GNU bug report logs - #44112
SBCL is not reproducible

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 08:13:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Hendursaga <hendursaga <at> aol.com>, 44112 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: glv <at> posteo.net
Subject: bug#44112: 
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 19:50:37 +0100
Hi,

Thank you for the follow up.

On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 12:22, Hendursaga via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> The patch[1] has been closed for some time, is there any other pending patches blocking going forward? 
>
> [1] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583

Indeed, but the package sbcl is not yet reproducible.  The remaining
issue is about PDF.

Using Guix 28d1e51, I get:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ diff -r --no-dereference /gnu/store/0q9z6j5ml4rkfrg57axznasdjfm7x803-sbcl-2.2.11-doc{,-check}
Binary files /gnu/store/0q9z6j5ml4rkfrg57axznasdjfm7x803-sbcl-2.2.11-doc/share/doc/sbcl/sbcl.pdf and /gnu/store/0q9z6j5ml4rkfrg57axznasdjfm7x803-sbcl-2.2.11-doc-check/share/doc/sbcl/sbcl.pdf differ
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Cheers,
simon




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 188 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.