GNU bug report logs - #44068
28.0.50; Faulty uses of tabulated-list-format

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>

Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:01:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Merged with 41861

Found in versions 27.0.91, 28.0.50

Done: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #65 received at 44068 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 44068 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#44068: 28.0.50; Faulty uses of tabulated-list-format
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:07:34 +0100
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 23:51:21 +0000 Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net> writes:
>
>> It seems to.  I did experiment a bit with the width when I made the
>> patch just for the selected column and thought the length I used there
>> gave the best results, but maybe that was too cautious.  Does this patch
>> give better results (it differs from the previous one only in the
>> lengths checked and used for truncating):
>
> I think this looks very good, yes.  It works fully as I would expect, at
> least: it seems to always correctly show the sorting indicator and the
> ellipsis.
>
> (I tested using list-buffers, list-bookmarks, list-packages,
> list-processes, list-dynamic-libraries, org-lint and
> flymake-diagnostics-buffer-mode.)

Thanks for testing.

> Perhaps we could just go over the list above as you did in your first
> patch and make sure that there is enough space for all of these to show
> a sorting indicator without it touching the next column label.

I'll try to do that soon, but feel free to beat me to it ;-)

As an aside, do you think that use of the :right-align :pad-right
properties in timer-list-mode in my first patch is a good change?

>> It might be better to take more width parameters into account, as
>> tabulated-list-print-col does, but that seems rather more complicated
>> and I currently don't have time to pursue it.
>
> I imagine we can come back to and improve on this later.

Sure.

>> I wish I had more time for it but at the moment I don't.
>
> What you have here is already a big improvement, thank you.
>
> I would recommend to push this to master.

Thanks.  Eli, is that ok with you?

Steve Berman




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 270 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.