From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 20 20:43:56 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2020 00:43:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47227 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kV2EN-00043X-NH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:43:55 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:51984) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kV2EM-00043Q-2u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:43:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kV2EG-0005Kn-GE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:43:48 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:35427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kV2EC-0002N5-Ao for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:43:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1603241021; bh=8NCWj+OkWiP92ITETm7+9mWWhS6ZNtPMxvNeeSYgU2U=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Subject; b=EqaBNIAuWZL8xFy7ba9r3gxi/mQcoX1gpQ/zsfrg+75g/TL/+diLHjsSv/KcQS5CW G0hkxeZ3C23QEz/ddk3Wj4gTtXK8cApxUD8uGu+IG2abtP/VCq9iuYwmy7LR90iSsD V+cy/pujYEvELvwKfLu9T0C9uLueYuwgL2E1moG8= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([72.89.170.172]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MTRQq-1ksF051HkC-00TjAu for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 02:43:41 +0200 Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:43:38 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Emacs Bug Reporting Subject: create alias for info-apropos Message-ID: <20201021004338.5pn7hy2zzg4okbgv@E15-2016.optimum.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:tDlCAn/3j2RZQWeF4gvFikcieODEfC15RXZHw/HaTpz6cSiMtFW H9jvFjf1kmXXyh+7HHZ6Fz9p3n/xywzfAeicBaGxY0xjzo1pVPkVoYdBs9p+ZNUrqvvE3Tj MwTxFpEyAwFR4ueKK21OFtqnRJY98Ts+Fu8+l8jYAJ8ba+mf1HqI92xduS3/z1mOi51CetX lfvioqV5ZTiXr10N+/3EA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:4y9OFaBBu9g=:mcF/z7RIcPUCC+0+dwGuNQ CmEH2239FP6+oX2nzi1RNjSBMyby74v4nOpBT8/ELv5+G9vK5KgAmHJnAsUkfZVlJ7viACIC2 HrgRlqXjTzdqbqCelkizGxns8/v74QmXsT+YNS32c1jNCQ5wE9z2J9uMTfI6XGb5qNT6zByKI KjQUIf1uqXXegksz1FiEKXG41R3TJnZ938IPDLB/rPxR1wqvpoS70Q6ByuVtT9Dtrz4QHqUGD ZykatD99xDtsW2jNvErRH0UzZd35htFxj2Wc/g4AXhGVWi8/oVSMQCc5t2euEKFdARJ8zbFPc eHXaWceXKJVbHIiCbYEuWI4I/eGFU33WzBmEyVDHxXdQo/8qt6Ai0w9Xbyw6VpZ1jr/Q9KbIO mDqyOHDhLlq3AJTPSZ0KPcJQZj8/2Y6EKTU1dxyDP2ku0VpzzYG3ICbCFMgzztwtOG7ILTZ86 zDan/SZgvR3IVFyFRR+bIV2QxfVbtaEBC8C6qEwvy6bC54Q8T4/OIuXifvwYL6gEgZFDYKZUR yM1UML/2B5BciiW4N1DBCTfnbxT9Wz51UEmLHUGRQdiL5dnmZLAh1OXmQOQDdCywUvG7X6b5g k+kvn91LXCtHvahIsyMXOULxnYL8JxTOIexqoN8SunR8N6e6oHG3LWcQTbP+k1ttnNVSmFU7K EMDxW1yV+Guw0+nfj1dKPwNCEZilV2w9fgBQcvOm7irM7fuYXZhzNFPOYE2n95IKOIgccqQYJ N3FT3tNmtP2chleCqP1tXgS/2oU/VXmTOMiqLXyAZZ5XlLl3v+Bk9bqXk9htJAzRYTAh7Dvm4 WHF20XWpDBMib0esYnv+sf7sxP+DKR/LyDcht20PfQdwMt052hfiWIv9SCmba+bU+OTF/oB5a gLPu1jleKdjaQz1E9aWw== Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.21; envelope-from=boruch_baum@gmx.com; helo=mout.gmx.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/20 20:43:42 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) My expectation was that the "apropos" function for info functions would follow the naming convention of other apropos functions: apropos-info. Instead, the function is `info-apropos'. Creating the alias would benefit user looking for completion options, and users expecting consistency in the name of emacs functions. =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 20 22:34:11 2020 Received: (at 44110) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2020 02:34:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47273 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kV3x4-0006qd-UX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:34:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52626) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kV3x2-0006qP-8l for 44110@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:34:10 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40036) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kV3ww-0006CG-9s; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:34:02 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2138 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kV3wu-0007ui-Rf; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:34:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 05:34:11 +0300 Message-Id: <834kmonw7w.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Boruch Baum In-Reply-To: <20201021004338.5pn7hy2zzg4okbgv@E15-2016.optimum.net> (message from Boruch Baum on Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:43:38 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#44110: create alias for info-apropos References: <20201021004338.5pn7hy2zzg4okbgv@E15-2016.optimum.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44110 Cc: 44110@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:43:38 -0400 > From: Boruch Baum > > My expectation was that the "apropos" function for info functions would > follow the naming convention of other apropos functions: apropos-info. > Instead, the function is `info-apropos'. This is due to our naming conventions: that function is defined in info.el. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 20 22:59:26 2020 Received: (at 44110) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2020 02:59:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47295 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kV4LW-0007T5-3S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:59:26 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:44313) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kV4LT-0007Sq-EB for 44110@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:59:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1603249156; bh=cvodddvBIRXwXSjEfwvMcIOHZdHUrVWp0qKN1RA1J8E=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Mh704sMUMo+JgR2syok+qqfn2yzVMOwHxbd5Dn1u6olV3Oh/If2LJIKnMKyVsVpaS CRb8GIFOpptOBGZrCU2XOVxhyPDQnM3ae1VuzC7knCAZjQzN/BDVRiAenmtQR6atoz 3eB8YTh430e9lG83TNl6UlcuwEgXGxQkYMKEDKhc= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([72.89.170.172]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MvbG2-1kBkZe1wKE-00scyF; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 04:59:16 +0200 Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:59:13 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#44110: create alias for info-apropos Message-ID: <20201021025913.m6egrgkzbcbsas4n@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20201021004338.5pn7hy2zzg4okbgv@E15-2016.optimum.net> <834kmonw7w.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <834kmonw7w.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:pAd7bKaTlfIumrh7/tHEs1dwSz93hg6GhmmXBzgsI9kaUuSHwMl EhDRtr2RYtNasrqkoRUxJnP8hGKwKLp6+r8A2LUJyfmA5bmRSfB3fgD9L+d8IxB/6xhi18B 1y6lBdmPjTEQJ99+xBuuUdsyVOBsLAuk0mvLHDEKmdCReE0/mo+5wjwBD+2QgfqleKWAIqW Tl+ZowzMAiwxg76x3uw4w== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:UftHAsWuGfg=:TkoUnAa7ojWIp+JYGeNWfX g2k+NxktHFFzJFtGcPe/1aT+6DCMcDzVnobCBBPe07/ddqruCn809iQm5MBgjwK5knTVDa1QW IEo5mKL7PvsM9oznhcpE+dBklN/yEQKUZofSw8nrg5dEsqKwtiWFdck1DQNNcjCnfErg9POwa 3rd9cFwyUIMdLFfinKxQPwfsE+jAdWKH4nELA2dsCFyAcUnMfJcFDYIRp1Gv5myEAhqTUi8T3 PhDoI3vCyMBdfYU5ZdQJ7AFFE025lnOhnna01X2s8uCvmI0FFg83SNxp0HTu50yORPj5oezTj IUwA3q2M2NP34YxLHdi3NY1/yWlaAhGvI2jGFIphTbaRFvbHDmE0k1YxmM6i/SsaZmI82fL05 WRDw+75fT7EytyWMF2d/0eEtDcfToLiEuA7AGUxu2o7ZL3HlImnQ6IoF4cKcQd1nHC+3Hq7LV XVtP1B5LI9EDjkT83aPCzRLNfLyrT5KOGxiNQtYv7s+MUBqKgUmnXk3DGkOUAsnXe4BeV46Zy Ar8aN9fQxj/VbFDkAyH0eX+FEarRIlnM6kt6CPYEr9CtuXRNj7QYOueTkMx0sfOiGEwEQbvSZ SnkgFZYI4KHa807D38tqeKFjaMsWcvZs+Syp1GsesHYqseNAN+/GlESo+5iyEOTB6axvuRTCi c1C5z+E8ibIqN84aCKHgXmVZbi3yOrN+cwfGZedGIIb1fjJRPKYGhhHtrNQDW/e31Bys1DX9S lW71J88XT33heLmNqRtLHknO8yrhORXSFizrN9klqz3esfRaxWTHNFZS5WvSPPEvg3tfuvVne XAhAu2maRUe/2hjPmOKRkAxZr9tAdEaNFEbZtb54SlC9Y+zamX+JNcdoqr//1xS2S2nawjBKx sn+/OdRDv3mqEFxwHmFQ== Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44110 Cc: 44110@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2020-10-21 05:34, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:43:38 -0400 > > From: Boruch Baum > > > > My expectation was that the "apropos" function for info functions woul= d > > follow the naming convention of other apropos functions: apropos-info. > > Instead, the function is `info-apropos'. > > This is due to our naming conventions: that function is defined in > info.el. Does that necessary mean that an alias can't exist for the sake of its benefits to users? =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 21 10:04:49 2020 Received: (at 44110) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2020 14:04:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50093 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVEjQ-0000TW-U7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:04:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35918) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVEjP-0000TK-Of for 44110@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:04:48 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49600) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVEjK-0000Ya-9i; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:04:42 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4389 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kVEjG-0004qa-23; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:04:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 17:04:48 +0300 Message-Id: <83zh4fn08v.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Boruch Baum In-Reply-To: <20201021025913.m6egrgkzbcbsas4n@E15-2016.optimum.net> (message from Boruch Baum on Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:59:13 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#44110: create alias for info-apropos References: <20201021004338.5pn7hy2zzg4okbgv@E15-2016.optimum.net> <834kmonw7w.fsf@gnu.org> <20201021025913.m6egrgkzbcbsas4n@E15-2016.optimum.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44110 Cc: 44110@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:59:13 -0400 > From: Boruch Baum > Cc: 44110@debbugs.gnu.org > > On 2020-10-21 05:34, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:43:38 -0400 > > > From: Boruch Baum > > > > > > My expectation was that the "apropos" function for info functions would > > > follow the naming convention of other apropos functions: apropos-info. > > > Instead, the function is `info-apropos'. > > > > This is due to our naming conventions: that function is defined in > > info.el. > > Does that necessary mean that an alias can't exist for the sake of its > benefits to users? I didn't say that. I just tried to explain why your expectation was not necessarily justified. As for adding an alias, if you type "M-x *-apropos TAB", you'll see that we have quite a few of commands whose names are SOMETHING-apropos, so info-apropos is not necessarily the odd one out. I'll let others speak up their minds on this. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 22 08:52:02 2020 Received: (at 44110) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2020 12:52:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51732 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVa4Y-0006rX-7H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:52:02 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:42796) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVa4W-0006r4-VG for 44110@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:52:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=CT7C6eHdANQF9F0Sq4q6MWjj/do+KVrTy5L5rBT/x24=; b=nj96R/c8OWzMWBnqGWnB9wdfuo TF8Kh8JVq21YHeJkNIhoYlZl4KQV2RrYkfH32UkImOSTkNB0fcTn6eltQXVtpCP7jCNfL9Z7Nton/ KZMRqZcmUUphIhTYeAk4miAkzyYk02fj59krOp6lTjGMaYIN/WxPdTRLWLugoZjhlwk8=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kVa4O-0003Oc-5S; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:51:54 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#44110: create alias for info-apropos References: <20201021004338.5pn7hy2zzg4okbgv@E15-2016.optimum.net> <834kmonw7w.fsf@gnu.org> <20201021025913.m6egrgkzbcbsas4n@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83zh4fn08v.fsf@gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: LCD Soundsystem's _Freak Out Starry Eyes_: "North American Scum (Anciritic Club)" Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:51:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83zh4fn08v.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 21 Oct 2020 17:04:48 +0300") Message-ID: <87r1pqmnix.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > As for adding an alias, if you type "M-x *-apropos TAB", you'll see > that we have quite a few of commands whose names are > SOMETHING-apropos, so info-apropos is not necessarily the odd one > out. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44110 Cc: 44110@debbugs.gnu.org, Boruch Baum X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > As for adding an alias, if you type "M-x *-apropos TAB", you'll see > that we have quite a few of commands whose names are > SOMETHING-apropos, so info-apropos is not necessarily the odd one > out. I'll let others speak up their minds on this. Yeah, I don't think adding an alias here would be very helpful, so I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 22 08:52:13 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2020 12:52:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51735 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVa4i-0006s4-Fa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:52:12 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:42814) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVa4g-0006rp-BE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:52:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vOYSXW2h37btBS3/n0MxtIZ/rB4zyCK7IH4VZniv39E=; b=RpxxkVvefhje8utIZJKF+yZb9i Xbc+bH6b2IfIIXXi/5gK+wy/c5yswc37fWcgsd75h6rV3bxx9lJJ22jmAe1uGS7dRcwpZUcSyIGsI Y//kpWy8890O3lmLXkwosM/Ta5h+Q0XXDbGVwtSgwS1aTOGxQ2G+1X9gywCCSXbeUjKY=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kVa4Y-0003Op-GY for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:52:04 +0200 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:52:01 +0200 Message-Id: <87pn5amnim.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #44110 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 44110 wontfix close 44110 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 44110 wontfix close 44110 quit From unknown Tue Jun 17 01:39:35 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator