GNU bug report logs - #44112
SBCL is not reproducible

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 44112 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 10:19:37 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 14:41, Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> wrote:
>> zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>> Using Guix 58af4c9, the package ’sbcl’ seems not-reproducible.
>
> [...]
>
>> Removing this source file timestamp from compiled files would simplify
>> things. Maybe nothing really depends on it and it would be possible...
>
> Any news from upstream?  Still unreproducible for me.
>
>
> All the best,
> simon

So far Slime still uses the function getting the source file timestamp,
so these timestamps can't be removed from SBCL.
A patch for Slime would be accepted (see [2]), but as far as I know
nobody has worked on it yet.

[2] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.