GNU bug report logs - #44112
SBCL is not reproducible

Previous Next

Full log

Message #32 received at 44112 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 44112 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: Re: bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:19:08 +0200

Hi Guillaume,

Thank you for asking upstream.


On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 18:45, Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> wrote:

> A developer of SBCL agrees that the timestamp should be removed [1], but
> currently Slime has a function depending on it. I asked if this could
> be fixed [2]. We'll see...
>
> [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/sbcl/mailman/message/37133640/

Ouch!  Hard to read when not subscribed. :-)

> [2] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583

If upstream does not want to patch, do you think it is doable to patch
SLIME and maintain the patch with the Guix package?

Thanks,
simon

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.