GNU bug report logs - #44112
SBCL is not reproducible

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 08:13:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Full log


Message #26 received at 44112 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 44112 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: Re: bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:45:43 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:

>> Removing this source file timestamp from compiled files would simplify
>> things. Maybe nothing really depends on it and it would be possible...
>
>Thanks for the explanation.

A developer of SBCL agrees that the timestamp should be removed [1], but
currently Slime has a function depending on it. I asked if this could
be fixed [2]. We'll see...

[1] https://sourceforge.net/p/sbcl/mailman/message/37133640/
[2] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 188 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.