GNU bug report logs - #44205
[PATCH] Add new function seq-remove-item

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Cc: 44205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#44205: [PATCH] Add new function seq-remove-item
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 13:49:55 +0100

Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> writes:

> I found myself reaching for a version of `seq-remove' where I don't have
> to supply a lambda but can just give an item.  Ergo, the attached.
>
>     (seq-remove-item 2 '(1 2 3))  => (1 3)
>
> I find it a whole lot nicer than:
>
>     (seq-remove (lambda (a) (= a 2)) '(1 2 3))  => (1 3)

Isn't this just

(remove 2 '(1 2 3)) => (1 3)

though?  I don't think seq.el needs to replicate the basic list
functions...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.