GNU bug report logs - #44341
27.1; define-minor-mode generates inaccurate docstring

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com>, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 44341 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Thibault Polge <thibault <at> thb.lt>
Subject: bug#44341: 27.1; define-minor-mode generates inaccurate docstring
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 08:18:24 -0800 (PST)

> We should definitely signal an error here. A form such as (my-mode
> 'enable) actually disabling the mode is very confusing. The mode
> function needs to check for the various cases anyway, it might as well
> use `cond' and signal an error in the non-matching case.

Not to argue, but this kind of thing is all over
Emacs Lisp.

The ability to use an unspecified non-nil value,
to mean/do something that might work against the
natural-language "meaning" of the name of a
symbol argument, is just one example of the vast
amounts of rope that Lisp gives its users to hang
themselves with.

Do you really think `define-minor-mode' should
be fiddled with specially here, to prevent use
of an unfortunately named symbol arg to disable
the mode?

`define-minor-mode' and its doc, and the doc of
minor modes, are already complex/confusing enough.
Do you think fiddling to eliminate confusion over
poorly named symbol values won't actually add to
that confusion?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.