Subject: bug#4433: 23.1; dolist vs dolist

From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:58:46 +0200

"Drew Adams" <[email-masked]> writes:

> Even more important is to document this in the Elisp manual. State
> clearly that `dolist' (the one provided by Emacs, without cl.el) is
> not the same as the `dolist' of Common Lisp or the `dolist' of cl.el,
> both of which support `return-from', and so on.

If you have a definition of `return-from', then you have the cl.el
`dolist', so I don't really see the point.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/