GNU bug report logs - #44401
[PATCH] gnu: poetry: Update to 1.1.4.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #20 received at 44401 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Sébastien Lerique <sl <at> eauchat.org>
To: Tanguy LE CARROUR <tanguy <at> bioneland.org>
Cc: 44401 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: poetry: Update to 1.1.4.
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 11:29:15 +0100

Hi Tanguy,

>> So far I had to update:
>> - python-keyring to 21.5.0,
>> - python-setuptools to 50.3.2,
>> - python-virtualenv to 20.2.1,
>> - python-distlib to 0.3.1,
>> - python-tomlkit to 0.7.0,
>> - and use requests-toolbelt-0.9.1 in poetry's package 
>> definition
>>
>> And I was now missing poetry-core, which I see you have done. 
>> This
>> is turning into a large patchset, and on my side it's still 
>> with
>> some tests disabled (though I'm still planning to activate 
>> them).
>
> The main problem is `python-distlib`. So based on Marius' 
> comment, I
> created a `python-distlib/next`.
>
> This is part of v5 here: 
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=44077
>

Indeed, the /next solution was a good idea to keep moving. I 
second your question on who/what makes sure that the /next package 
is removed once python-distlib is upgraded (maybe simply add a 
FIXME to python-distlib so whoever upgrades it is notified).

>>> It seems that there's also a problem with the latest version 
>>> of
>>> keyring on Guix:
>>> https://github.com/jaraco/keyring/issues/469
>>> But I'm (slowly) working on it!
>>
>> Yes, I found that simply adding python-setuptools (aside from
>> python-setuptools-scm) to the native-inputs made the 
>> build-system
>> recognize the version.
>
> That's great!! You could add a comment with your solution to the 
> issue,
> for the sake of documenting it.
>

Done :)

>> Once I have your latest patch I should probably be able to
>> converge on what you have done. Here is my current patchset for
>> reference: http://0x0.st/i7b_.diff , I'm working on
>> 4a914de930a8317cab5bc11bdb608e3a3da3d1ad. I don't know whether 
>> to
>> send parts of this as separate patches or not.
>
> Sounds like a plan! :-)
>
> Can I suggest that you wait for #44077 to be merged and then 
> submit your
> improvements?!

Yes! I'll do that.

Sébastien

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.