GNU bug report logs - #44077
[PATCH 0/2] gnu: poetry: Update to 1.1.3.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy <at> bioneland.org>

Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 13:28:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #80 received at 44077 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: Tanguy LE CARROUR <tanguy <at> bioneland.org>
Cc: 44077 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: gnu: poetry: Update to 1.1.4.
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 16:41:14 +0100
Hello,

Tanguy LE CARROUR <tanguy <at> bioneland.org> writes:

> Would have it been better for me to submit separate patches, as they are
> not really specific to Poetry, and wait for them to be merged before
> submitting a patch set with only `poetry-core` and `poetry`?

The sole "problematic" patch is the one updating python-distlib, in the
sense that it cannot be applied in the same branch as the others (unless
everything goes into core-updates, of course).

If you can split the set into independent parts, i.e., if you don't
really need to update python-distlib prior to updating Poetry, we can
process it differently.

> The process is not yet clear to me. Out of sheer curiosity… can someone object
> to a merge in master? Who would that be?

Per (info "(guix) Submitting Patches"), packages with more than 1800
dependent packages, as is the case with python-distlib, are updated in
the "core-updates" branch. If I apply it on master branch, it will be
reverted presto by another commiter.

Does that make sense?

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 166 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.