Subject: Re: bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 10:19:37 +0100

zimoun <[email-masked]> skribis:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 14:41, Guillaume Le Vaillant <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> zimoun <[email-masked]> skribis:
>>
>>> Using Guix 58af4c9, the package ’sbcl’ seems not-reproducible.
>
> [...]
>
>> Removing this source file timestamp from compiled files would simplify
>> things. Maybe nothing really depends on it and it would be possible...
>
> Any news from upstream?  Still unreproducible for me.
>
>
> All the best,
> simon

So far Slime still uses the function getting the source file timestamp,
so these timestamps can't be removed from SBCL.
A patch for Slime would be accepted (see [2]), but as far as I know
nobody has worked on it yet.

[2] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583