From ssd@mmae.ucf.edu Mon Sep 14 10:41:53 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 14 Sep 2009 17:41:53 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8EHfpw0008837 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:41:52 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MnFYk-0005pA-RW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:41:50 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MnFYg-0005mP-Qh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:41:50 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41593 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MnFYg-0005mE-Lb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:41:46 -0400 Received: from carnot.engr.ucf.edu ([132.170.200.20]:39475) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MnFYg-0003Xi-5M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:41:46 -0400 Received: from ssd by carnot.engr.ucf.edu with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 1MnFY5-0002J9-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:41:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:41:09 -0400 From: Steven Dick To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 23.1; xim hides minibuffer or bottom line of the frame Message-ID: <20090914174109.GA8708@mmae.ucf.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug and the precise symptoms of the bug: The xim menu is positioned incorrectly, and obscures the bottom line of the frame. Usually this is the minibuffer, making the minibuffer unreadable unless it is resized. If the minibuffer is split off into its own frame, then the status bar for the bottom window is totally covered up, although the xim menu in the separate minibuffer window is correctly placed on its own line. Usually the XIM menu is placed within one character of the left side of the window on top of the minibuffer line or status bar. If the window is stretched horizontally, it seems to keep a fixed position from the right side, so at least a part of the minibuffer becomes usable. This bug can be worked around by disabling XIM completely, either with the configure option --without-xim at compile time, or by setting the X resource emacs*useXIM: false It would be nice if there was an option to control placement of the XIM menu, but at the very least, this placement bug should be fixed. This bug was exhibited by both the blastwave precompiled version (below) and the latest version (23.1.3?) compiled from sources on the same platform. In GNU Emacs 23.1.1 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars) of 2009-08-19 on build8s configured using `configure '--prefix=/opt/csw' '--with-x-toolkit=athena' 'CC=gcc' 'CFLAGS=-O3 -mcpu=v8 ' 'CPPFLAGS= -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/gcc3/include -I/opt/csw/gcc3/include/c++/3.4.6 -I/opt/csw/include '' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: nil value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: nil default-enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Lisp Interaction Minor modes in effect: desktop-save-mode: t tooltip-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t global-auto-composition-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 23 07:19:50 2019 Received: (at 4428) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2019 11:19:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32805 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNEg9-0006jM-PB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 07:19:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:38775) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNEg8-0006j8-7A for 4428@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 07:19:48 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id w8so9936296plq.5 for <4428@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 04:19:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vNTaBXyGviGbGiJE/xvc13Ps7diTknNZVNvzrcm1j/4=; b=QK5wgIOGeKnQWur9I57BxfuARude/37mevRmZQlGD/nIE9O690EN/zy8dygKeIErxG JvHXS4dgF6nz680qadbWIqfE3tz/01YSR0OBPFiUIza0thOczVU2ULNrCnZ0jkB+gwYO y7biBTAgSKh/lFbGrR7vnEXqtcXeKlaEAinfoUnb+YLc1Z29n0ft2dJoHowdnjoouF1k 3b2uLOHxcFpnpnMTwerjs+NXVcc2LuDfvvPODtR7u1PNLAU8bYfMhbdyyEYvD3FkLYeH JEuFmf/C54NZMomy9sHh9DtD83HkcjD8hw+CPVrAvmetL2Fg3r80K6hI6crvWNhzet9N nIFw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW4ne0piHl9d3ILQ/OOECtjtk6nMoaKim2HkWlFK4jAMWtLvPxp EBe3ISL7asokzrQ87hnitiCXatwGjGHjJ8em8k8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz6N+nrsrLoXS/A7O7qcOMEjRKmhzvI+1fWVCdbjwq3x/EA9qRyCrEvQeMYaNVHjGZ3vcINxpLY9WeEHp2qw5A= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a98c:: with SMTP id bh12mr9248924plb.128.1571829582267; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 04:19:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Stefan Kangas Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:19:31 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#4428: 23.1; xim hides minibuffer or bottom line of the frame To: Steven Dick Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 4428 Cc: 4428@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Steven Dick writes: > Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug > and the precise symptoms of the bug: > > The xim menu is positioned incorrectly, and obscures the bottom line of > the frame. Usually this is the minibuffer, making the minibuffer unreadable > unless it is resized. If the minibuffer is split off into its own > frame, then the status bar for the bottom window is totally covered > up, although the xim menu in the separate minibuffer window is > correctly placed on its own line. > > Usually the XIM menu is placed within one character of the left side > of the window on top of the minibuffer line or status bar. If the > window is stretched horizontally, it seems to keep a fixed position > from the right side, so at least a part of the minibuffer becomes > usable. > > This bug can be worked around by disabling XIM completely, either with the > configure option --without-xim at compile time, or by setting the X resource > emacs*useXIM: false > > It would be nice if there was an option to control placement of the XIM menu, > but at the very least, this placement bug should be fixed. > > This bug was exhibited by both the blastwave precompiled version (below) > and the latest version (23.1.3?) compiled from sources on the same platform. This bug was reported 10 years ago, but unfortunately never got a reply at the time. Are you still seeing this problem on a modern version of Emacs? Best regards, Stefan Kangas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 03 05:37:23 2021 Received: (at 4428) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2021 09:37:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42359 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lojn1-0005fb-Ma for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 05:37:23 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41060) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lojn0-0005fL-JM for 4428@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 05:37:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=S1AhxPTeoZG87h7o3Al4kPNz2deeWBBNBL3sJdgBaIw=; b=uZiACwsmkRMWOiz7PNSZQhvJ2x 5MVvfnR5YRrICQrOPuLFQLv33+g95zgdCxAQMe911xn9zKeagCmuZi/RXKg/872/YLrw8FR9pTsGR r7ksXWvvNO8T9GspkOV3k7MuYC1Xi93Z6r6ebpVjl0LRDWARAX6y+yRuNN5/FJ/Or+xc=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lojmr-0000Tx-D6; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 11:37:15 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#4428: 23.1; xim hides minibuffer or bottom line of the frame References: <20090914174109.GA8708@mmae.ucf.edu> X-Now-Playing: Little Simz's _Grey Area_: "Offence" Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 11:37:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:19:31 +0200") Message-ID: <87czt35lx3.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > Are you still seeing this problem on a modern version of Emacs? More information was requested, but no response was given within a year, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 4428 Cc: Steven Dick , 4428@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Stefan Kangas writes: > Are you still seeing this problem on a modern version of Emacs? More information was requested, but no response was given within a year, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 03 05:37:29 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2021 09:37:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42362 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lojn6-0005fv-Uc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 05:37:29 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41076) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lojn5-0005fU-PL for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 05:37:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=bHj9wyII0+ZDXUSqSuO71T4QlDACip+3INo7JOpl75Q=; b=vW/s25asUlARN9Q4Djv+cuT55L 75RwjPmloSSvR/PuXgQbDH6RBM4/6u+5n3LKZNMD+x1KrEzqpexOfAmV09fx3QiiK1mfbwOze7RZ9 pbNHOtzG9JFWyYZAwOVcjunU3/8iwLnp90NM1KBAQGuRdEiTjc+OC5Y14HpapGbSlWIg=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lojmy-0000U3-Bc for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 11:37:22 +0200 Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 11:37:19 +0200 Message-Id: <87bl8n5lww.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #4428 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 4428 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) close 4428 quit From unknown Thu Aug 21 12:09:59 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator