL/S9s4JqTx2h2ZpWccUe4gteYpUTi6AAD96i+Js 7NB8DgKoPRRYCpyKUsGLjwv+IsVp7heOsvOcmpr3uiIUNAytWZfaSsJwBk2CfT9TqR4e YCiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Gj2QmFONKN41UA1auC0Btc8tYsLnSTpUGPtNe0BHE+eAsOCLs ZVY44+WQ4xUefWzco/bDDOY/dXnRPJAbPA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLSDtGHspUsAbMEHI9hh+gMbEI5mpBtXbhO4x2hASnyfI5XSfqehDILjLVervuNljTNAkicQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:218a:: with SMTP id e10mr2634023wme.73.1606907739612; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 03:15:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a15sm1686564wrn.75.2020.12.02.03.15.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Dec 2020 03:15:39 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: divoplade Subject: Re: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest In-Reply-To: <2b467f85aaed6c1a2178278678da648e2170d6a1.camel@divoplade.fr> References: <875z6i23zm.fsf@gnu.org> <34ed5d6ac3158347eea2a6ca5a8be5675c4abeb2.camel@divoplade.fr> <86pn3ttd9m.fsf@gmail.com> <86mtyxtbig.fsf@gmail.com> <2b467f85aaed6c1a2178278678da648e2170d6a1.camel@divoplade.fr> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:11:12 +0100 Message-ID: <86v9dk1mzz.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44452 Cc: 44452@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Wed, 02 Dec 2020 at 10:10, divoplade wrote: > Le mardi 01 d=C3=A9cembre 2020 =C3=A0 23:19 +0100, zimoun a =C3=A9crit : >> Moreover, %base-packages already contains Guile (=E2=80=99guile-3.0-late= st=E2=80=99), >> therefore I am not sure to understand what the bug is about >> specifically. > > That's the problem. I need to remove it from %base-packages, otherwise > the packages that propagate guile 3.0.2 can't be installed. Sorry if I am slow, but I do not see why this use-case should be a bug. For example, --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ cat /tmp/manif.scm (use-modules (gnu packages guile)) (packages->manifest (list guile-3.0-latest guile-3.0)) $ guix package -m /tmp/manif.scm -p /tmp/bug The following packages will be installed: guile 3.0.2 guile 3.0.4 guix package: error: profile contains conflicting entries for guile guix package: error: first entry: guile@3.0.4 /gnu/store/ah16zr8mmfkqy23r= r7jy5a842ca1q9h1-guile-3.0.4 guix package: error: second entry: guile@3.0.2 /gnu/store/18hp7flyb3yid3y= p49i6qcdq0sbi5l1n-guile-3.0.2 hint: You cannot have two different versions or variants of `guile' in the = same profile. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- And this appends for any package providing multiversions (gcc, clang, guile, etc.). From my understanding, it is a feature. :-) Using the option =E2=80=99--allow-collisions=E2=80=99 avoids the error but = then the version you get is the first in the list, which could be prone error. That=E2=80=99s why I am not convinced it makes sense here. Said explicitly, if you do not want in your profile the package X belonging to %base-packages , do not add the %base-packages list. :-) Or create your custom list (remove the ones you do not want). I do not see what could done on this side. The list %base-packages is 40 packages considered as =E2=80=9Ckind of minimal=E2=80=9D to be able to do minimal st= uff. In one of your message, you were speaking about propagated inputs. Which is the use-case for the option =E2=80=99--allow-collisions=E2=80=99, = IIUC. Do you have examples of such use-cases? Something where: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (packages (append (list pkg-1 pkg-2 =E2=80=A6 %base-packages)) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- leads to an error or an unexpected result? All the best, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 02 06:48:50 2020 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2020 11:48:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34566 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkQcs-0005Bk-GG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 06:48:50 -0500 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:52715) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkQcp-0005BL-Sd for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 06:48:50 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 86.254.138.104 Received: from divoplade.home (lfbn-poi-1-813-104.w86-254.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.254.138.104]) (Authenticated sender: d@divoplade.fr) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3019240006; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest From: divoplade To: zimoun Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:48:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86v9dk1mzz.fsf@gmail.com> References: <875z6i23zm.fsf@gnu.org> <34ed5d6ac3158347eea2a6ca5a8be5675c4abeb2.camel@divoplade.fr> <86pn3ttd9m.fsf@gmail.com> <86mtyxtbig.fsf@gmail.com> <2b467f85aaed6c1a2178278678da648e2170d6a1.camel@divoplade.fr> <86v9dk1mzz.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44452 Cc: 44452@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Le mercredi 02 décembre 2020 à 12:11 +0100, zimoun a écrit : > Said explicitly, if you do not want in your profile the package X > belonging to %base-packages , do not add the %base-packages list. :-) > Or > create your custom list (remove the ones you do not want). I do not > see > what could done on this side. The list %base-packages is 40 packages > considered as “kind of minimal” to be able to do minimal stuff. I would disagree on that, it contains guile 3.0.4 instead of 3.0.2. 3.0.4 is not used, and prevents the other guile packages that require 3.0.2. If it contained 3.0.2 instead, I would 100% agree with what you said there. But it is fixed in core-updates, so we just need to wait for core- updates to be merged. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 02 07:54:48 2020 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2020 12:54:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34663 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkReh-0005DJ-P0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 07:54:48 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com ([209.85.128.46]:50984) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkRef-0005D0-Ok for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 07:54:46 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id c198so6940759wmd.0 for <44452@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 04:54:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yS0l/TreHIHvCJCU2RKIKRubFD7LrGnV57WYMTuE8js=; b=Cdz1VW+BgPaxjUVeQGRcXg2YIpN9KPt4Xbfwz3AxuBPPR4baj2ZGMBpdWuHjbQkbIc qnFLf/BhOmLQr1gQXN7KTX9ehZTvXW5/G4y09j8XZgPCHH1KDD6mRnLR+6144vhHw3Vk i0Rw/6kpelWHIND43YdqnjNl8Y2YTZx81TshxVmMVVg8ynkm/X4neA2m1mE2jhybu/WP HQSsNKbY35tSXN5Jm+j/lRGgTtD0eESwdd/rnkRjn4uqdpsF0OxkpgK1bWu9AIFEOqs8 +H2P0MwchMWg+eIHlhpPHSxNTWJ4SSGqCxtj4cG5okPYEsFvjjKNGKE2c7geek8P11F1 T8lw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yS0l/TreHIHvCJCU2RKIKRubFD7LrGnV57WYMTuE8js=; b=d4BuOh8jtAl6AKd8INVLBenos6NJ6rMKV30uLj5EN6h73pErxaUhwhPjh2WDIoVzYv Oiw+wSL4OvWlRqqCJgz3DDGmcfWFO/RWIbuW0saqEPVQBWWuoExPhYFaBaWKEySJZdM8 M64BdqncLk7pvsJtD0nSln+v9swFJnr3OAIxb7hpDLzprg8TXz8A5a27hW2NujG8W/Ou bbJFo/hIqgL4R3EHIVagw7x9ujOWZ6Ri7KG7C7hstfkIQyFuqFTwmjaoGntpxgT+ROdI mmAQaFTMpRcvEJOd4kUiCPhVNRSihHYmLr0fZjsE7aECyfKbJUjAgfavOCaxI3g4AeIs Zt8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533HZ9Wr62X39SYwpAWALZcX+ZDzNIKlG0aqGjwrB650oeVdDnbd qJx2AErogpzODqQEX6C/KQV0b+bXew356w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyY1yULdGjDPk6wmSAaxMNQsruEbFT9qxNQUH1SUaDihDErjtD035HXcucb4D/0YROiRhaU0Q== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:bc02:: with SMTP id m2mr2988741wmf.59.1606913679664; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 04:54:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a9sm2086147wrp.21.2020.12.02.04.54.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Dec 2020 04:54:38 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: divoplade Subject: Re: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest In-Reply-To: References: <875z6i23zm.fsf@gnu.org> <34ed5d6ac3158347eea2a6ca5a8be5675c4abeb2.camel@divoplade.fr> <86pn3ttd9m.fsf@gmail.com> <86mtyxtbig.fsf@gmail.com> <2b467f85aaed6c1a2178278678da648e2170d6a1.camel@divoplade.fr> <86v9dk1mzz.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:50:30 +0100 Message-ID: <86k0u01ieh.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44452 Cc: 44452@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Wed, 02 Dec 2020 at 12:48, divoplade wrote: > Le mercredi 02 d=C3=A9cembre 2020 =C3=A0 12:11 +0100, zimoun a =C3=A9crit= : >> Said explicitly, if you do not want in your profile the package X >> belonging to %base-packages , do not add the %base-packages list. :-)=20 >> Or >> create your custom list (remove the ones you do not want). I do not >> see >> what could done on this side. The list %base-packages is 40 packages >> considered as =E2=80=9Ckind of minimal=E2=80=9D to be able to do minimal= stuff. > > I would disagree on that, it contains guile 3.0.4 instead of 3.0.2. > 3.0.4 is not used, and prevents the other guile packages that require > 3.0.2. If it contained 3.0.2 instead, I would 100% agree with what you > said there. Again, sorry to be slow. But I really try to understand. :-) I have been annoyed by such things about different Guile with the website [1]. What I get with 353bdae (pre-1.2) or f4450e8 (post-1.2): --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix install guile -p /tmp/guile The following package will be installed: guile 3.0.4 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- so why are you are saying 3.0.4 is not used when it is the default? Well, if I understand correctly, your point is the inconsistency between the default Guile (3.0-latest, i.e., currently 3.0.4) and the Guile (3.0, i.e., currently 3.0.2) used by most packages in guile-xyz.scm, especially when there is bytecode difference. Right? 1: All the best, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 03 12:10:40 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2020 17:10:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41626 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kks7r-00059O-Ta for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:10:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33604) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kks7q-000599-5A for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:10:38 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47325) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kks7k-0007VK-Ex for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:10:33 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=51470 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kks7h-00018b-M1 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:10:31 -0500 Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 18:10:28 +0100 Message-Id: <87r1o6byt7.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #44452 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 44452 notabug close 44452 quit From unknown Fri Jun 20 18:22:13 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2021 12:24:10 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator