Subject: Re: bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible

From: zimoun <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:48:01 +0100

Hi,

On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 14:41, Guillaume Le Vaillant <[email-masked]> wrote:
> zimoun <[email-masked]> skribis:
>
>> Using Guix 58af4c9, the package ’sbcl’ seems not-reproducible.

[...]

> Removing this source file timestamp from compiled files would simplify
> things. Maybe nothing really depends on it and it would be possible...

Any news from upstream?  Still unreproducible for me.

All the best,
simon