Subject: Re: bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible

From: zimoun <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:19:08 +0200

Hi Guillaume,

Thank you for asking upstream.

On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 18:45, Guillaume Le Vaillant <[email-masked]> wrote:

> A developer of SBCL agrees that the timestamp should be removed [1], but
> currently Slime has a function depending on it. I asked if this could
> be fixed [2]. We'll see...
>
> [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/sbcl/mailman/message/37133640/

Ouch!  Hard to read when not subscribed. :-)

> [2] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583

If upstream does not want to patch, do you think it is doable to patch
SLIME and maintain the patch with the Guix package?

Thanks,
simon