GNU bug report logs -
#44110
create alias for info-apropos
Previous Next
Reported by: Boruch Baum <boruch_baum <at> gmx.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:44:01 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: wontfix
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 44110 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 44110 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44110
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:44:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Boruch Baum <boruch_baum <at> gmx.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:44:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
My expectation was that the "apropos" function for info functions would
follow the naming convention of other apropos functions: apropos-info.
Instead, the function is `info-apropos'.
Creating the alias would benefit user looking for completion options,
and users expecting consistency in the name of emacs functions.
--
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44110
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 21 Oct 2020 02:35:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 44110 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:43:38 -0400
> From: Boruch Baum <boruch_baum <at> gmx.com>
>
> My expectation was that the "apropos" function for info functions would
> follow the naming convention of other apropos functions: apropos-info.
> Instead, the function is `info-apropos'.
This is due to our naming conventions: that function is defined in
info.el.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44110
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 21 Oct 2020 03:00:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 44110 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2020-10-21 05:34, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:43:38 -0400
> > From: Boruch Baum <boruch_baum <at> gmx.com>
> >
> > My expectation was that the "apropos" function for info functions would
> > follow the naming convention of other apropos functions: apropos-info.
> > Instead, the function is `info-apropos'.
>
> This is due to our naming conventions: that function is defined in
> info.el.
Does that necessary mean that an alias can't exist for the sake of its
benefits to users?
--
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44110
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 44110 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:59:13 -0400
> From: Boruch Baum <boruch_baum <at> gmx.com>
> Cc: 44110 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> On 2020-10-21 05:34, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:43:38 -0400
> > > From: Boruch Baum <boruch_baum <at> gmx.com>
> > >
> > > My expectation was that the "apropos" function for info functions would
> > > follow the naming convention of other apropos functions: apropos-info.
> > > Instead, the function is `info-apropos'.
> >
> > This is due to our naming conventions: that function is defined in
> > info.el.
>
> Does that necessary mean that an alias can't exist for the sake of its
> benefits to users?
I didn't say that. I just tried to explain why your expectation was
not necessarily justified.
As for adding an alias, if you type "M-x *-apropos TAB", you'll see
that we have quite a few of commands whose names are
SOMETHING-apropos, so info-apropos is not necessarily the odd one
out. I'll let others speak up their minds on this.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44110
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:53:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 44110 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> As for adding an alias, if you type "M-x *-apropos TAB", you'll see
> that we have quite a few of commands whose names are
> SOMETHING-apropos, so info-apropos is not necessarily the odd one
> out. I'll let others speak up their minds on this.
Yeah, I don't think adding an alias here would be very helpful, so I'm
closing this bug report.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Added tag(s) wontfix.
Request was from
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:53:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug closed, send any further explanations to
44110 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Boruch Baum <boruch_baum <at> gmx.com>
Request was from
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:53:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 209 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.